Jump to content

May 14-18, 2007


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

DAYS reclaims 18-34, nice and long time no see. Slowly but surely they're gaining ground, that's good especially since you've all been saying the show is improving.

MONDAY, MAY 14, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Monday: 4.1/5,320,000 (+222,000)

2.(4) GH: Monday: 2.8/3,944,000 (+639,000)

3.(3) B&B: Monday: 2.9/3,675,000 (+230,000)

4.(5) OLTL: Monday: 2.5/3,218,000 (+188,000)

5.(2) AMC: Monday: 2.5/3,156,000 (-327,000)

6.(6) ATWT: Monday: 2.3/2,916,000 (+276,000)

7.(7) DAYS: Monday: 2.1/2,624,000 (+81,000)

8.(8) GL: Monday: 2.1/2,617,000 (+87,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Monday: 1.3/1,689,000 (-84,000)

TUESDAY, MAY 15, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Tuesday: 4.5/5,839,000 (+519,000)

2.(3) B&B: Tuesday: 3.1/3,863,000 (+188,000)

3.(2) GH: Tuesday: 2.8/3,769,000 (-175,000)

4.(4) OLTL: Tuesday: 2.5/3,145,000 (-73,000)

5.(5) AMC: Tuesday: 2.4/3,113,000 (-43,000)

6.(6) ATWT: Tuesday: 2.4/3,101,000 (+185,000)

7.(7) DAYS: Tuesday: 2.1/2,560,000 (-64,000)

8.(8) GL: Tuesday: 2.0/2,550,000 (-67,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Tuesday: 1.4/1,696,000 (+7,000)

WEDNESDAY, MAY 16, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Wednesday: 4.4/5,804,000 (-35,000)

2.(2) B&B: Wednesday: 3.1/4,056,000 (+193,000)

3.(3) GH: Wednesday: 2.9/3,697,000 (-72,000)

4.(5) AMC: Wednesday: 2.5/3,227,000 (+114,000)

5.(6) ATWT:Wednesday: 2.4/3,170,000 (+69,000)

6.(4) OLTL: Wednesday: 2.5/3,164,000 (+19,000)

7.(8) GL: Wednesday: 2.0/2,709,000 (+159,000)

8.(7) DAYS: Wednesday: 2.0/2,597,000 (+37,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Wednesday: 1.3/1,566,000 (-130,000)

THURSDAY, MAY 17, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Thursday: 4.2/5,643,000 (-161,000)

2.(2) B&B: Thursday: 2.8/3,683,000 (-373,000)

3.(3) GH: Thursday: 2.5/3,314,000 (-383,000)

4.(4) AMC: Thursday: 2.4/3,123,000 (-104,000)

5.(6) OLTL: Thursday: 2.3/3,015,000 (-149,000)

6.(5) ATWT:Thursday: 2.0/2,715,000 (-455,000)

7.(8) DAYS: Thursday: 2.1/2,601,000 (+4,000)

8.(7) GL: Thursday: 1.8/2,435,000 (-274,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Thursday: 1.5/1,782,000 (+216,000)

FRIDAY, MAY 18, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Friday: 4.1/5,548,000 (-95,000)

2.(2) B&B: Friday: 3.0/3,947,000 (+264,000)

3.(3) GH: Friday: 2.6/3,331,000 (+17,000)

4.(4) AMC: Friday: 2.5/3,330,000 (+207,000)

5.(6) ATWT: Friday: 2.4/3,165,000 (+450,000)

6.(5) OLTL: Friday: 2.3/2,995,000 (-20,000)

7.(7) DAYS: Friday: 2.0/2,710,000 (+109,000)

8.(8) GL: Friday: 2.0/2,702,000 (+267,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Friday: 1.4/1,784,000 (+2,000)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Congratulations to both Y&R and B&B: well deserved ratings increases. B)

DAYS: I admit the return of the DiMeras should boost the ratings, although it's a shame they won't bring back Jack too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I will be interested in DAYS numbers next week to see if Tony's presence warrants any lift in viewers from Thursday to Friday's eppy. Ratings probably won't come out next week until Friday because of Memorial Day so we all need to keep that in mind.

I am glad DAYS recaptured the #1 spot int he 18-34 demo, even though its only a 1.4. I am hoping DAYS climbs in the ratings in June with all the vets being utilized(I assume will happen) and the return of some faces from the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OMG, stop the world, Days jumped, OMG. Sorry, couldn't resist. But no really, every week there's pages and pages of people bitching about them falling, and they jump and no one says a word? I don't f'ing think so. LOL If I have read through the "Poor Days ratings tread" week after week, then I damn well want to see a party now. ;)

I tease, I tease, well kinda. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Most of the Days fans had their accounts suspended. That's why, LoL.

I think Days is going to take a tumble next week, -.1 or .2

The show is on its way back up in quality, but I still think there's a sense of "too little, too late" when it comes to the show. It's gonna have to deliver on all cylinders for every single episode here on out in order to retain the few viewers who are willing to come back. This past week has been decent, but there were a few clunker episodes... a bit of filler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, well that blows about their accounts being suspended. And on a week they could have done something other then bitch. LOL Anyway, I'm just having fun. :) I want GH to fall, and AMC to fall, and ABC as a whole to get [!@#$%^&*] on, becaue that fat bastard needs to go yesterday, but other then that, eh, whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually, Kenny, last week was clunker week. Nothing really happened last week. This week the island mess ended and so did Steve/Kayla for the most part. Bo has been on every day and today's episode will get a nice boost. People read the day aheads and will watch for the vets and tomarrow will definitely get a high daily rating with J&M fans. If anything, Days will either maintain or go up +1 for this week.

However, it should be said, Days usually gets bad numbers for good week's and good numbers for bad weeks. Last week had nothing big yet it did bigger then the LUMI wedding, unless people were afraid to watch the LUMI wedding and only tuned in after hearing how good it was and how much the show improved.

Days will be at 2.1 or 2.2 next week. This is one time I am sure of that. Good to see them back at #1 in 18-34 though. Slowly recovering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But it's still a 2.1. Is that really anything to be happy about? I remember not that long ago there were Days fans hoping (realistically) for a 3.0, so I can see why no one is ready to rejoice over a .1 bump.

Y&R and B&B have both been great, so I'm glad they got a bump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Of the so-called "contract" cast members, I'd venture to say these are recurring: Bryton James, Camryn Grimes, and (possibly) Michael Graziadei.  I've suspected since 2018 that Kate Linder and Christian LeBlanc are recurring.  And I believe we all know Miss Ordway is, because she said so. lol.  
    • Dante blaming Gio instead of his dweeb son and the other dweeb was just ridiculous. Gio's paternity story is going in circles with no reveal. I've already started fast forwarding Drew and his stupid ho Willow's story. Kristina's story is beyond dumb with no great payoff.
    • Sarah (with the English accent) isn't just some random character.  Sarah was once the housekeeper for Eliot Dorn and Margo Huntington.  One of the following 2 scenarios happened a few months ago: (1):  One night, while Margo wasn't at home, and while Oscar the Doorman wasn't at his post, a burglar sneaked into the private elevator, rode up to the penthouse, stole several thousand dollars worth of Margo's valuable diamonds and pearls, and tied-up Eliot Dorn and Sarah the Housekeeper, ensuring that Eliot and Sarah couldn't pursue the burglar back down to the lobby or phone the police to apprehend the burglar. OR --  (2): Eliot Dorn was SLEEPING with Sarah the Housekeeper, and the two of them conspired to steal Margo's jewelry and went on a lavish spending spree and then tied THEMSELVES up to make it look as though a burglary had occurred in the penthouse. Margo Dorn currently believes Scenario #1 occurred, and she's rather annoyed that the "incompetent police" haven't located her stolen jewels yet.  Eliot and Sarah know that Scenario #2 actually occurred.  When Sarah stopped by the Unicorn and saw Eliot kissing Raven Swift, Sarah snidely said, "Oh! This must be Mrs. Dorn!  Nice to meet you, Mrs. Dorn!" Sarah knew good & damn well Raven isn't "Mrs. Dorn" because Sarah worked for Margo Dorn on a daily basis for many months.  That was Sarah's not-so-subtle way of announcing, "I'll be paying a visit to District Attorney Logan Swift and letting him know that his wife is sleeping with you, and I'll be paying a visit to WMON to let Margo Huntington know that you're sleeping with Mrs. Swift!"  lol.     
    • The AMC hate came from Jamey Giddens/DC and their industry friends, IMO. For whatever reason I always felt they targeted the show, and it was wrong. AMC ratings were decent and even went up under Pratt (Yet, he was fired). The ratings were also good under Broderick and lowered out after her interim.  There was no reason to be upset with the show other than it being slow. They literally played it safe and did the best they could in 2010 and 2011. 
    • I have very detailed synopses of all 1976 storylines for the soaps from the Daytime Serial Newsletter. Please let me know if you are interested in a particular show and I will post it in the appropriate thread. As I stated they are very detailed, so I don't want to clutter up threads if posters are not interested.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy