Vee

Meanwhile: Charlie Kirk and other right wing chuds are notably concerned about turnout, vote cannibalization in NV, AZ, etc.

As I said last week:

I called this a while ago. IF we win, you'll hear this kind of rationalization from a lot of people - oh, it was MSG/Puerto Rico, it was Vance, it was just Trump being Trump. And you won't just hear it from the right but also from mainstream media dudes and from coping far leftists and bad faith merchants of all kinds. Much like with Obama (until it became undeniable) they won't want to give an inch of credit to Kamala. We will have to force them.

It was posted, yes. Ralston almost never misses. And he is also a notorious stunt queen/engagement farmer, who had his new red followers bamboozled with lots of his usual dramatic antics for weeks.

Good lord.

Vance seems to be repositioning himself (not unlike at the VP debate), IMO:

I beat you to it! The Dixville Notch result is interesting. It matches 2012 and also indicates to me the Haley/Republican defector vote is a real thing on some level.

delete

Dick Van Dyke endorses Harris and reads a speech he read at an event with Martin Luther King in 1964.

Maybe naive of me re: tomorrow, but I am considerably more concerned about the violence after the election than the result. I also wouldn't be shocked if Musk does what some suspect: Black out Twitter if the numbers stop going Trump's way.

Things are going well at the Post:

I can't beat this, folks.

After hilariously vamping for drama for days, hours, minutes and seconds (something he is known for), Jon Ralston predicts NV for Harris.

We already commented on that nonsense days ago.

Have you ever heard of the five stages of grief?