Jump to content

ALL: End of an Era: Are Daytime Soaps Washing Away?


asafi

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 39
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Say what you will about Maura West, but I've always appreciated the fact that she never phones in her performances.  Same goes for her current GH castmates, Jane Elliot, Cynthia Watros and Laura Wright.  Even when the writing for that foursome is [!@#$%^&*], they show up to work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

With some exceptions, "West Coast hires" can give you the extreme closeups, while "East Coast hires" can give you the pure, theatrical energy.  It's not a knock on either group, however.  It's just two different approaches toward the material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Trust and believe, if daytime dramas were still effective in selling shampoo and dishwashing detergent, then nobody would care about the acting or story quality but us.  As evidenced by so much of the melodramatic acting and poor quality scripts from 1960s soaps.

But, when consumer product divisions started to scrimp on safety testing, and were deemed no longer as trustworthy, they lost profitability and found that the old ways of marketing were no longer a useful investment.  For example, the toxic shock lawsuits of the early 1980s were completely avoidable if P&G hadn't put sales before safety.  But once they lost 900 lawsuits and $58.2 million dollars, they could no longer afford to produce soap operas.   They also lost $24.2 million due to misleading the public on decongestants, and $45.6 million on deceptive marketing of probiotics.

https://www.chicagotribune.com/1989/03/27/after-8-years-procter-still-not-free-of-the-rely-controversy/

Just think about the timing of these losses, and the resulting changes in the daytime landscape.  Because OJ and shock talkshows wouldn't have been allowed to flourish if ATWT was still pushing Prell.   Take a moment to watch the commercials on daytime now.  Nobody wants to invest in a medium that markets to people interested in mesothelioma lawsuits and dental assistant training programs. 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • Members

Well, I guess this is sort of an appropriate thread - but there's a trend with Netflix trying to do their shows / movies more "background" friendly:

 

Of course, this is historically how soaps often functioned - background noise for hausfraus while going on about their business and sitting down to watch the good parts. I think this is another sign why Days keeps getting renewed, Amazon picked up Neighbours and CBS pushed through with Beyond the Gates. People want some sort of format they can dive in and out of. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • First, Martin vs Ted. Now Kat vs Ted.    
    • Team Silk Press Sheila!  I hope she topples the mighty Duprees because that family has it coming. The spoilers that were posted last week for today's episode had Ashley/Derek mentioned, but as we saw, they weren't featured at all.  Was that part of the spoiler a mistake, or did the show edit them out.    Nice to see a bit of Vanessa/Doug.. and I'm fascinated by Vanessa's perspective in regards to Dani/Bill's marriage vs Nicole/Ted's marriage. While this was a good episode, it does highlight that the show is lacking non-Dupree related characters.  
    • Cry me a river! lol. Oh, Silk-Press.     Awwww no good night for Dani and Andre.    Uh oh. They are at the house. It's dark and Mona did let everyone off for the night...    
    • I just hate this dress. Bottom picture. 
    • I do wonder if Bill will suffer any consequences from his part in all of this.   Ambyr is such a star. I love it when actors react in the background.    Kat, this ain't about you!   Go 'head, Martin vs Ted.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • "On a shallow note" Martin gets all the booty from his Daddy, Ted is just as stacked as his son, LOL! I had to say it.
    • Lol! If Kat is going to do one thing, it's going to be give shade.   And of course, the Duprees would get into formation and team up. Sadly, I don't think they have anything on Silk Press Sheila.    Poor Nicole.   But loving it. I know I'm invested besides I'm seriously side-eying Vanessa/Doug cuz I want to get to the meat. And I love that every single beat is getting played.    Oooo Nosy Nurse!!!   OOOOHHHH so Silk Press Sheila and Nicole were preggers at the same time. And HA!!! The lawyer WAS Bill!  The acting is superb. Silk Press Sheila even toyed with Martin a little bit.   Ooooomg! Eva revealed.   Wait! Is it food posioning for Vanessa or is she with child?
    • Well, if you add that one caveat, oddly, it disqualifies Renee. Because she is one person who was both the planner (if you will) and also the "evil" revealer. Weird but that is THE difference.  And it's the only difference. But, sure, I think those words make it unique. THE REVEALER CONVINCES HER TARGET TO HOST THE EVENT. Right?  Well, if we nitpick The Revealer used her secret agent to convince their target to do this shindig. Yes. That's it. Because Leslie/Sheila/Sherry/Dana/Leslie/Mom didn't do it by herself. She HAD to have Eva doing her part.  Okay, run with that.  And, why not discuss it here? It's topical.     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy