Jump to content

BTG: March 2025 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Still working my way through Thurs March 6.  Oh wow.
That line from Smitty: 
"it doesn't mean that my needs and dreams are gonna be ignored by default. And I am not gonna put my life on hold - just to avoid upsetting you!"

I did that in my own life, gave up my needs and dreams just to avoid upsetting my "partner" at the time.   And giving that up - it gave me lasting scars.  It was many years before I finally left that person.

This is the catharsis of good drama.  I reexperience my own life trauma by watching it fictionally, and it gives me a way to process it.  I thought I was past it, but there are still layers of those scars within me, that I see I still need to process.

A good soap will entertain, but also inspire a viewer to examine their own life choices, and perhaps make needed changes.   I hope this storyline helps viewers to leave toxic relationships before there are longterm scars.

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members
Posted (edited)

O course, agree about Dani & Andre. Hilarious t hat daily she says, "No more. Never again" and then they have sex & spend the night & she throws him out again in the morning.

You were talking about Ashley & Derek. My mistake. I thought you were speaking of Bill & Hayley. Seems like  I'm the only one remarking on those two.

 

Is she the perpetual low bar comparison point?

BTW, I dispute the idea that lesbians are always safer to tell story about. GL Otalia being a prime example. They were far more threatening than teen or YA guys.

 

Edited by Contessa Donatella
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you for sharing your story.

Please register in order to view this content

I am sending you a big virtual hug. Moments like these make me feel so happy and so thankful we have BTG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Well the story with Forbes March. He has said that Mason could not be physical with Noah, only shoulder taps.

Also killing Reid like that and never showing a Nuke love scene

ATWT did seem committed to Luke given he had multiple love interests crushes (Kevin, Noah, Brian, Reid) but Noah's other possibilities  (Zach, Mason) were treated like dayplayers

Edited by John
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Ah so Bill and Hayley's home set is *supposed* to look unimpressive:

Thurs. March 6: Dani enters Bill & Hayley's new home and glances around at the living room decor, and then 
Dani snarks to Hayley:
"This is nice! Bill hired Glorietta Interiors, am I right?"
Hayley to Dani: "I'm sure you didn't come here to judge my living room."

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Dani to Hayley: "The fairy tell never tells you how Prince Charming can become a real son-of-a-b!tch, once that ring goes on your finger."

(this is also relevant to Martin/Smitty, obviously)

Bill is upstairs during this whole convo.  After Dani leaves. Bill enters the living room and asks Hayley if he just heard Dani's voice.  Hayley says yes.  Bill says "I need you to hear me well.  You cannot trust Dani". 

This makes me wonder/speculate -- what if Bill was listening from upstairs, and is trying to gaslight Hayley to disregard Dani's warning?

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Speculation about Missy Reeves' potential evolution on basic civil rights doesn’t change my opinion of her. My view is shaped entirely by her public social media presence—which I find unpalatable—and I have no interest in learning more beyond that. I simply liked Jennifer’s hair and dress. That’s as far as my admiration goes.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy