Jump to content

BTG: March 2025 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Just thinking back to Wk 1 and the introduction to some characters.

Ashley and Derek were just there talking about her first day at work, and we had no idea how they fit into the canvas.

Jacob and Naomi got the sexay intro in the bedroom.

Instead maybe the 4 of them should have met for a breakfast to wish Ashley well on the first day. That would have established all 4 of them better. We would have learned their jobs, that they were friends and the connection to the Duprees.

Cady seems completely superfluous at this point.

As for Martin/Smitty. Every other couple has been allowed varying degrees of affection but not the gays. I'm not buying the 'relationship is tense' excuse. What better way to show that than either spouse attempting to initiate some romance and the other rebuffing them. 

And that leading to an argument about their unsatisfactory sex life.

Instead it's like they dusted off scripts from 'How to Survive A Marriage' from 1974.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I mean collectively and from a Have-Not...something Bill is not being inside the gate. Which I assume from the above complaints...is what is really being asked for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Okay, I think it must count from Bill but we can call it from someone inside the gates & look for a townie to do it later. Have both!

That's rich. They should have that argument. I'm sure Smitty is not getting nearly enough physical affection!!!!

Oh, no, no, not that! These are people who have made a lot of good solid decisions. No way they'd pull a move as boneheaded as that!!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I kind of loved that. I think Bill sneered a couple times when saying "Dupree." At least that points out the Dupree delusion that they're somehow more special than anyone else.

I thought I was the only one who remembered HTSAM. What an odd, awkward show that tried so hard to be edgy and sexy and cool. I remember being really angry that NBC canceled Return to Peyton Place (which I thought was good) for that mess.

I'm not either, and I'm side-eyeing the whole deal. I'll give them some time, but if they avoid gay guys showing real affection, I'm calling it out bigtime.

If they want us to care about this couple -- both as a relationship and as parents -- they need to give us more.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

The high tea was February 20 in Los Angeles, a Paramount/CBS event - a combined event from CBS with actors and staff from Y&R, B&B, and BTG. 
Same night as Paley Center event in NYC.  (Cady and Jon had already been hired long before).
It's all starting on page 343 of the BTG behind-the-scenes thread.

Edit to add:
Well okay I don't know the exact dates Cady and Jon were hired.  They were announced around a week before the first BTG airdate, but no idea of their hire dates.    Don't know if they were hired at the same time or not.  Just that they were announced at the same time.

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Paul is not alone in bringing it up. I do, too. Lin Bolen had such a thing over it. Her authentic claim to fame was the network expansion from half hour to hour but How to Survive a Marriage was her baby, too. And then Faye Dunaway playing her in NETWORK just ices the cake. 

Yes, that's pretty far along since the first Table Read was 10-31-24 aka the day Sam McCall died on GH. So, the photo does not add to the lore. I took a shot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Speculation about Missy Reeves' potential evolution on basic civil rights doesn’t change my opinion of her. My view is shaped entirely by her public social media presence—which I find unpalatable—and I have no interest in learning more beyond that. I simply liked Jennifer’s hair and dress. That’s as far as my admiration goes.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy