Legendary Emmy-winning soap scribe PAMELA K. LONG comes to Brandon's Buzz! Wednesday, September 16, 2009 --- 10pm EDT / 7pm PDT!
#1
Posted 15 September 2009 - 11:01 AM
Brandon's Buzz Radio w/ PAMELA K. LONG
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
10pm EDT / 7pm PDT
www.blogtalkradio.com/brandonsbuzz
Other Replies To This Topic
#4
Posted 16 September 2009 - 02:13 PM
R Sinclair, on 16 September 2009 - 09:10 AM, said:
Next-day podcasts of the show are available at iTunes, and also, can be listened to from the show's website, www.blogtalkradio.com/brandonsbuzz, and from my blog, http://brandonsbuzz.com
#5
Posted 17 September 2009 - 01:20 AM
She seems to welcome the idea of coming back to daytime too, while many from that era of soaps seem to be done with that whole idea.
Anyway, great job Brandon!
#6
Posted 17 September 2009 - 01:21 AM
Y&RWorldTurner, on 17 September 2009 - 12:20 AM, said:
She seems to welcome the idea of coming back to daytime too, while many from that era of soaps seem to be done with that whole idea.
Anyway, great job Brandon!
Thanks so much for listening! I had a total blast speaking with this woman, and she didn't disappoint!
#9
Posted 17 September 2009 - 02:52 PM
That was a great interview and I especially loved hearing about Texas. I never knew that Patricia Kalember(Sisters,LOVING)was up for the role of Ashley.
She did have a recurring role on the soap as Meredith,Vicky Bellman's secretary at KVIK.
http://soapworldclas....com/topic/5132

Pam actually showed up on Texas in a non-speaking role one month before she showed up as Ashley.
http://soapworldclas....com/topic/5117

This is her first appearance as Ashley Linden:
This post has been edited by chuck89: 17 September 2009 - 02:54 PM
#10
Posted 17 September 2009 - 03:06 PM
I'll put in my (unreasonable) request for a transcript or little snippets of text--"highlights"! Some of this is selfish and personal (hearing impaired), but some of it is genuinely because I believe written transcripts would have even wider impact!
#12
Posted 17 September 2009 - 07:05 PM
I do know a lot about that era of GL in 1990-91 when Long (and many of her creations) left the show in quick succession, having sought out as much as I could about it in later years, wishing that I was old enough to have watched regularly and really been able to recognize just how GL evolved into Curlee/Demorest's show that I loved so much in the '90s. And I can attest, Long was definitely writing when Reva drove off the bridge. I can only assume she was being very gracious (and she's a master at it - the way she explained why she and JFP didn't mesh at OLTL was incredibly nice and yet probably at least 90% truthful). The conventional wisdom is that she was fired, and of course the new head writers were promoted from within her own staff, so I'm sure there were hard feelings. I'm still glad we got the Curlee-Demorest era, and although everyone (including Long, in this interview) likes to speculate about whether killing off Maureen led us to this point, I don't blame them for that and I actually think the two years or so when GL was vying for 4th or 5th in the ratings before Maureen died may have actually bought the show more time. If it had limped along in 8th place like it was by the time Long left (or worse, sunk even further with nothing to fill the vacuum left by Reva, et al's departure), Zimmer probably would have returned sooner and the stories for Reva would have probably gotten ridiculous sooner, as well. I think we probably would have reached the end even sooner. But it's too bad Long never found her niche in daytime again. She obviously has creativity and talent to spare.
On another note, does anyone know Jeff Ryder's story? I had no idea he had been a network exec at NBC before writing GL with Long in the mid-80s, and he sounds like quite a character, from her shoe-throwing story. I was also reminded of what Nancy Curlee said about him in that interview a few months ago, how he got "all of the blame and none of the credit" at that time. What did he get blamed for? Phasing out the Bauers and the Reardons, or what? What did he do that gave the impression that he was more to blame for the less successful components of the show? And what has he done since GL? He doesn't appear to have an entry in the writer/director forum, and there's nothing else listed about him on IMDB besides writing GL and "special thanks" on a few projects that sound like recent made for tv movies.
Anyway, again, great job. And what a travesty that fans have had to take it upon themselves to go out of their way to track down and interview two of the most influential living head writers in the show's history and interview them, while Soap Opera Digest wouldn't even devote a cover to GL in its final week on the air. This is why soaps (and the soap press) are dying. Now is the time for the mainstream soap press to be using their circulation and their clout in the industry (if either of those are even worth anything anymore) and give a platform to people who know first-hand what made soaps successful back in this genre's glory days. Well, at least someone is practicing journalism, even if they're not the ones getting paid to do it.
This post has been edited by DeliaIrisFan: 17 September 2009 - 07:07 PM
#13
Posted 17 September 2009 - 07:11 PM
I wish someone would ask Long if she hated the Bauers. And ask for her opinion of Trish Lewis, who seemed to be the one Lewis she didn't write for.
#14
Posted 17 September 2009 - 07:40 PM
CarlD2, on 17 September 2009 - 08:11 PM, said:
I wish someone would ask Long if she hated the Bauers. And ask for her opinion of Trish Lewis, who seemed to be the one Lewis she didn't write for.
Ah, I see. He stayed on after she had left. Yes, I've heard that era was kind of a black hole book-ended by Long's stints, which may have been polarizing but at least, by definition, had their fans. Still, Ryder may have brought something equally important to the mix that was gone when she returned without him. It never made sense to me why GL did worse in the ratings in Long's second stint - when at least there were old favorites like Holly and Roger and Peter Simon's Ed, and new characters like Harley and Blake, all of whom were front and center during the 1991-92 renaissance - in addition to the Shayne-Lewises, et al, who seemed to eat the show alive in the mid-80s.
I think Brandon did ask her about the Bauers, and she side-stepped it by saying that viewers didn't know at the time how ill Charita Bauer was IRL and that they couldn't utilize her more. Which of course doesn't explain why she wrote out Mike, Hillary, et al. (Interesting what she said about the decision to kill off Reva's mother by later regimes - "Why would you kill someone's mother? Send her out of town if you don't like her, but to kill her?" - when sending them out of town never to be heard from again was exactly what she did to Mike and Hope.) But it's not like she was going to come right out and say she hated them, even if she were grilled about it - I think what was great about this interview, speaking as someone who is ambivalent about Long, is that he let her speak for herself. I know there were holes in some of her explanations for things, but I also saw her in a different light than I have in the past, and got a sense of the imagination and heart that she brought to this show once.
This post has been edited by DeliaIrisFan: 17 September 2009 - 07:43 PM
#15
Posted 18 September 2009 - 10:01 AM
I intend to sit down this weekend and transcribe the highlights of the interview, so that those who haven't heard it yet can read what Pam Long had to say about her daytime experiences.
For those who haven't heard this or any of my interviews, you can find all 35 (so far) episodes of my show in the radio archive at Brandon's Buzz: http://brandonsbuzz....o-the-archives. (In searching for the show, many of you have been clicking on the banners that my pal JoAnn makes to help me advertise the show, when in fact, the shows themselves can be found in the radio archive at the top of the page.)
Thanks again for listening, you guys!
#17
Posted 21 September 2009 - 07:15 AM
After the Dobsons successful 5 year stint in which they revamped the show and took it to an hour,Doug Marland built upon what they had established.Ed,Mike,Hope,Hilary,Alan,Justin,Jackie,Ben,Eve,Ross etc continued as major players alongside Morgan,Kelly,Nola,Vanessa,etc
After Pat Falken Smith and L Virginia Browne started to tinker with the show,Long came in and revamped,basically eliminating most of Marland and the Dobsons characters.
Hilary was killed off,Mike written out,Bert's death ignored for a year,Justin,Eve,Katie all gone.Nola and Quint were given nothing to do and dropped.
Characters like Tony and Annabelle and Jim were used for plots and dropped.
New characters were interacting with each other and the show was moving further away from a solid core.
Not that what was happening wasn't interesting,it just weakened the show overall.
#19
Posted 22 September 2009 - 10:15 AM
And it says something about her writing creatively that she created one of the most iconic GL characters ever in Reva Shayne. However, I do believe that if GL could have tied Lisa Brown down to long-term contracts, Nola Reardon would have given her a run for her money.
#20
Posted 22 September 2009 - 10:53 AM

Sign In
Register
Help

MultiQuote







