Jump to content

Can't edit my own posts from yesterday or prior


janea4old

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Again, great great decision! I've noticed people abuse this option many times. They post some absurd or disgusting things, people reply and then they edit it out... and the people responding sound like the absurd ones.

I am ALL for NOT being able to edit after a certain point of time. 

Please register in order to view this content

Edited by Maxim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I sometimes make a minor typo but don't notice until hours later or the next day.  Then I go back and edit my typo, without comment.

When I have additional info that's minor, or I have a minor clarification, which isn't worth making an entirely new post about, then, in such cases, I edit the original by saying "edit to add" or "edit to clarify". 

I don't abuse this. If I said something that I later discover was wrong info, I quote my original and state that I was wrong.

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Soap Hopper Profiles and Cast Lists have changes whenever new information comes to our attention. I regularly edit anywhere from 10 to 100 posts a week. Just last night I had 7 changes to add that I wanted to include.

We've amassed so much biographical info about the stars in the Hoppers Thread  and identified so many forgotten and unknown  actors and actresses.   As we continue, editing is the only way to include the new findings.

Thanks

BTW -- I tagged both moderators last night about this in the Hopper thread.

Edited by slick jones
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Members

 

I have read this this entire multi-topic thread, and have not seen my concern thoroughly and directly addressed. Although it has been mentioned a couple of times.

I just tried to edit a post, about three hours after it was originally posted, and I am unable to edit.   I often go back and edits my posts for many reasons -- grammar, punctuation, clarification, general wording, correcting stupid statements, or whatever,  etc.  What is the rationale for limiting editing from the original poster?   Why would anyone care if the original poster edits her/his own posts?  I seriously can't imagine why this would be a problem for anyone.   

When unlimited editing was available, no one was forced to edit their posts -- it was simply available to those who wanted to edit. So who did it harm?? I'd be interested to know how many members complained about editing.  Can someone explain in detail, why unlimited editing was taken away?

In simpler terms -- If I don't care when you edit your posts, why would anyone care if I edit mine?     

 

Edited by Mona Kane Croft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • Members

A really stupid decision. I posted all episodes of Sunset Beach in the SB-thread. However now some of the links have expired and I need to edit the post to replace them but am unable to. Who is harmed by letting the users edit their own posts?

Edited by Rattlefield
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What is stopping you from posting the links again in a new message? I'm sorry, but the decision was definitely not stupid. There were instances in which people would post things, stir drama up and then edit what they wrote. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Members

Hi Errol, and happy new year! Was there any resolution (no pun intended!) to this? Can we have back at least the ability to edit our own private messages? I have some PM threads that become rather long and sometimes I need to edit some information into the first post so it doesn't get lost in the shuffle. I used to be able to edit even months after the fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I hope this played better than it sounds, because I'm imagining two separate scenes (the attack by Arnie, and later Charles getting shot). In my mind, it should have been a fluid single sequence. I wonder if or how often "bastard" was uttered in this scene. Fare thee well, Christopher Reeve. I've said it before, but pop culture's gain was daytime's definite loss. Imagine seeing HIM day after day, year after year, decade after decade, conceivably until they stopped producing soaps in NYC.   Well, that answers my "bastard" question. Good lord, the roads of Rosehill are packed with high-strung drivers and/or pedestrians. More sequences that I hope played better than they sound.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think Ben had already left while under Marland and only returned briefly to reconcile with Eve. The whole thing confuses me as I thought for a long time that Eve left the show to go be with him and that was when they reconciled, but it seems like he returned, they got back together, then he left and maybe they were still together until she left to join him? I have no idea.  It does seem like the interim writers were using some characters like Justin and Helena who were quickly dumped under Kobe/Long, which is a shame. Helena is one of those characters who likely always had a shelf life but Rose Alaio was such a vibrant screen presence, if Kobe/Long had just been patient, she likely would have fit in well in the Reva era.
    • Also, the lawsuit story was not the right story to bring Naomi and Bill into a court battle since those types of lawsuits are usually resolved via settlements.
    • I know that Sara did eventually become Carrie's therapist, but I was curious if the show had her make comments regarding Carrie's stunts of making it seem as though Justin was cheating on Jackie.  Given that Justin cheated on Sara with both Jackie and Brandy, I wondered if it was wise of her to counsel Carrie given the conflict of interest involved. @DRW50I think once Adam/Sara end up married.. Marland didn't see any reason to explore Sara's personal life after the actor playing Adam was released.  I know that Sara lasts until at least Christmas 1982 on the show.. but I don't think she ended up staying on for very long into 1983. The period between Marland quitting and Pam Long starting was the perfect time to clean house on characters that had outgrown their usefulness  (i.e. Ben, Evie, Sara, Jennifer, Morgan).. and tying up stories started by Marland that were too complex (Mona Enright, Mark/Jennifer/Amanda triangle).
    • Unpopular opinion:  The focus on the soap opera tropes over the mysteries and crimes was partly what did the show in.  Also, featuring characters not involved in the legal, police, and criminal elements also hurt the show and took away what made it unique. Featuring characters like Jody, Raven, Sky, etc hurt the show long term.  The show ABCified starting in 1976/1977 and then went through a youthification period starting in 1981.  
    • I feel like the lawsuit storyline was resolved quickly because the show didn’t want to spring for more sets.
    • It's been a while, but we have seen the foyer to Bill and Hayley's house as well as the exterior entrance to their house. The foyer was first seen in the premiere episode when Hayley met Vanessa at the house.
    • There's still a year or two before Larkin arrives. Joel is there already. EON does noticeably youthify, although I think they carry it off. Admittedly I haven't seen most of the Jody stories, which from what people here have said aren't great.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy