Jump to content

Y&R: Victoria Rowell article


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

WOW! We can cuss on this board? :o

I DO NOT believe VR left because the her co-stars would not vote for her! BULLSHIT. :rolleyes:

I SO AGREE! MS is SO overrated its not funny! [!@#$%^&*]. <_<:angry:

Back on topic: I cant believe this and i am not happy with VR's choice too leave. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maybe there's some truth to the Rowell/Stafford hate.

I found this comment Vicky made about Michelle, which can be interpreted in many ways, I guess.

Victoria Rowell (on sharing scenes with Michelle Stafford on Y&R): We have great on-screen chemistry. Unfortunately, the writers aren’t writing us together. I don’t think Michelle wants to do comedic scenes. I will say this in her defence. When you put the energy that we put into something, and there’s no category supporting it at the Daytime Emmys - a comedy category, which we would win hands down - maybe it’s not pushing her in the direction she wants Phyllis to go in. I love working with her and I continue to ask for those scenes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's easy to take words or actions, twist them around, and make something bad out of it. See, I can take Jeanne Cooper's action for submitting herself into the pre-nom's, even though she had virtually nothing to, as cold, selfish, and abrupt. But I'm not. And just because her agent didn't deny the pre-nom debacle, doesn't mean he confirmed it either. So, why are we jumping to conclusions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If Brown is siding with Rowell, then you better add Hunter Tylo and maybe even John Lindstrom over to the Bregman/Stafford side. Now THAT would be interesting.

(Remember that shove & bickering that Kimberlin Brown and John Lindstrom did before presenting a SOD Award a few years back? I don't care what lame excuse she gave in SOD years later saying they were trying to create publicity for PC. Clearly, those two were PISSED at each other. Kinda funny, watching it.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The entire Pre-Noms were clearly playing favorites. They probably felt bad that Eileen Davidson was fired so they gave her a pity nomination. Darcy Rose Byrnes over Adrienne Leon and Davetta Sherwood? PUHLEASE! There is no defending these Pre-Noms!

I just find it sick that the show basically ran her off. Victoria has always been so devoted to Y&R and she pours her heart and soul into every scene, no matter how little. Compare that to the overrated Michelle Stafford who turned Phyllis into a GigglyHeffa this year.

No matter how bad the writing may have gotten for Dru, you cannot tell me that Rowell didn't give 200%. She, along with Jeanne Cooper and Jess Walton should be running this show. Y&R is going to have a huge, gaping hole without her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

DruRocks, I'm telling it like it is in regards to Stafford. She did a terrible job with Phyllis for most of the year, but obviously she's popular and works with a lot of actors so she got the nomination. If it weren't for the elevator scenes she'd have nothing to submit. As far as I'm concerned the Pre-Noms were 100% about who has the most friends and they SHOULD be ashamed of themselves.

Doesn't matter if Rowell submitted herself in Lead or Supporting because there is space in both categories. Jeanne Cooper did absolutely nothing last year, same for Eileen Davidson in Supporting. Rowell could take either of those spots, the other should go to Sharon Case who was phenomenal all year long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
    • Roger's return storyline may have been silly but Roger's return was what lead to GL's last golden era.  It was the combination of Roger's return and Robert Calhoun becoming EP that got GL to finally hit it's stride after some really bad years. It will always disappoint me that the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run didn't reflect the quality of the show.
    • He also gave some of the best episodes, like the episodes surrounding Doug's death. The problem with Days was that Ron had a horrible vision from he top. I don't feel the same for MVJ and nothing that has happened in all these months suggests she doesn't have a handle on the show. Now if it becomes an issue I'll acknowledge it, but I'm not seeing it so far.
    • Jean Hackney was awful and that lead to Ben's exit story which sucked. I liked Ben/Val together. Val's love for Ben was that of a grown woman moving on with her life and Ben's love for Val made him willingly decide to raise another man's children as his own.
    • It wasn't just a GL thing, it was an 80s thing. Opulent party scenes on soaps were very big back then. Even in regular episodes where people are just going to dinner they're dressed up like they're going to see royalty.
    • Just started the May 27 episode and first thing I see is that Willow got an ugly haircut since hte last time i watched   I dont have the context for how everthing went down but I know its all Lulu's fault which make her a bish for what she did to Gio
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy