Jump to content

Halloween: The Missing Years


Roman

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'll reserve judgment until I actually see it. Sounds like from what I've read on various sites that the screenwriter has respect for the Halloween series, so we'll see. Nothing can be worse that Resurrection, except maybe part 5. Barf worthy sequels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

7 & 8 operate under the assumption that 4-6 didn't happen.

H20 didn't contradict 4-6. It was an easy assumption to make that Laurie faked her death and started over as Kara Tate. Why she left Jamie Lloyd behind is anyone's guess. It also went on to make a point that Loomis had hunted Myers for years before he died.

Resurrection actually goes full out and contradicts 4-6 by placing everyone in a brokedown Myers house, when the Strode family had moved into it in Halloween 6 just 7 or so years prior.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is going to be, what? The third time line created in this franchise? I just want one film to tie all these stories together, give us some great suspense, and end this thing. As much as many people feel that H2 did not liveup to the original (I like it alot more now than I did then), it and H4 are still ten times better than anything that has came after H4. H2 fell short because 1- he killed an innocent neighbor for no reason, and 2 - how many hospitals have you been in where the lights are turned off, and has a skeleton staff, even for the overnight shift?

I'll also wait until iit's made to pass judgement, but it just seems to me that Hollywood has now gone prequel crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

I just watched H2O. I've had it for a long time, but I don't think I've watched it once since I bought it. So, it's been since it was in the theaters since I saw it, I think. I have to say, IMO, it is one of the smartest, most clever, and most suspenseful slasher movies out there. I love it how it throws out the formula and how smart Jamie Lee Curtis' character is.

Resurrection was absolutely one of the worst sequels I've ever seen - next to Jason X. I was so pissed when they re-wrote the ending of H2O. That was a PHENOMENAL end to the series. I can't believe Resurrection even made it into production. What a shame! The franchise really went out on top quality-wise with H2O.

JMO!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

H20 is my favorite as well Mike. The only thing missing from that movie is Loomis, which they had no control over because of Pleasence's death. Still, his absense is quite noticeable. I do like how smart Laurie became at the end. The ONLY scene I had a major problem was after Laurie spotted John and his friend outside the school. They get back to the school and Michael Myers parks the car RIGHT BEHIND THEM, yet they don't see it!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

H20 is definitely the best sequel of the series. It has suspense, Jamie Lee Curtis and lots of shocking moments. Too bad it's barely 90 minutes. If there's going to be another sequel, it should exist in that timeline, not mention Ressurection, and involve Laurie's son John.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know something interesting? Kevin Williamson wrote the original treatment to H20 and it was SO MUCH better than the finished product. It actually tied together all the movies quite brilliantly, showed Laurie dealing with abandoning her daughter and a somewhat different group of characters. It's available online somewhere, google 'horror scripts' or something like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When I watched H2O,I didn't like it that when she told the teacher she was seeing,that he killed her friends and NOT one mention of Jamie her daughter.I wonder WHY they didn't have her mention her daughter in this movie.I noticed in the fourth movie when Michael was going through the box in Jamie's closet,the picture of Laurie was from the first Halloween when she was waiting for her friend to pick her up and take her to Tommy's house to babysit.IF I remember correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The only thing that I can think of is that H6 did so poorly at the B.O., and it is not one of the better sequels, in fact it's one of the worst, that they just decided (wrongly, I might add), that they would just forget 4-6 and just focus on H20.

Ressurrection was so bad, whoever thought of that crap hopefully is so long gone from Hollywood by now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's well known that H20 takes place after Halloween 2, nothing else happened. Danielle Harris (Jamie) was offered a role in H20, but they wouldn't give her the $5,000 minimum so she turned them down.

My favorite sequel is Halloween 4, it was well written and tied into the original plot nicely. I also lobsterloved H20 though it did have its problems. It was scaled back like the original which I loved. Halloween 6 had potential to be good, but with Donald Pleasence's death and all the cut scenes, it didn't work out. I head the unofficial Producers Cut is MUCH better.

As for this new prequel, it sounds like a dreadful idea. They will no doubt have to rewrite history to make this work and I have no interest in seeing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love H$ becuase it was technically well made, and had a ton of suspense. I really liked everything about it. H2 was a good follow-up, and I liked how it takes place on the same night, but it had three problems.

1. Michael would not have killed the teenage girl at the beginning. She had nothing to do with him getting Laurie.

2. There was too much of Michael being seen in this movie. He was great in the first one where you saw him so little, you didn't know where he was.

3. How many hospitals have you been to where the lights were turned off, and they had one doctor, two nurses, a candy striper, one security guard, and hardly no patients?

H6 could have been so much better. H20 was better, even though it took too long for it to build up, and seemed to end much too soon. I don't even consider Resurrection as a part of the series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Show starts soon. Wonder if we will get the Voice saying "The role of Ted Richardson is now being played by Keith Robinson" and if they'll update the intro
    • I initially thought BTG was going for the Duprees being (somewhat) like the Kennedy family- wealthy and politically influential. And Martin's accident being like how Chappaquiddick (Link) caused Ted Kennedy to cancel his plans to run for president in the 1970s. But now it seems to have more layers that that, so I have no idea.
    • The episodes uploaded today by the YT channel have been done through the end of November 1985 and what a mess we have in the Liza/Sunny/Hogan/Lloyd/Estelle story. I think it would have been easier to gradually bring Hogan/Sunny back together.. maybe even addressing the toxic situation and trying to work through it.   Unrelated to all that, I see that Gary Tomlin has attempted to reset the show to where it was when he left at the end of 1983.  He really seems obsessed with regressing Wendy as a character after the progress/evolution of her character post 1983.. with her sleeping with her mother's new boyfriend.   Based on what I've watched of the show online... the one consistency was the mother/daughter relationship between Stephanie/Wendy... and even though Stephanie was recast, I think violating that relationship was a mistake. I can see why Tomlin didn't last long in this stint as head writer.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • I don't think that would be the reason tbh. Thinking about it, it's probably storyline related - I could see bio mom / dad eventually turning up (or maybe it's June as speculated) and wanting the children back. I could also see it being a part of the fall-out of Martin's secret being revealed now that he's backed down from a presidential campaign - his and Smitty's ability to be parents comes into question, which the bio parents use. They might've wanted the kids to be at a age where they could reliably speak for themselves what they prefer, but also have enough memories of their bio parent(s) not doing a good job. I'd also think that they might want to avoid having the image of this gay couple keeping a mother away from her small children, as it might skew the viewer to sympathise too much in one direction. 
    • Something self-defense is my guess, and I have a feeling maybe he was protecting someone close to him and the optics looked bad so Vernon/Anita covered it up (my guess maybe he was protecting Vernon/Anita).
    • If Reginald had had more dimensions he probably wouldn't have been killed off and Carl might not have been brought back to fill the international supervillain role. I think though that the Loves were also severely damaged by the way Nicole and Peter were made iredeemable and written out. I definitely feel that loss more than the loss of Reginald, primarily since they were good characters to begin with and were only ruined during this period.   
    • What if they were originally cast as Vanessa and Doug's twins and then were moved to Samantha/Tyrell when the show decided to delay introducing the twins? It's a shame they didn't stick with the original plan. BTW, does anybody have any new speculation on what Martin's secret will be? Brandon is hinting nobody is guessing it. Initially I thought it would be something where he was drunk and killed somebody or something like that but now I'm feeling like maybe it wasn't completely his fault. I don't get the vibe they're going to take him in a dark direction anymore.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy