Jump to content

Bush Hits An All New Low Approval Rating


crc

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I never said the Medicare issue was perfect..its not. I work in the health insurance industry, I see first hand how it is going. But it is something. Eight years of Clinton never had any affect on healthcare, education, boarder control, national security....so having something be done, IS something to be satisfied with.

Medicare is not that complicated to be honest with you. Since I work in the field and help people get signed up for it...it can be challanging but in the end, it helps them and thats good. Will it help everyone? Of course not. We are not built for that in this country.

If all you want to do is complain about everything instead acknowledging things are getting looked at and worked on thats your issue.

What have you lied about? No one here has lied as they let Michael Moore do the lieing for them. Bush or people in his administration did not LIE to get us into war and my brother, who is serving this THIRD tour in Iraq feels it is a slap in the face to all of the soliders here and from other countries to have that said about their commander in chief. EVERYONE...Democrats and Republicans, other countries said Iraq had the weapons...he used them, they were there. That is a fact. You can not cover that up. Go back and see what Clinton, Daschle, Kerry and the rest had to say....they felt the same as the President did..before and after he was elected.

Were we wrong...sure looks like it. But that does not make a lie. If 9-11 never happened, the war would have never happened. More patience and time would have prevailed...but when you are attacked for no reason...you are on your guard...and right or wrong, THANKFULLY someone was looking out to protect us instead of taking the whole "oh well, lets just let it blow over" approach.

Being from a military family, I do not like loss of life. And sorry to tell you, the President does not sit back and laugh when a service member dies. NO ONE who serves as President want to send people over to get killed for no reason. If you think that, its a sad sad day in your world.

Like I said, to disagree, thats one thing...but all of the hateful, misguided comments here are horrid and I am glad that those in the majority here including the MODS think it is ok to just plain flat out lie and disrespect. but if I call someone a buffon...damn I get a warning! Really classy and really mature.

If anyone here could hold an intelligent converstation based on FACTS and not plotlines from Michael Moores movies, it might be a worthwhile converstation. But since we have to deal with hotheads who would rather discredit and destroy instead of looking at the big picture....its too impossible.

I am done replying. I let my brother read these posts...him and his troops in Iraq....its really sad to hear the response from them. But luckily, they are mature and keep their mouth shut and do what they do best...protect all of us...even those that slap them in the face for doing what they do.

Bush lied so soliders die? You lie and they die as well, but thats your right because they fight overseas, here and everywhere for you to speak the way you do. Thank God for them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Contrary to what you think, we support the troops. But we're not supporting Bush's choice for getting us into this war. It's all about oil, and finishing what his daddy didn't. And it's sickening to see so many men and women losing their lives for this travesty. They're not fighting for freedom, they're fighting for a man's personal vendetta and it's not right.

BTW, I think Michael Moore is a jackass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sure he did. He said that Iraq had WMDs... Not true. He said that Iraq was tied to Al Qaeda, by default that's a bunch of bullshit because why would the Ba'ath party support extremist Islam? Yes, Hussein isn't exactly the nicest ruler, but if Bush is going to be all Operation Freedom and [!@#$%^&*], then he shouldn't be shocked that people are asking him about Darfur since he declared himself the world's police. He had his own agenda from the get go, and he's all about benefitting himself and his own. He doesn't care about who gets hurt in the process. He doesn't care that the troops are dying so that his buddies up in Halliburton gets more money into their pockets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm only addressing your Medicare and so-called "you are all misinformed" response. Whether you continue to read or not is up to you. I did not vote for Bush, but when I heard about the new Medicare prescription drug plan, I was thinking, "Ok, maybe he's onto something. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt." Silly of me. Why are you trying to act like Medicare is not complicated? Because you happen to work in a the medical field and you've been trained on the ins and outs? How is the average disabled and/or elderly person supposed to know these things? Many people received NO help whatsoever until it made the national news how screwed up this new plan was. Once the issue was jammed into everyone's face, THEN came the help getting people signed up....if they could make it to their local pharmacies and SS offices, of course. If you can't get there, oh well. It IS challenging and that's exactly the way it was designed to be.

So I'm complaining because the Medicare plan is subpar? Funny, I thought that's what we're supposed to do to let the powers that be know we're not happy and this isn't working. Just because an issue is "looked at" doesn't mean it's been solved, or at the very least, improved for that matter.

I dislike when someone doesn't agree with another on a political view, that they are labelled as misguided misinformed, hateful, or as "having issues". Wow, so when people disagree with you, they're buffoons? :blink: I mean wow, reading your posts, I'm surprised I was intelligent enough to score a Federal job, TWICE. Yeah, I was actually a Federal employee and had no complaints. But things changed, for the worse, so damn right, I will complain and call our President on his misdeeds and lies. I'm not a hateful person and neither is anyone else here that I've come across in the months since I found this site. What happens is people will disagree and have their own opinions on topics in EVERY forum here. Do I hate you or think your words are hateful because you believe in Bush while I do not? Not at all. Do I despise the fact that you seem to think anyone who doesn't think like you is an idiot? Why yes...yes I do. According to you, we are just misinformed, misguided fools. <_<

You are not the only person with family members in the military. I have plenty of cousins, uncles and most of all, my mother, an administrative nurse, who just turned 53 yesterday and she has been training because she could be deployed at any minute. Just because these soldiers are there, have been there and come home, or could soon be deployed there does not mean they agree with their reasons for being there. They know BS when they smell it, just like all the members or Bush's staff that have handed in their resignations to "spend more time with their families" :rolleyes: and the millions that actually DID vote for him that will tell you now to your face he has screwed up royally. I am friends with and worked with so many who believed in Bush that are now singing a different tune. But I guess 71% of the country is completely out of touch and misguided too? I bet you weren't saying that when those SAME people voted for your guy the last election. :lol:

You're not the only person with an opinion and to tell you the truth, this is the first board I've ever been to where people NOT happy with Bush were in the majority. For years all over the Internet, it's been QUITE the opposite and I've dealt with it. Put your big kid drawers on and deal with the fact that you've encountered a load of people who refuse to be spoon fed by the current Administration. icon111ah.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I will not address Dru, obviously that would be like talking to a wall.

Bree...this war is not about oil If it were...we would be taking the oil, using the oil. We aren't. Agreed about Michael Moore, but he does have the right to make a movie...even if 95% of it is fantasy on his part. This war was not started to finish was his "daddy" didn't do. The first Gulf war completed the mission it set out to do...remove Saddam from Kuwait.

Clinton was lobbing missles and so on at Iraq all during his administration....obviously HE thought something was not right there...and he even said that..as did EVERYONE ELSE! But its ok for Saddam to kill, gas, murder his own people...its not our business....but Africia...that is our business?

I think our asses should be helping out anyone we can...thats what we do. Not just because we can...but if there is a need...we should.

The troops are fighting for freedom. Saddam had plans to attack us...he hated us...but most of all, his country was just simply another Hitler style country waiting to grow...and look what happens when you let people like Hitler go...thankfully someone learned a lesson from that.

Our troops (and you better ask the troops...the on the ground, proud to be in the service troops) they will tell you they are fighring for freedom..ours and the Iraqis.

And Danni....saying the country had WMD's and then not finding any is NOT a lie. They were there, he used them, EVERYONE in the world "knew" he had them. So if I tell you that I set my keys down on the counter, but someone moved them to the couch..I would be lieing? Get real.

And you better bet Bush had an agenda...he is President..every President has an agenda. And if he wanted to attack Iraq JUST BECAUSE...he had plenty of time to do it before he did.

BUt then again...only the US should be free..because only in the US would be !@#$%^&*] about helping another country gain what we have...how selfish is that. And your comment about how he does not care who gets hurt is an utter LIE. ANY President who has to make that choice has to live with it...and it hurts.

DOnt you think JFK, Nixon and LBJ were torn up about Vietnam? Any President, from what ever party is not going to send our troops out to get killed and be happy about it. You should raelly be ashamed of yourself for that comment. That was really unthinkable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I normally tend to stay out of political threads just because I realize how ugly it can get.

I for one, do not agree with the war. I do believe that we were mislead and I do believe that removing Sadam from power in Iraq was personal and not a "political move in the best interest of the Iraqi people". Does that make me a bad person for believing so? No, it doesn't. It is my right as an American. It a right that is afforded to me and I'm glad that I'm able to say that. People like my grandfather, uncles, cousins, aunts and everyone else's family members put their lives on the line to protect such rights as free speech.

Do you think that in order to support the troops you must support the war as well? If you do, then well, I'll just keep that to myself. Contrary to popular belief, it IS possible to support the troops and not support the war. I have helped young children write letters to the troops (I myself have even written a few), I've helped send care packages and I've helped rally support for the soldiers at Fort Dix here in NJ.

For the record, Michael Moore is a jackass, doesn't make him a liar though. I for one, due to my love of political science watch a A LOT of news programs and I have a very good memory when it comes to that stuff. I've watched MANY programs where those in the Bush Administration have contradicted themselves as to "why we went to war". It's ashame that these people can't stick to one story.

I look at a man like General Colin Powell who, in my opinion, made himself look like an ass after he defended the US's decision to go into Iraq and hit it home that there were WMD's in Iraq only for there not to be any. IF the weapons were there, they weren't when our troops got there. That makes it a lie that he had them. I'm not saying he didn't, but the facts speak for itself.

I am one of those 71% of people who don't approve of President Bush. I'm not one of those people who believe that "As Americans, we should support our President in whatever decision that he makes". We don't need the blind leading the blind.

See, that is your opinion. Not everyone believes that the comments in this thread are hateful and misguided. When you call someone a buffon, that is offensive and grounds for a warning. Is calling people names mature? No it's not. Look in the mirror before you make a statement like that Kwing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You are mistaken. I was not calling anyone in this post anything...but yet, you turned it around to call me a name..really classy and mature.

I am a political science major, who watches just as many shows as you, I am sure..on all networks..not just one or two. I am in tune with the world..not only through the news, but through Democratic and Republican lawmakers in my town and state. I talk to the troops, I talk to the anti-war folks as well. I base my feelings and thoughts on the whole, not a part.

Until you start looking outward, there is no point talking to you. Your opinions are fine, but until you have a just argument and just proof and just information....its all just blah blah blah.

Go ahead...HATE a President. Real mature. Real American. I do not like all this President does. I have many issues where we differ. I voted for him the second time, NOT the first time and I am glad I did.

Its all in what you think is important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:lol: Because I stand steadfast in what I believe and what I've experienced through this presidency? :huh: I could say the same for you. Why not respond? I did not call you any names, nor did I spout any hate. But because I don't agree with your beliefs I don't rate a response. Funny how anyone who doesn't share your mindset is immature and there's no point in talking to them. :lol: You're like a little kid who doesn't want to play because everyone else doesn't want to play the same game he does. I see. Fine with me. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually I was not going to respond because although you say your issue is Medicare, you go on to berate a President and the administration. Sure you do not like the Medicare plan, something that no one has touched ever until now, you go on to berate and belittle the President.

You know Congress approved this plan....

So, I did not respond because of that. I appreciate your interest in the medicare debate, but the math was not adding up. (fuzzyh math!) haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No, no. In my first post, I said I was only going to address the Medicare issue because everyone else in the thread had already covered the rest. :lol: Get it right. :P After the next post by YOU, other topics were unfolded and addressed because I was responding to things you'd said. So, my issues eventually went past Medicare because of YOUR responses.

I've berated and belittled the president because I don't feel he has done a good job through nearly 6 years in office? I'm one of MILLIONS who are displeased. Are we supposed just sit here and smile and nod my approval? I suppose you sat quietly in your seat when Clinton was in office and you disapproved of him? Why do you condemn those that oppose your opinions, as well as belittle and berate? You belittle everyone is this thread everytime you post and use your "holier than thou" metaphors. You know EXACTLY what I'm talking about too. They're sprinkled in every one of your posts.

Have you looked in that mirror yet?

Hey, I have to go. Y&R is on, so that trumps politics....for now. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Kwing, I think it would be in your best interest to just stop replying and ignore this thread.

If you are so angry, make a thread praising Bush. Don't come in here and attack other posters. You are the one being immature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Dru, I appreciate your candor and your tongue-in-cheek way of talking. Even if you use words I would prefer not to be used or references..thats your deal..but you do it with class and I appreciate that. You are a good person, even if we disagree politically! Thanks

I will not be responding to these posts anymore because the moderators on this board have made it clear that mocking, berating, being juvinile and classless is permitted, and while I may have gone down that road a couple of times, I would never expect the people in 'so called' power to resort to such classless and immature tactics.

So on that note, I will stop using my free speech! You win liberals! You WIN!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't see the mocking and berating unless you are referring to your own approach. And even then I can see worse on any political panel show. Your free speech? No one has prevented you from expressing an opinion but your rage at opposing opnions might suggest that in your opinion, free speech is only for people who agree with you.

29%. Get used to it.

All you've done is puff yourself up here and not really addressed any issue.

The issue is 29% approval. WHY? I think this thread proves why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Leslie and her family are from Chicago? Anita's background also includes being a former Chi-Town native? Might they connect this and go somewhere with it?
    • Honestly who's to say Leslie even birthed Eva, I mean she's a liar, I wouldn't believe a word she says about Eva being Ted's(or hers)
    •   1. 11/1/83 cast/set list:  

      Please register in order to view this content

          The "11/2/83" video you posted of Ruth Buzzi's scenes includes Roman and Hope in them, meaning the video you posted is actually 11/1/83, since Roman and Hope aren't in 11/2/83.   2. The video you posted of "11/2/83" has scenes with Roman and Hope. As you can see from my cast/set list, Roman and Hope are not in the 11/2/83 episode (see above note):   4573...11/2/83: Cast: Mickey, Julie, Doug, Maggie, Neil, Don, Marie, Alex, Liz, Andre as Tony, Gwen, Chris, Eugene, Sandy, Letitia, Charlene, Mrs. Whiting, Wanda/Guard, Dave, Delia, Saleslady # 1, Saleslady # 2, Figure in Dark, Raven/animal, Cats/animals, Birds/animals.   2.  11/3/83 :My video collection starts with 11/4/83. so I don't have the 11/1/83 or 11/3/83 video, but in addition to the cast/set list for 11/3/83, here is also the parking clearance call sheet for that day, showing Ruth was not only in the cast/set list but did work that day:     They even had hired the animal trainer and all the animals for the day, so It's sort of a certainty that her scenes were not cut that day, or it would have been a big waste of the budget. 3. As for 11/7/83, I just fast-forwarded through that whole episode myself. Letitia is in it from start to finish. It's her big final episode where she is killed. She starts the episode saying "Eugene, are you there?" In the next act, Marlena shows up and meets Letitia's lion. Later in the episode, Letitia is killed by "Eugene" (the Salem Slasher in a Eugene mask).   So, as we can see from your own post, the 11/2/83 date you have listed on that video is incorrect, since Hope and Roman are in that video but not in the 11/2/83 episode.It seems the dates you have on all your early November 1983 episodes are incorrect.   When you post videos and suggest that my data is incorrect, do you not first compare who is in the scenes and see if that matches who is in the episode? You didn't do that with the "11/2/83" episode, which based on Roman and Hope being in it means that is actually 11/1/83. Best to do something like that first before suggesting my data and research is incorrect.
    • Within the Dupree family, I predict Vernon/Anita will be conflicted about what to do about Bill and his role in the whole Ted/Silk Press Sheila situation... especially since Bill knows where the particular bone about Martin is buried. Dani, Chelsea, and Naomi's reactions to what Bill possibly did isn't hard to guess.. but Hayley's reactions will be interesting to hear.  Especially given her recent pregnancy scare.. she might not be so much on Bill's side, or she'll totally surprise us and be totally on Bill's side.   Either way, I think Martin's secret will be the main focus in May sweeps.. with the fall out of the Eva secret playing out in the background... while the Joey/Vanessa/Doug thing continues to boil/develop.
    • Hotel was The Love Boat on land but a little soapier. I will forever maintain that Hotel was a time slot hit. I don't believe that 1983/84 Hotel was a better show than Knots Landing.
    • The Golden Girls key episodes by ratings September 14, 1985: The Engagement (series premiere), rating 25.0, #1 Season highs February 22, 1986: Adult Education, rating 25.2 October 4, 1986: Ladies of the Evening, rating 27.3 November 8, 1986: Isn't it Romantic, rating 27.3 February 6, 1988: My Brother, My Father; rating 24.6 November 26, 1988: Sophia's Wedding (Part 2), rating 24.3, #1 September 23, 1989: Sick and Tired (Part 1) (season 5 premiere), rating 23.5 January 12, 1991: Sisters of the Bride, rating 19.3 May 9, 1992: One Flew Out of the Cuckoo's Nest (series finale), rating 18.9 Season lows October 19, 1985: The Triangle, rating 18.6 May 16, 1987: Empty Nests (season 2 finale), rating 17.8 February 20, 1988: And Ma Makes Three, rating 18.0 April 29, 1989: Rites of Spring, rating 18.7 April 28, 1990: All Bets are Off, rating 15.8 February 16, 1991: Older and Wiser, rating 11.6 October 26, 1991: Mother Load, rating 10.9 Ten highest-rated episodes October 4, 1986: Ladies of the Evening, rating 27.3 November 8, 1986: Isn't it Romantic, rating 27.3 January 3, 1987: The Sisters, rating 27.0 November 22, 1986: Family Affair, rating 26.8 January 10, 1987: The Stan Who Came to Dinner, rating 26.6 January 24, 1987: Before and After, rating 26.4 February 28, 1987: Whose Face is This, Anyway?; rating 25.8 September 27, 1986: End of the Curse (season 2 premiere), rating 25.6 November 15, 1986: Big Daddy's Little Lady, rating 25.3 February 22, 1986: Adult Education, rating 25.2 Ten lowest-rated episodes October 26, 1991: Mother Load, rating 10.9 September 28, 1991: The Case of the Libertine Belle, rating 10.9 October 19, 1991: Where's Charlie?, rating 11.0 February 15, 1992: Ebbtide VI: The Wrath of Stan, rating 11.3 February 16, 1991: Older and Wiser, rating 11.6 December 14, 1991: The Pope's Ring, rating 11.7 April 25, 1992: Home Again, Rose (Part 1); rating 12.3 October 5, 1991: Beauty and the Beast, rating 12.7 November 2, 1991: Dateline: Miami, rating 12.7 December 7, 1991: From Here to the Pharmacy, rating 12.8
    • The timing is strange, though. How far in advance would they normally be on location? The Achille Lauro hijacking was on October 7, 1985. Nancy had arrived in Egypt in the storyline by October 18. But the character of Hawk, Chris' Native American friend from Arizona, had already appeared onscreen by September and brought a letter telling Chris to be in Egypt by October 25th.  Why did they already have the link to Arizona before the reason to cancel the shoot in Egypt?  The dust and the jar it came in were from Egypt though. Nancy bought it there and sent it to Mac as a gift before she came back to the states and followed Chris to Arizona.
    • Actually that is not what happened. Nor is the timing right for it to have been. We learned from a WOST interview with Pete Lemay  in 2006, which can be found on YT, that it was Fred Silverman's idea to do the 90 minute show. I don't know how much you know about him but he had these amazing successes as head of daytime at both ABC & at CBS. Then he came to NBC where basically everything he touched turned NOT TO GOLD but to shite. Some of the most expensive shows ever produced up to that time were huge flops. Although even he, like a broken clock, could be right on occasion. However, as we know, he was not right about the 90 minute show. As a matter of fact, afterward,  NBC programmers, who worked FOR him, were asked why they did it & they were quoted as saying it was because they couldn't think of anything else to try. It was a stupid idea from a man who had reached the point where he was throwing anything at the wall to see if it would stick.
    • Tamara Tunie at Baltimore event May 10, 2025 https://www.lewismuseum.org/event/a-lewis-table-talk-with-tamara-tunie/ https://www.instagram.com/p/DJH0ZQayihs/ Reginald F. Lewis Museum of Maryland African American History & Culture, Baltimore lewismuseum

      Please register in order to view this content

      Clear your calendar for the Lewis Museum's post gala celebration! On Saturday, May 10 at 2pm, we're bringing the elegance, wisdom, and brilliance of Tamara Tunie to The Lewis! From her powerful performances throughout her career, to her bold new project “Beyond the Gates,” this is your chance to hear it all—up close and personal. Hosted by the always fabulous media personality LaDawn Black, this conversation will be real, inspiring, and unforgettable. Kick off your Mother's Day weekend and come on down to The Lewis. Come ready to be moved, motivated, and in great company! Saturday, May 10 2:00-4:00pm Reginald F. Lewis Museum Register today by visiting the link in our bio! #thereginaldflewismuseum #lewismuseum #thelewis #beyondthegates #tamaratunie #lawandordersvu                            
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy