Vee

Oh, for God's sake: (Yes, it's more wisteria.)

Get ready for Chris Wallace's Wet 'n Wild New Year's Eve!

I believe that's their claim, but I think they also implied in that same article they want to get away from 'editorializing about the partisanship in Washington,' which to me doesn't suggest they're ever going to stop courting the racist Republican base and begging for their approval.

Who among us wouldn't want to smell Brad Maule?

Is that what happened?? LOL I need to go back and look at that set.

It seems like this whole setup would give credence to the theory that but I can see Ron doing either. He always takes a character too far, then blames the audience and twists the knife. And often takes it out on other characters, so Abigail paying for it herself wouldn't shock me.

What in the absolute fùck are you talking about? I was opining on AMCOLTL's question, it has nothing to do with you. Two people respond to the same topic on here all the time. I've had enough of this, and I'm reporting it. Enjoy that and keep my name out of your mouth from now on, because I'll do it every single time you do this from hereonin, to make up for the last however many years in the last decade I've let you skate out of pity. Move on with your life. ETA: And don't worry, I screencapped it!

Supposedly he gave her the opportunity to sleep with him 'willingly,' or never walk the island freely outside of solitary confinement. But let's not kid ourselves: That's rape. That aside, there's also nothing about the way either Stavros was presented in the '80s or 2000s that indicated this was a man who didn't actively get violent with her. I'm sure he got violent and took her without that supposed 'consent' as well.

The dialogue in these Newman family scenes a few days ago is incredibly vague, bland and nondescript. "I thought Ashland left peacefully!" "I think [whoever wrecked this painting] was in a lot of pain." "Vic is a strong, proud woman." "What could have made her do this?" It's like they're talking about an acquaintance. There is no character to these characters, just expository detail.

It's Ron getting to do what he wanted to do with Franco on GH. He had wanted Roger Howarth's Franco to whisper in Carly's ear (I think) and reveal he had Michael raped after all when the Carly/Franco pairing went south, but got vetoed either by the network on Frank Valentini. When a character doesn't take, he tries to burn them down or enrage the audience or both.

Perhaps some good news. (Warning: Politico)

Oh, that's very classy.

He's fine on GH!

As we've said before: Everything happening with this show lately is real strange in terms of a series of major shifts.

Bye!

Oy gevalt.

God, the hick guy from Boston Common who lost his mind doing Yes Dear. I remember him. I liked Boston Common! But not necessarily him. I remember Liza Snyder on Yes Dear from the not very good Christina Applegate show Jesse. Christina and Bruno Campos were the only really good things about it. I'm not sure what happened to Campos though he did turn up on nip/tuck as the Carver. Snyder annoyed me back then too.

You may be right, though he did both on TP.

I can't totally hate According to Jim, though. It gave Melrose's own beloved Courtney Thorne-Smith another umpteen years of solid employment, and Jim Belushi did go on to do great work on Twin Peaks. I could swear I remember the cast or maybe just the lead of Yes Dear losing their shít and openly sparring with the critics who loathed them in print, lol.

Which became such a subgenre by the time of "Kevin Can Wait" that it led to the AMC dramedy "Kevin Can F**k Himself", which is doing two seasons. I personally don't think that project sounds like a work of heartbreaking genius, or something that needs to be more than a one-off episode on some other show or anthology, but it does have a point to make about that schlock.

In the 2000s TV critics acted like Patricia Heaton was Lucille Ball, Mary Tyler Moore and Roseanne rolled into one. I'm fairly certain I am not exaggerating this. The way they went on about her for endless column lengths in print you'd think she invented situation comedy and would reign until the end of broadcast. Everybody Loves Raymond was treated like it was the heir to all the great sitcoms and a legend in its own time. Now no one remembers the show, as far as I can tell anyway, and Heaton is all but a footnote. Baffling. Whatever LBT's flaws, and I'm sure there are many just based on the work I watched back in the day and have been recently, I think it's still a tremendous loss to CBS and to television in general to lose that very unique and singular female creative voice. We talked about it when her Moonves story first came out, how he blackballed her, and how that went hand in hand with the systematic deconstruction of all the female-centric programming at the network, which has had a cascading effect across network TV in general since. Today sites like Vulture, etc. rush to crown every new diverse or non-male voice that comes through the door as the next big TV/streaming auteur, hoping to remake the balance in record time, but few of them last long or have anything truly original to say. People like the Bloodworth-Thomasons did and they don't come along every day, even though we're constantly breathlessly told now they are right as their 13-episode orders are wrapping up and their shows are already burning out before the ends of seasons 1 or 2. That's not to say there aren't many of those new, more diverse voices who can last and stand the test of time, too. But I do think we should treasure what we have, or had.

Oh, now I'm intrigued. I'll give it a shot. I did read up on the Hagerty/Mahaffey thing and it is extremely bizarre. They originally wanted Hagerty, she wasn't available, so they recast, then brought her back, then dumped her again for the recast??

A lot of the talent worshipped Zucker and believed he was a genius. They still do. They were shocked and hurt by the public reaction to his firing and disgrace. I'll enjoy 'media reporter' Brian Stelter, who never reports on media scandals at CNN or about his friends until there's literally no other option, tapdancing around this fiasco for another several weeks. He also has a show on CNN+ I believe.

I don't fault you for feeling that way. But I also can't honestly say that if they decided to go whole hog, like Agnes and her proteges did at AMC, and like Frank and Ron had planned to do with many characters on GH in 2012 had the show been cancelled that year - if they did what @Bright Eyesjust suggested, going so far as to resurrect everyone from Bill and Laura to David Banning, presumably as part of yet another labyrinthian DiMera scheme against the people of Salem - and then used all that to reset the entire show, revamp the entire canvas and tone, and have these elder and veteran adult characters back as part of the foundation on a more mature DAYS with less fantasy: Would that be so bad? IMO, it worked for AMC.

Doesn't surprise me at all, tbh. It was Zucker's brainchild.