Jump to content

AMC McTavish's Swansong - April 30


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I'm pleased they have apparently employed people not from the current AMC dialogue corps, who make everyone sound, young or old, male or female, like they are !@#$%^&*]y little sneering queens straight out of Valley of the Dolls. Complete with ad nauseum pop culture references. There's such a thing as too much snark.

Is Eden Riegel really out? I had no idea. I guess l'affaire Zarf offended and disgusted her even more than it did me.

My only complaint is I wish these people would take over OL instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

That's Amanda L. Beall's doing -- the woman some poor misguided souls believe is AMC's savior. The woman is absolutely obnoxious with all of her pop culture, snarky, sneering queen, slut, b!tch, tramp, whore, skank, psycho creep, catch phrase dialog. Like I said, I'm glad this joke of a writer didn't get promoted to a co-head position, because she's horrible.

March 29, 2006

Babe brings Amanda to work for Fusion. Simone, having just lost Ethan after Janet caused the explosion at the Mardi Gras Ball, flips out. Kendall throws Babe and Amanda out, screeching:

Kendall:

Just go. Go, go, ok? Go to the hospital, go to hell, go anywhere. Just get the hell away from us now, both of you.
Who's your surprise guest tomorrow, Osama?

March 29- BDW: Victor Miller; SW: Amanda L. Beall; D: Casey Childs -- Need I say more? :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That kind of approach is fine in small doses depending on the character but you can't do it constantly and with every single character, the way they seem to now. They all act like drag queens on a rampage, and at this point Kendall doesn't need to get any more drag queen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

R Sinclair, can you knock it off with the condescending tone to EVERY. SINGLE. ONE. OF. YOUR. POSTS. Really, there's a beautiful thing called DIFFERENCE IN OPINION. It seems whenever someone begins typing "Amand..." you're right there with the shotgun before the poster can even hit the 'submit' button. "And misguided little souls?" It's called difference in opinion, for christ's sake. It's the point where it's excessive and obnoxious. And hell, I know I'm not a moderator, so I'm probably out-of-bounds (wouldn't be the first time), but it's an observation I felt like posting.

For the record, I LOVED Amanda L. Beall's dialogue (although I would rank Karen Lewis above her). I HATE that she's not writing dialogue regularly anymore. The few times she has written the scripts in the last several months - namely the 9/11, V-Day shows, and one of 'em before Christmas (and she all wrote the breakdowns for them, as well), I felt she captured the true heart and soul of AMC. Nothing resembling something McTavish churned out. But that's just my opinion!

You love Joanna Cohen's dialogue. I think it's average and a little trite, at best.

But that's the beauty of diversity!

But I'm not going to call you a "misguided little soul" for loving JC, and then continue berating you for it in such a vile way.

Can we all just accept differences in opinion and move on? Because it seems whenever someone expresses different tastes than yours, you don't post a simple disagreement (which everyone is welcome to), you freaking POUNCE in the most aggressive, hostile way you can think of!

Edited - cause I can't spell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Poloma, I have never addressed any of my posts towards you. Why do you feel the need to continue to air your personal opinions about my conversations with others in the public forum? As for condescending, your "attack" when I didn't even do anything but praise Joanna Cohen is the epitome of "condescending." I was praising the dialog and the actors -- not a condescending tone in sight, yet that didn't sit well with you, either. So, I'm not going to "knock it off" because you're impossible to please, and it's not my job to please you.

No, you're just going to mock me and call me obsessed and tell me that you're afraid that I'll have to be carted off to a padded room if Joanna Cohen left the staff.

Anyway, Poloma, like I said in reply to that post -- if you have a personal problem with me, please use the PM feature instead of starting arguments in a public forum based on posts that, really, had nothing to do with you in the first place.

Have a pleasant day, and I still think Amanda L. Beall and her little self-impressed, snarky, catch-phrased soaked dialog sucks ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Damn. I hope the post wasn't edited because it was false information. Probably SON asked her to take it down until an official announcement was made.

Amanda L. Beall I think gets the show. Those stand alone episodes such as 9/11 and Valentines Day that she wrote.... they were great episodes and represented exactly what AMC is. So that's why I was hoping she'd be one of the ones promoted. Never the less I am glad she is still on the staff.

Addie Walsh and Stephen Demorest have experiance.... and Addie has a long history with AMC. They were the right people for the job and to be paired up with Kay Alden.... I think we are in for a great ride in Pine Valley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:lol:

No! Never play along. Speak from your heart. I respect that about you. You don;t hold anything back. I may like Amanda but you obviously do not and and I commend you for always speaking your opinion.

We do agree about Joanna Cohen though. I jumped on that train a while back. I lo0ve her dialog.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Well, Claire did rig Rick's test results, but it was to flunk. They actually managed to get his correct results back after they were thrown into Cedar's furnace...I think? Everyone knew Claire changed them and Rick passed so that rewrite never made sense.   I agree. Pratt always seems "edgy" on screen (and her Locker Room interview prooved that it came from her personality.) I liked Claire causeing trouble and love Meta ringing her beads. Its just too bad that Abby left and they kinda just forgot Claire existed. 
    • Oh so they did sleep together. The retcon was just the medical boards? That makes sense. I think Susan Pratt, while a good actress, was just an unlikeable presence onscreen and soaps wrote to that most of the time. There was some potential for more with her when she returned in that stint, as Pratt was at least interesting to watch and caused some conflict for the stifled Bauers. Instead of pairing her with Alan and then disappearing I might have had her hook up with Danny. I think there was a lot of flirtation with Bolger's Philip, but they never crossed the line.
    • I haven't seen Melchior in the role, but it would be astounding if she's worse than Linn. Her rivalry with Stephanie was sidelined IMO because Linn was one of the few actors who didn't have chemistry with, nor raise her game, when paired with Susan Flannery. To be fair, she did show some signs of life in scenes opposite Darlene Connelly, but way too little too late. It feels like Bell finally woke up after the Thorne switchover and sidelined the Kristin character with Mick to 1 or 2 appearances a week. As a result, the show improved by leaps and bounds after she was inexplicably at the center of the show for most of 1989. Margo is so much more enjoyable when not tied to that albatross. Even Clarke is watchable with less Kristin interaction. She can't exit stage left soon enough. As for the new Thorne, I agree that Norcross feels like a Forrester a lot more than Thrachta, even if the latter is a better actor.
    • The cast said that scenes were filmed over a few weeks, with a preplanned hiatus in the middle, and it was all out of order.  I would *guess* that they used Chandler when they could get him? They also had to work around Leo Howard getting married around the time these episodes were filmed, but I guess they worked it out since Tate appeared.
    • Maybe there was a scheduling conflict or something. He still has the full time 9-5 in Atlanta, right? Julie was there. Idk if Maggie’s gonna be a part of it though 
    • At this point, the best nonpaywall coverage of Los Angeles (and anything political)  is in...the Tennessee Holler https://bsky.app/profile/thetnholler.bsky.social And as always, emptywheel continues to be consistent https://bsky.app/profile/emptywheel.bsky.social
    • Today Monday was the start of people arriving at the funeral, but the service hasn't started yet.  I know this is the nonspoiler thread but I think it's okay to say (in nonspecific terms) that the funeral episodes span a few days.  I won't detail it more here. Just sayin' keep watching.
    • Why am I only now hearing about what happened in L.A., lol?
    • While I agree that Reeves is Jennifer, I honestly do prefer Cady McClain in the role, as I feel she had/has a wider range of acting capabilities than I feel Reeves has. It's the strength of an actor, ultimately, for me, regardless of how I feel about Reeves' political/social views (which I widely disagree with). Plus, not to mention, they costumed Reeves like an old-fashioned frumpy farm/Moron wife, while McClain had some fashion-forward moments.
    • Wait - so no Will, Jack, or Jen at John's funeral? That’s just weird. What was the point of bringing them back then? Did Julie and Maggie even show up? I mean, seriously.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy