Jump to content

April 16-20, 2007


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The negativity doesn't really help matters. I swear the Internet is like the best and worst thing to happen to soaps. People come on forums and then bash soaps for no reason saying that "such and such soap is just horrible because of A, B, C" Then that gets passed on and on until it becomes "such and such soap is just the worst soap ever because of A-F" when thats not even the case. But of course this "fact" is spread from website to website and people tune out because of something they've been told. Yes some of the soaps are in bad shape but others are just fine IMO and if people would give it a chance instead of listening to all this negativity they'd actually be surprised at how great they are. Days, ATWT, and OLTL are all fantastic soaps that are doing good things right now yet they're constantly picked one for one dumb reason or another. Each deserves better credit that most are giving it but I guess that won't happen at all so theres no point in talking about it.

It just saddens me when I think of what you guys are saying might happen and how many people are missing out on these great shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't believe that Days has dipped below 2.0! That's frightening.

And the demographics are scary, too. Days used to occupy the 18 - 49 slot week after week after week for years at a time, and now it's at the bottom of the barrel there, as well?

Scary.

It's toast in 2009. TOAST.

It's really a simple fix, though. Focus on the right characters. Give them good stories. BALANCE. The problem is, has Days lost too many viewers at this point? Will any of them come back? How many viewers have been lost for good? At this point, I'd say quite a few. It's getting harder and harder to win back lost viewers, so Days can't afford to take idiotic risks because in today's soap world, they likely won't recover from the drop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah. I've come to terms that DAYS will be gone in 2009, and it's the best thing to do, IMO. Those that still think DAYS will be on the air after this contractual period are in for a big shock/disappointment.

And I don't think the ratings can ever be fixed. The show, yes. Any show can be fixed. Just make the quality of the show better. It's not as hard as soaps make it.

But the ratings have eroded *SO* much. There is no recovering from it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The ratings go down year by year. Two years from now, in 2009, the ratings will be even lower than they are now. And Days is just so, so done. I've accepted it. And frankly, I'm not all that unhappy about it. I want the show to go out while it still means something, before it's completely wrecked. And once my show is gone, I can rid myself of the 'soap opera burden,' LoL

We know soaps are going down anyway, and although it doesn't make me happy, this is just a fact of life. Why prolong the inevitable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hate to bring this up because I know the idea is going to fail and I don't want to sound like Rion or anything but you said the same thing about Passions. That show got picked up with a 1.5 rating and NBC actually had meetings with alot of suiters (CW, Fox, etc) for it. Frons indictated a desire for it and if it can at least get up to respectibility and be competitive then I think it will be fine. I think it could very well end up on Soapnet.

I think it's important that we stay hopeful. Otherwise, if all we deal in is negativity, it's hard to watch it. Plus, the show can and will be good again. There is always going to be hope until a show is cancelled and that last episode airs.

I just think optimism is the way to go because if all people are going to do is countdown to the end for Days and all soaps then this is going to be a gloomy message board. I think we all know what we are dealing with so I think beating it around like a dead horse is doing nothing but depressing everyone. Let's just hope for the best, enjoy our soaps, and discuss them in a manner where we don't tear them apart so much that all enjoyment is taken out.

JMO :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

PSNS got a reprieve, but it's still donezo. Their ratings are also lower than ever, and they will be even lower on DTV (restricted audience.).

Both NBC soaps will be off the air, in all formats, shortly. It's really sad. And it's kind of devastating considering how much I used to love both shows and NBC daytime in general, but the shows have NO ONE to blame but themselves. So, that lessens the sadness for me. I don't feel sorry when I see birds constantly flying into a window. So, I am not going to feel bad for these idiots when there show is canceled, and they are out of work! They refuses to give the fans what they want, so their ratings will fall, and they will get canceled. A + B = C!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm actually happy about the low ratings for Days. They deserve 'em, at the moment.

The show is done in 2009 either way, regardless. So, a low rating when the show is bad will serve as a well-needed wakeup call and with any luck, it'll get TBTB to get their asses in gear, turn the show around and give me a good soap to watch for its final two years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree. I haven't watch the show in weeks, and before that, months. If you asked me that from the time I was 8 until the time I was 22...that I would have stopped watching DAYS daily, I would have laughed in your face.

Honestly, I don't think DAYS is much worse than anything else on the air. All soaps should be hovering down in the low 2.0's in my opinion.

Except Y&R of course, but not even that show deserves what it's getting!

DAYTIME = SCREWED.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ratings go down every year but it was an accepted reality for many years- only difference now is that we've seen far more people desert soaps in the 21st Century than they ever did during OJ.

Soaps only reap what they sow. When all you go for is a short-term gain, it can only have devastating effects in the long term. That's how network execs, producers and writers work these days and that's why we've come to this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Zucker made it clear; the ratings are NOT what prompted his decision to end DAYS. NBC simply has no interest in soaps. They want reality based programming, news and sports. Even if DAYS pulled ratings in the 3's or 4's NBC would want out. And at this point that is just fine with me IMO that would be the best thing to happen to DAYS in a decade. As NBC does not own any part of DAYS it is quite possible that another network will consider picking up DAYS. Ever since NBC cut AW from its lineup they have been undermining and hurting DAYS by deconstructing the daytime lineup. In my area the lead in for DAYS is LOCAL PROGRAMING. At least it's new programming this year. Last year it was clips of new pieces filmed over a decade ago. I KID YOU NOT!

If DAYS was on any other broadcast network I have no doubt in my mind that DAYS would be in second or third place. NBC has been costing DAYS ratings points and that has been affecting DAYS budget which in turn has been effecting how Corday is able to run the show.

After 2009 I will never watch another NBC daytime program. NBC daytime will be dead to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Doesn't help that DAYS's second airing is at Midnight, when a lot of people are still awake and/or are probably used to seeing DAYS in that later timeslot.

I understand what Frons was trying to do(by featuring hip, young DAYS as the primetime lead-in instead of its SONY sister, Y&R), but that honestly hurt the show.

The affiliates, especially the O&O's are looking for any excuse to get rid of DAYS. The San Francisco affiliate got rid of AW, right?! You'll have to wait until the summer leading up to fall to see if any local affiliates plan to drop DAYS after the summer. I'm willing to bet my ass that they have an insurance plan(RE: more syndicated programming and news) for fall if DAYS continues on their downward spiral.

And even if DAYS survives the 2007-2008 season, there is no guarantee the affiliates will do it for what could be DAYS's final months on the air. The Olympics will be coming up in August of '08 and after that, who knows if the affiliates will want to carry a dead show through March, 2009?!

DAYS could rise in the ratings again...but affiliate support is ever so crucial right now.

I doubt that, but I do think NBC sabotaged its own daytime lineup.

In my area, infomercials are the lead-in for DAYS. I do think that is another huge problem with DAYS and that is the lack of proper support from its affiliates.

NBC is NOT 100% to blame for the state of DAYS right now. I repeat, NOT 100% to blame.

I think half of that responsibility belongs to Ken Corday, who insists on forcefeeding the fans what they THINK they need to see instead of what they want to see.

And again, I say that not snatching up Eileen was one of their biggest mistakes.

*sigh* How I wish it were 1995-1997 again! DAYS totally ruled the world back then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If planned storylines using the vets don't go according to plan, the axe might fall on Days sooner than the predicted 2009 date :(

Many will think that the woes at NBC Daytime are just part of a greater malaise at NBC- perhaps. They can only rely on the gem that is the Law & Order franchise for so long, surely.

I agree that Corday has a lot to answer for, but the network's abysmal support for soaps has been so evident ever since the axe fell on Santa Barbara.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • There's some irony in Philip being forgiven, because it forces everyone to admit that Victor was wrong to change his will.  Everyone, eventually including Xander, (I presume), seems to think it was wrong for Victor to divide his estate in Xander's favor.  I appreciated Stephanie forgiving Philip, because she's got no skin in that game.  But, Belle's line about Philip missing Xander because he misses Bo did not ring true.  I think Philip would be sad if Bo dies, but I think he's more concerned currently about Xander. I am enjoying this EJ mystery so much that I am hereby taking a vow not to read spoilers.  I am also vowing — for the last time — to stop harping on this, but: the concept of a “sepsis treatment” remains absurd. Hospitals prevent sepsis through vigilant infection control; once sepsis sets in, it causes multiple organ failures. Treatment involves supporting each failing organ individually. The notion that a single medication could magically reverse organ failure is medically laughable. However, I like the contrast of Kim going through cancer, which is incurable in their universe.  Kayla's comment on the health of both of her siblings was both heartbreaking and an interesting twist.  MBE is also totally underrated.  She is carrying the weight of so many stories.   And, I like the use of Kayla as an audience surrogate.  She's arguably the most "real" person in Salem. Kayla isn't psychic, she wasn't SORASed, she's not a billionaire, and she doesn't have a bionic eye.  So, I enjoy that we get her perspective of the nuttiness that surrounds her. However, I don't get what gives her the authority to turn down EJ's offer.  I understand that they need a hospital figurehead to show us scenes of the competition to buy the hospital.  But, unless the entire administration has been let go, the Chief of Staff wouldn't make those choices.
    • But why worry about something that might not happen? Right now, most things revolve around the Duprees. We have no idea if or how long that will continue. For now, it's working.
    • The Duprees not having any staff is a bugbear for me. They've included the background staff at the Country Club but no one at the Dupree home. Even just an extra bringing in a tray of food/drinks or responding to a request from Anita would suffice.
    • Shut up, Dante and Lois.  I actually don't mind this particular soap trope, but in the context of this storyline, it just feels forced and unnecessary. If anything, this Dante/Gio tension needed to begin months ago. Plus, this storyline, in general, isn't doing Lois any favors either.  Emma comforting Gio was really sweet though. It's definitely time for the two of them to have their first kiss. And, Joss playing Secret Agent Barbie will just never work.
    • Note to makeup - Smitty’s eyebrows, bad clamshell look.  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Okay I can buy that when Brook Lynn was a teen.  Now she knows the child is a boy one would think she'd be slightly suspicious.  Then again, Gio looks nothing like either of them so maybe not lol.
    • I've been behind & just got caught up & the last 3 days were amazing!
    • Yeah.  The hot, poor bad boy with a chip on his shoulder but with a heart of gold was a common soap trope in the 80s 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's been an issue with me... the lack of a cohesive 'Have Not' crowd that has focus other than Leslie/Eva.   I would beef up Jan, Mona, Laura, Joey, and few other male characters.. and not just be out to overthrow the Duprees.. but co-existing and broadening the scope of the show since the show is called Beyond the Gates. I think the set up the show has with everything revolving around the Duprees will become predictable especially if they always win.   It would be like Victor Newman on Y & R for 40+ years.. always winning, hardly ever losing.   With MVJ/Guza.. both trained under that mindset... I fear that will happen.   I've always heard from a performer that is playing a character like Leslie/Dana that you have to find the victim/hurt beneath the surface in order to play a villain/villainess... and I think that's why I enjoy watching her.. because she brings so much more to the part than what the writers put on the page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy