Jump to content

DAYS: Drake News


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Must you bring up the Anti-christ in every thread? This is about DRAKE. Not JERk.

On that note, makes sense that he'd return the same day Tony is set. I'm actually looking forward to it. And that's saying a lot since I don't really care for John.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, I'm inclined to agree. Hogan started ruining the show from the very beginning and my remarks then were that Corday hired him just so he could kill the show....argh. Highly doubtful but that's what it's been, a slow death. However, this last week was really good, I think and so hopefully since the facing of truth and reality amongst the producer and writer, it will become a good soap again. I have high hopes that the return of the DiMera's will give glamour, passion and high excitement to the stories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Why would Corday hire Hogan to kill the show? Reilly was doing a more than adequate job of that himself. ;)

In any case, I disagree that HS started ruining the show "from the very beginning". In many respects, his first 3/4 months were unquestionably good for DAYS. The stories sped up dramatically, rooting couples were reunited and there were obvious improvements in the day to day material (more intelligent dialogue, more diverse character interaction, fewer flashbacks or false cliffhangers etc.) The ratings remained stable throughout this period and even began to inch up around late December/early January. I'm not saying the material was perfect but compared to JER's orgy of interloper sex, endless triangles and generally moronic stories, it was a godsend.

Clearly, something has gone badly wrong along the way. Perhaps Corday intefered or perhaps Hogan just started sucking but I wouldn't describe his entire tenure thus far as a disaster. Though I have doubts about his compatibility with DAYS, Oct-Dec suggests that he's capable of much better than the current material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Amazing. Corday was the one who screwed up Days in that case, not JER, but now HS is the one whose at fault, not Corday.

In your eyes, JER won't take any blame for anything. You are more than entitled to that opinion, but......

MAN do I disagree. JER, with Corday's help, almost destroyed Days, and I am just trying to figure out how it is Corday's fault in JER's case, but Hogan takes the brunt of the blame now, and Corday is basically off the hook.

But, anyway, I'm glad Drake is finally back on screen. It's about time. Hope he sticks around this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Does nayone know when Drake's comtract is up? I wouldn't be surprised if he just walked. Maybe that was the intention of the writers all laong in order to free up money in the budget; they screw him over so badly that he quits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm screaming at those clips and gifs.  THIS IS PURE GOLD.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's always been my thought. I can't imagine that the show would play up the unseen AD so far in advance without them casting a *star*. After today's episode, I wonder if he'll somehow be connected with Diane. It was strange that Diane mentioned her very distant family today. I can't recall Diane ever talking about her backstory. Maybe he's her much younger brother?  It's also possible he's connected to Diane during her time in LA. Sally's already said she crossed paths with him. OC, I think Dumas is Mariah's mistake.... As a side note, it was good to see some mixing it up - Adam with Clare/Kyle and Sharon with Tessa.
    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy