Jump to content

Couric ratings at historic low


Sylph

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Not surprising, especially because Katie is all wrong for the CBS Evening News. I felt like Russ Mitchell did an outstanding, upstaging job when he filled in for Couric the week of Gerald Ford's death. It was like having Schieffer back. Less glamour, less unintentional smiling, more news. I was hoping that b!tch would be on vacation for the rest of the week.

The main reason why Katie can't connect with viewers is because no one buys her as a serious journalist. And the face-lifts and botox that give her half-smiles when she's reporting serious topics make her look terrible on-camera.

If CBS wanted a woman and wanted a "name" anchor, they should have just went with Diane Sawyer. At least she's not an aging sorority girl wanting to recapture her youth on the air.

I am really hoping they buy out her contract and replace her with either Russ Mitchell or hell, pay Schieffer whatever he wants to get his old ass back in NY. That's my boy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That was stupid of Rather to speak to FOX NEWS, one of the same media outlets that wanted his head for the 60 MINUTES II story he did that got him fired.

I wouldn't say the Evening News is tart! My God, I wish it were. Maybe it would make the show that much more exciting.

And Moonves wants us to give it time?! By then, they'll all be watching Charles Gibson, who's numbers are climbing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What should have been a chance for history to be made has turned into a disaster. Katie's low ratings imply that women can't do the job of a news anchor. It all rests on you Hillary to shatter sexist misconceptions.

Dan Rather can shut the hell up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ICAM! I feel really bad for Katie and in fact women everywhere because this situation is deteriorating RAPIDLY and if it doesn't improve anytime soon she's definitely going to be fired I think. And that would be tragic. I don't find her to be "fake" or anything. I just don't watch ABC, NBC, OR CBS for news at that time. I'm more of a CNN type of guy.

But I don't understand why her ratings are so low. Thats the biggest mystery of all to me. There was so much hype and potential surrounding her. Where did it all go?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hope you don't think that I'm sexist or that I have misconceptions. I think there are several women that would have done GREAT in the Evening News(Meredith Vieira would have been a dream!). Katie just doesn't have it and I honestly don't think she ever did.

It's a combination of her lack of hard news experience and the extensive plastic surgery that gives her this smiling thing when she's trying to be serious. It's really sad.

I say Russ Mitchell or Bob Schieffer!

Because she's not that good! In fact, she's not good at all! I only watch the CBS Evening News because most of the daytime/late evening programming I watch happens to air on my CBS Affiliate.

Shieffer should have just stayed. CBS should have offered the man whatever he wanted to keep him. Shieffer's broadcasts brought an energy and charm to them that I don't think we've seen in years. No pretensions about him, he just delivered the news to you. He had a charm that made him easy to relate to not just the on-assignment anchors he handed the stories over to(like Lara Logan I think her name is) but the audience who watched him.

Any woman that replaced Shieffer needed to have these qualities. Katie just doesn't have those. So it is no shock to me that she has not only managed to undo Shieffer's work(yes, the ratings rose with him in charge, not by much, but a rather significant gain) but has sunk the CBS Evening News to lows that haven't been seen since the 1980's. That's pathetic.

I started watching the Evening News again after Shieffer took over CBS. He's greatly missed by me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, I don't think any of you are sexist. I firmly agree that Katie is the wrong choice as anchor. Her bubbly persona is off putting when delivering serious news. Her biggest error was on the first day. She wanted viewers to give her a sign off. The telecast is not a call in particpation program.

My earlier comment was meant to infer that her inability to be a comptent host might lead others to reject the notion that a woman can do the job as well or good as a man.

Katie should save face and go to 60 Minutes. She seems more in her element, buttressed by others and fluff pieces.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL. LOVE IT!

I agree with this as well, although I think a lot of people in the industry realize it's Couric and NOT the fact that she's a woman. I do think they'll wait another five-to-ten years before they try anything else groundbreaking, even hiring someone African-American, like Russ Mitchell(whom I adore...he's so handsome and the kind of anchor/personality Bryant Gumbel should have been).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy