Jump to content

February 19-23, 2007


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

MONDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Monday: 4.8/6,378,000 (+321,000)

2.(3) GH: Monday: 3.3/4,248,000 (+232,000)

3.(2) B&B: Monday: 3.1/4,100,000 (-97,000)

4.(4) AMC: Monday: 3.0/3,852,000 (+518,000)

5.(5) OLTL: Monday: 2.8/3,523,000 (+330,000)

6.(7) DAYS: Monday: 2.5/3,356,000 (+290,000)

7.(6) ATWT: Monday: 2.5/3,312,000 (+158,000)

8.(8) GL: Monday: 2.2/2,974,000 (+83,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Monday: 1.6/2,172,000 (+239,000)

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Tuesday: 4.2/5,541,000 (-837,000)

2.(2) GH: Tuesday: 3.1/4,180,000 (-68,000)

3.(3) B&B: Tuesday: 3.1/4,082,000 (-18,000)

4.(5) OLTL: Tuesday: 2.6/3,322,000 (-201,000)

4.(7) ATWT: Tuesday: 2.5/3,322,000 (+10,000)

6.(4) AMC: Tuesday: 2.6/3,310,000 (-542,000)

7.(6) DAYS: Tuesday: 2.4/3,144,000 (-212,000)

8.(8) GL: Tuesday: 2.2/2,941,000 (-33,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Tuesday: 1.4/1,699,000 (-473,000)

WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Wednesday: 4.4/5,764,000 (+223,000)

2.(3) B&B: Wednesday: 3.0/3,968,000 (-114,000)

3.(2) GH: Wednesday: 3.0/3,701,000 (-479,000)

4.(6) AMC: Wednesday: 2.6/3,363,000 (+53,000)

5.(4) OLTL: Wednesday: 2.5/3,215,000 (-107,000)

6.(4) ATWT: Wednesday: 2.3/3,027,000 (-295,000)

7.(8) GL: Wednesday: 2.1/2,696,000 (-245,000)

8.(7) DAYS: Wednesday: 2.1/2,625,000 (-519,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Wednesday: 1.5/1,823,000 (+124,000)

THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Thursday: 4.2/5,595,000 (-169,000)

2.(2) B&B: Thursday: 3.1/4,079,000 (+111,000)

3.(3) GH: Thursday: 3.0/3,828,000 (+127,000)

4.(5) OLTL: Thursday: 2.5/3,164,000 (-51,000)

5.(4) AMC: Thursday: 2.5/3,082,000 (-281,000)

6.(6) ATWT: Thursday: 2.3/2,939,000 (-88,000)

7.(8) DAYS: Thursday: 2.3/2,899,000 (+274,000)

8.(7) GL: Thursday: 2.0/2,599,000 (-97,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Thursday: 1.4/1,793,000 (-30,000)

FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Friday: 4.0/5,242,000 (-353,000)

2.(3) GH: Friday: 3.0/3,742,000 (-86,000)

3.(2) B&B: Friday: 2.8/3,690,000 (-389,000)

4.(5) AMC: Friday: 2.6/3,276,000 (+194,000)

5.(7) DAYS: Friday: 2.4/2,982,000 (+83,000)

6.(6) ATWT: Friday: 2.3/2,918,000 (-21,000)

7.(4) OLTL: Friday: 2.4/2,906,000 (-258,000)

8.(8) GL: Friday: 2.1/2,675,000 (+76,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Friday: 1.5/1,808,000 (+15,000)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Believe me Days numbers are nowhere near where Corday thought they would be with Hogan. GH is outshining them in the ratings. Days was the soap that was suppose to challenge B&B for the #2 spot and not GH. So what went wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Phoenix, let me say again I admire you for always being such a passionate advocate for your favorite soap!

I hope Corday and Sheffer know they have such devoted supporters!

It's my belief DAYS needs to concentrate on the big couples, and by that I mean John/Marlena, Bo/Hope, Steve/Kayla, Sami/Lucas AND either Jack/recast Jennifer, or Jack on his own and back permanently.

The younger couples, especially Shelle, just don't do it for me, but that's just a personal opinion not everyone will agree with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Don't forget the Anna Nicole Smith factor. The news channels that covered the hearings and Court TV all increased their ratings. Those ratings came from somewhere and it looks like they siphoned off soap viewers. And face it, right now ANS is the ultimate soap!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:blink:

NO days wasnt the only soap that fell,but days has been falling steadily.Days lost lots of characters.Yes some needed to go like carrie and austin,but hogan sheffer is not writing for his ATEAM:bo hope john and marlena.Why would u put these powerhouses on the backburner.Plus you still have to pay them.So you got someone like deidre hall sitting on the sidelines getting paid big bucks.Hogan better wake up before he gets the boot!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Re DAYS: Clearly, the constant focus on EJ, Willow, and the young set, while much better than SSM & Langan's teens of 1999-2002, is not driving in the ratings. Many long-time fans are gone, and those used to JER's reliance on plot-driven storytelling instead of mature and believable dialogue along with character-driven stories are getting even more bored by the minute. If the writers are waiting until summer to jump-start things, they've made a bad decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Of the so-called "contract" cast members, I'd venture to say these are recurring: Bryton James, Camryn Grimes, and (possibly) Michael Graziadei.  I've suspected since 2018 that Kate Linder and Christian LeBlanc are recurring.  And I believe we all know Miss Ordway is, because she said so. lol.  
    • Dante blaming Gio instead of his dweeb son and the other dweeb was just ridiculous. Gio's paternity story is going in circles with no reveal. I've already started fast forwarding Drew and his stupid ho Willow's story. Kristina's story is beyond dumb with no great payoff.
    • Sarah (with the English accent) isn't just some random character.  Sarah was once the housekeeper for Eliot Dorn and Margo Huntington.  One of the following 2 scenarios happened a few months ago: (1):  One night, while Margo wasn't at home, and while Oscar the Doorman wasn't at his post, a burglar sneaked into the private elevator, rode up to the penthouse, stole several thousand dollars worth of Margo's valuable diamonds and pearls, and tied-up Eliot Dorn and Sarah the Housekeeper, ensuring that Eliot and Sarah couldn't pursue the burglar back down to the lobby or phone the police to apprehend the burglar. OR --  (2): Eliot Dorn was SLEEPING with Sarah the Housekeeper, and the two of them conspired to steal Margo's jewelry and went on a lavish spending spree and then tied THEMSELVES up to make it look as though a burglary had occurred in the penthouse. Margo Dorn currently believes Scenario #1 occurred, and she's rather annoyed that the "incompetent police" haven't located her stolen jewels yet.  Eliot and Sarah know that Scenario #2 actually occurred.  When Sarah stopped by the Unicorn and saw Eliot kissing Raven Swift, Sarah snidely said, "Oh! This must be Mrs. Dorn!  Nice to meet you, Mrs. Dorn!" Sarah knew good & damn well Raven isn't "Mrs. Dorn" because Sarah worked for Margo Dorn on a daily basis for many months.  That was Sarah's not-so-subtle way of announcing, "I'll be paying a visit to District Attorney Logan Swift and letting him know that his wife is sleeping with you, and I'll be paying a visit to WMON to let Margo Huntington know that you're sleeping with Mrs. Swift!"  lol.     
    • The AMC hate came from Jamey Giddens/DC and their industry friends, IMO. For whatever reason I always felt they targeted the show, and it was wrong. AMC ratings were decent and even went up under Pratt (Yet, he was fired). The ratings were also good under Broderick and lowered out after her interim.  There was no reason to be upset with the show other than it being slow. They literally played it safe and did the best they could in 2010 and 2011. 
    • I have very detailed synopses of all 1976 storylines for the soaps from the Daytime Serial Newsletter. Please let me know if you are interested in a particular show and I will post it in the appropriate thread. As I stated they are very detailed, so I don't want to clutter up threads if posters are not interested.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy