Jump to content

GH: March 2025 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 861
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members
Posted (edited)

He was. They like to pretend it didn't happen because they desperately felt Carly needed a man and this vaguely amiable dayplayer was available. Patrick Mulcahey had him enmeshed with Valentin as the central heads of Pikeman, but once he was on his way out/gone (and they gave up on Jason/Carly 3.0) they began pushing hard to divest Brennan from Pikeman through magical thinking.

Now that Chris is here and likely short-term from the start, I expect they will magically remember Brennan is bad shortly just as they magically remembered that Austin was murdered or that Nikolas let a Black guy take the fall for his crimes, years later.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Don't get me started on that. I will never forgive Ron Carlivati for what he did to Marty Saybrooke on OLTL. Although, she wasn't killed, that was a terrible way to treat that character. 

On that note, I was seriously disgusted to see he's a writer on BTG. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To me one of the most notable things about Charles Mesure & Jack Brennan was that the Casting Director, MarkT, mentioned in an interview that he had been watching for FOUR YEARS for the right part for him. That's how important his hiring & his casting & the part of Jack Brennan actually was. And, given how strongly & substantially he developed an immediate fan following, that totally tracks!

I love the bad guy part of him. It's all WSB related & GH (and DAYS, too) has this long history with these 3-initial dark organizations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So is Brennan not European anymore? It's always odd when accents get dropped or added with recasting.

Biggest example, acting like Ridge on B&B doesn't have a European accent, after the recast.

Joan Collins having a British accent taking over his Alexandra Spalding kind of works because she's supposed to be a grande character.

Recasts aside, there is Victor Newman. He clearly has a German accent but we're acting like he was born in America lol. Anyway, back to GH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Pikeman is one of those stories which seemed like it was used to answer all questions on the show while not answering any. They can't make these types of stories work in an era where they have no budget for remotes and action sequences. 

As soon as Sonny was heavily involved in the story, I moved on, because Sonny stories are going to end the same way. The whole poor Sonny med switching stuff just made the handful of characters who were critical of him seem like they were being set up to later repent. 

I don't know why the show oversold Valentin the way they did, as even when this all started (around the late '00s or early '10s), the Cassadines were not a very frightening family. They only ever were when they were barely shown and just used to bring menace for Luke and Laura. I guess you could count Stavros, in his brief stint under RKK. Helena was also very ruthless, but I never found her frightening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I think Guza infused the Cassadines with real menace and atmosphere in the mid-late '90s. But when it got to the point of Helena hanging around on contract for years into '99, 2000, etc. and the townsfolk dunking on her, Stefan and Laura having boring picnics, and then especially in the late 2000s lingering on when Helena got involved with nonsense like Liz supposedly having Nik's baby (Aiden) or the stuff with them being broke, having silly capers with Summer the hooker and Lydia, that demystified them a lot (to say nothing of the Endgame disaster under JFP and McTavish). Still, Helena was always able to be menacing again with the right writing or script.

I would welcome making them scary again and know how I'd do it, but it would start with offing Valentin. A lot of Helena's nonsense in the 2000s would be written off as her deliberately feinting with trifles vs. her actual plans, beyond death.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I did love watching Constance, even though she was given odd choices like slinking into Chloe's boudoir to kill her.

I agree the best way to go would be killing Valentin. The new Cassadine could be the one responsible. He or she would also be a short-term character who might actually off some regular characters and severely, maybe even permanently injure others, causing a lot of fear and unease over the canvas. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I mentioned that last week and I am glad Tate and Sophia just realized that today lol.  I think the show is just tying up some of Ron's loose ends.   You would think Brady, Holly or even Marlena would have perhaps pointed out the age thing to Tate at some point. I am not sure I like this shift in Sophia's characterization though.  MK played Sophia as someone who always defied her mom's rules-she just didn't get caught.  She was openly trying to steal Tate from Holly with no shame, showing up at the Horton cabin in bikinis to seduce him, and blackmailing Holly to work all her shifts at the Bistro.  Once the recast started the show has acted like Sophia's lived in her room, sheltered her entire life lol.
    • I thought Dante was going to put hands on Gio
    • If Jordan never appeared again, I would absolutely not notice or miss her.  So, while Brook Kerr has her flaws, she at least appears to have a pulse and a personality as Portia.
    • That's because India, or the India MKA ended up playing, was created due to the fact that both she and Kristi Farrell were liked by TPTB, but the part they both read for didn't exactly fit either one of them so the show created two brand new characters for both actresses to play (India and Roxie) and opted not to cast the character they were intending to cast (A cousin of Beth's). I think that's why the show seemed to struggle at first with how to write both India and Roxie in their first months on the show because the characters weren't ever intended to exist.  And yes.. Grant A had a great body... but I didn't find him hot when he was playing Phillip.. only when he was playing Alec on AMC which baffles me since it was the same actor in both parts LOL  
    • I shared this on Twitter and good grief the comments. Steffy fans can be such vile real-life human beings over a fictional character lol.  
    • I remember Michael Logan interviewed L.A. actors/production staff about the movie. Susan Seaforth Hayes said she was dying to know Susan Lucci's reaction.
    • Thanks @Franko  @slick jones You may be interested in the Elisabeth Shue mention. I have to laugh that they apparently didn't even know Teri Hatcher was on Capitol. I have scans somewhere of SPW talking with soap actors about Soapdish. Some, like Mary Stuart, were not happy. I never had a lot of interest in the movie myself. 
    • I never had much of a problem with Brandon Claybon's performance as Martin. He has gotten much better though. While I enjoy his confrontational scenes, I must say his lighter, and carefree scenes from Thursday's episode are the ones that stood out most in the last 3 days (to me).   I agree with all of this!
    • I know that Secret Storm had moved back to the 4/3 PM timeslot in the final months on air, so it's possible that they were trying to employ new techniques/elements to lure the teen demographic.   If that episode was around November/December 1973, I do wonder if the owners (AHS) were still trying to shop the show to other networks still.. or if they had accepted that the show was going to officially go off the air in Feb 1974 at the time of this episode airing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy