Jump to content

Please name one good story Jean Passanante is writing right now


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

NO ONE can.

I mean, how can you mess up someone plunging to their death? Yet, JPiss managed to do it. UGH. The only half-way decent story is Carjack's, and that's more about the superb acting of Michael and Maura, than the idiotic circumstances JPiss has created. (And yes, I'm referring to Jack's attraction to Katie, the Vengeful Twit.)

Oh, wait...the Pre-Teen stories are good. I suspect that's only because JPiss isn't allowed to write her usual nasty vision of human behavior. Otherwise, Faith would be doin' high school boys in deserted school buses, Parker would be on the road to being a skinhead, and JJ would be the victim of some kiddie-porn obsessed teacher.

  • Members
Posted

I can't get enough of Cleo "I HUART QEN" Babbit! <_<

Homegirl should have been working at the Commissery years ago instead of writing this crap.

  • Members
Posted

AMC was lucky to only have had her for 8 months! All unwatchable all terribly bad, almost as bad as the sh*t called ATWT.

  • Members
Posted

It is mind boggling that the powers that be at P&G and CBS haven't pink slipped her ass by now. And, since her contract is up for renewal in July, it looks like she's not going anywhere. ATWT is as bad as I've ever seen it and that includes the god-awful year of Sterns & Black in 1996.

When a show sinks so low and the writing is so bad that you actually breathe a sigh of relief when your favorites are NOT ON, then something's terribly wrong. I thought the AMC fans were just over-reacting when they warned us about how bad she was and how she almost ruined their show, but sadly, in retrospect, they were right on point.

  • Members
Posted

The thing is Jean Passanante has been with ATWT for a very long time. She is one of the longest running head writers right now if you count her co-head writing. She began in August 2001 as co-head writer with Hogan Sheffer and then was promoted to head writer in May 2005. So she has been head writer by herself for two years but all together has been with show for almost six years. Her co-head writers are Leah Laiman/Chris Whitesell. I would love it if Richard Culliton who wrote ATWT back years ago would take over. ATWT needs a new head writer with the program. What kills me is Jean Passanante is one of the few who has worked for close to 16 years straight. She started at OLTL in 1991 in different writing positions going all the way to head writer in 1996. She left OLTL in 1998 to write the last year of AW with Leah Laiman. Then she went to AMC from about July 1999-August 2001. She was co-head writer for a year and half and then became sole head writer before moving to ATWT. She is like the energizer bunny that keeps going. I actually liked Sheffer's stuff more then Jean's. Sheffer's stuff was hit/miss but fun, bigger then life and moved fast. Jean is slow, dull, and boring writing for ATWT. I think bring the Cullitons to ATWT. How about bringing Carolyn Culliton back to ATWT with her husband co-writing the show?

  • Members
Posted

ATWT is unbelievably bad. I think probably one of if not the worst show on the air at this time. LOL yes we warned you constantly and I will admit when Jean first took over I actually thought she was doing "ok" but I guess she was just working through the last of Hogan's stories. It began to quickly tank the minute she had Emily shooting Paul and going completely mental. And as if Emily's character wasn't already at the point of destruction, Jean goes and makes Emily a friggin hooker!

BAD BAD BAD!

  • Members
Posted

And let me add repetitive to that list. Falling off cliffs.......cars being run off the road....oy. This woman came up with the character of Cleo Babbit? :rolleyes: And Christopher Goutman allowed this awful, ridiculous character to be seen on screen. I am embarrassed at how low ATWT has sunk with the Cleo character.

  • Members
Posted

I saw on another board that folks are calling JP Miss Pissante..... First off, the show is soo one dimesional to me... meaning, they use a whole lot of two characters and very little of some very good talent. The only time you see Tom and Margo is when they are of course pimping up the Katie/Jack crapfest storyline..... We still have YET to have a really good Luke storyline that actually stays on screen rather than being dropped everytime to focus on the latest crisis of Gwen and Will. They totally messed up royally when they named Jade as Rose's daughter, only to keep her boxed in by having her constantly obsessing about Gwen and Will. They turned a former troublemaker and turning her into a pistol shooting woman reaching her breaking point sooo much that she opts to turn tricks because some local lush at the bar mistakes her for a Woman of the Evening. Then to top all things, they take a character that I loved so much and made him into the replica of the Dead Zone....The list can go on and on...

  • Members
Posted

The ratings for that were actually good. I didnt mind it because it was shocking and new at the time. But my problem was Emily didnt even recieve mental help for her problems. She was instantly cured and she wasnt punished for her crime. I agree though with the hooker stuff it was BAD! It was so BAD that I laughed at times. Not a good sign if you ask me.

  • Members
Posted

Exactly...and as to Luke when he is on it is repetitive stuff. He gives Noah these looks and he(Noah) wonders why Luke is looking at him that way. There hasnt been one single movement in the Luke storyline. How can Luke have a crush on Noah when they arent even friends yet!

  • Members
Posted

Oh yeah, and lets not forget that god aweful, cover your eyes scene between Jack and Katie. I still have to run to wash my eyes out whenever I see them on screen because it takes me right back to that scene of Katie "I'll Do Any Man in Oakdale" Peretti's legs spread on a table on the set of the studio AACK.... :rolleyes:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • After the slap it does feel inevitable - being arrested and thrown out right after her big win.
    • Yesterday it was Theo and Jada.  Today it's Chad and Belle.  What a mess.  
    • I asked my soap historian GPT to help pull together the best available sources on Daniel Pilon’s run, and here’s what the research confirms: * Pilon played Max Dubujak on *Ryan’s Hope* from 1983–88. * He began appearing as Alan Spaulding on *Guiding Light* in 1988. * An academic source notes that he appeared as **Max and Alan simultaneously in November 1988 * His later-life interviews mention major upheavals, including losing his home in the Northridge earthquake and declaring bankruptcy in 1994.  That’s the factual foundation. Now for the human side of it. I’ll admit Pilon was never my favorite Alan. The Spauldings are supposed to have that patrician, Midwestern money vibe, and suddenly here comes this very European-sounding gentleman sweeping into Springfield like he wandered in from a different soap entirely. It created a strange tonal shift, at least in my memory. Whether he was intended to be temporary is hard to pin down, but honestly, looking at what he was dealing with in his real life, I don’t know that the show ever had a truly stable window to figure it out. He was going through marital strife, while being talked about as the "next James Bond" back in Canada, and juggling work on two soaps at once is a lot. Under those circumstances, the question of whether he was the “right” type for Alan becomes almost secondary to the fact that he was working through multiple emergencies while stepping into one of GL’s biggest roles. So for me, the story of his Alan isn’t just about casting fit. It’s about an actor navigating chaos, the show adapting on the fly, and Springfield getting a very unexpected version of one of its cornerstone characters.  
    • I wish Nicole had swallowed but it is what it is lol 
    • You're probably right, but it's such a mistake to have Dani return to Bill. I do not want that. I like Bill, but that's probably because he's so much better than his garbage wife. Having Dani take back the guy who NEVER stopped cheating on her during their marriage would be a terrible mistake.  Yes, it's a mistake I can see Dani making. That doesn't mean I want to see it.
    • That's funny, I totally didn't think about the possibility that they'll pin this on someone else.  I assumed they'd just roll him into the water.  Obviously, I would not make an ideal hitman. I hope it's not Laura.
    • Andre/Dani, be still my heart 

      Please register in order to view this content

        I knew their booty call hook ups then being friends with benefits were so going to turn into love 
    • Yes it does!! And neglect! They let it drop so long and so often it doesn’t really have much meaning beyond another recurring character killed off. I kind of agree. I don’t want Emma to be SA’d, but he was a creepy professor perv at first, and we could have higher stakes if they let him be a scumbag for longer. Even to add more suspects, like Gio punched his lights out for grabbing Emma innapropriately. Or even better, she punches him, then Gio does too. He had the potential to be fun for a bit longer. I always love it when they do a shooting in the snow on this show lol.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      I went back to see how teen Sami even figured out how to sell a baby in 1993, and the recap is unintentionally hilarious. The exposition is so blunt it feels like the writers drafted it between bites of lunch. Suddenly there’s a teen mom named Karen who sold her baby through a shady lawyer, and somehow Sami just… knows this man and pays him with hospital volunteer money. You can tell they were trying to make the whole thing “plausible” enough, but also knew the baby wouldn’t be gone long enough to justify a real subplot.  I know one thing, if Karen had confided in Jamie, Sami would've never met Steve Miller. Jamie knew that snitches get stitches. Not to be confused with the horrific Stephen Miller, who was 8 in 1993. AND Just to show the audience how shady Steve the lawyer could be, he was played by this guy -- Character actor Terry Wills was cast as creeps on every sitcom in the 1980s.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy