Jump to content

B&B/Y&R: March 2024 Spoilers


Message added by Errol,

Effective April 2024, B&B Spoilers and Y&R Spoilers will become separate threads within the Discuss Previews and Spoilers forum as some posters are interested in reading spoilers for one show but not the other.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 200
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

That is what I want to know, LOL.  Danny keeps telling Phyllis to stay away, but then agrees to have dinner with her or whatever.  It's stupid.
FYI, on Monday March 4 US (Friday March 1st Canada) Phyllis has a fantasy about how her dinner with Danny will go

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

B&B Preview images from the youtubetv episode guide
(these will become the episode thumbnails for CBS)
https://tv.youtube.com/browse/the-bold-and-the-beautiful-UCiaukWSbRCUga4KUd9vKVtw 



Preview of thumbnail pic for Season 37, Episode 113
(Monday March 4)

Please register in order to view this content

 



Preview of thumbnail pic for Season 37, Episode 114
(Tuesday March 5)

 
 

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I know Right Janea4old I am not sure Danny cuts Phyllis out of his life the Spolier just said he sets the record straight with Phyllis .so I am not sure what that means . I do know the trio tapped quite a bit in Feb to air this month .and I don't understand why if the triangle is truly over .

From what I was told by a Twitter insider and Canada insider Even though Danny chose the Bug and is with her for a bit something happens at some point (rumor has it they get stranded someplace )some how  Phyllis and Danny end up having a ONS and she will actually blackmail him with that so he leaves Christine to be with her.  I wouldnt be surprised if she gets it on video he obviously won't want the bug to know about it so Phyllis will use that that to her advantage basically as leverage , basically either He leaves the bug and be with her or She blows the whistle. And reveals her evidence 

 This is pretty much what happened all those years ago? Only now some form evidence instead of a baby?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Did you see what admin @Errol posted this morning about reputable sources for spoilers at this link?
https://boards.soapoperanetwork.com/topic/66290-monthly-vs-general-spoilers


Furthermore, the rumors you are hearing sound like things people are guessing from who was filming when.

There was a BTS scene that Michelle Stafford had on her IG about 4-8 weeks ago about a dinner and sharing sauce with Michael Damian. M.S. played it up for fun, but she didn't actually say anything would happen.  I think a lot of rumors came from people making guesses due to her post.

The dinner is scheduled to air Wed. March 6 U.S. 


 


This is what happened all those years ago:
Danny didn't have sex with Phyllis. She had sex with some other guy and got pregnant with Daniel, but did something to the guy so he wouldn't remember.  Then Phyllis did something to make Danny think that Danny slept with Phyllis but he didn't. He was faithful to Christine.  
Then Phyllis said Danny was the father, but he wasn't.
Then Danny married Phyllis out of obligation to baby Daniel, because he thought Daniel was his.  Phyllis tried to woo Danny after they were married, and to get him to like her a little. He tried to be friends for the sake of the baby.  Danny had sex with Phyllis for the first time a while after he was married to her.

More than a year (maybe two or three years?) later on, Danny learned that he wasn't the father (long storyline) and he sued for and won full custody of Daniel, after proving that Phyllis was morally unfit.  Danny later moved to Europe and took Daniel with him and raised him alone.  Phyllis never saw Daniel again - well not until years later when Daniel was a teenager.

Note that I am relaying this off of memory from decades ago, without looking it up, so I probably have some details wrong, but that's the gist of it.

 

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Update:

Lauralee Bell and Michael Damian interviewed by Kristyn Burtt on zoom,
interview posted March 4, 2024.
The video is embedded within this article:
https://soaps.sheknows.com/the-young-and-the-restless/news/720106/lauralee-bell-michael-damian-do-chris-danny-reunite/

But the video is hard to see because it's a connatix.com video that disappears if you have an adblocker.   I had to try several browsers with various settings before I could see it.

The video is 19 minutes long and mostly just chatty stuff.   Lauralee and Michael D. enjoy promoting their recent scenes and talking about the old days.
  
Partway through, Lauralee says a very vague spoiler.  "There's something coming up that's so classic Phyllis. This one will remind you of back in the day.  That's coming up in a few weeks.  It's classic Phyllis."

Lauralee sounded enthused about it, but most of the past few months of Christine/Danny/Phyllis stuff has been a stupid dud (in my opinion), so I'm skeptical that anything upcoming would be worthwhile.

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There is this pic Which has Danny Gripping his hands on Phyllis  i know its to get though to her but if He accidentally leaves bruises she could possibly take pics and use that as leverage against Danny. Which would be classic Phyllis .

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^ picture from SOD
https://www.soapoperadigest.com/photos/first-look-photos-spoiler-pics-of-the-week-ahead-1736841/


Yeah but Abby witnesses that scene and Christine walks into that scene a minute later, so she'll know.

Pictures from here at this site
https://www.soapoperanetwork.com/2024/03/the-young-and-the-restless-prevue-for-the-week-of-march-4-8-2024

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
    • Roger's return storyline may have been silly but Roger's return was what lead to GL's last golden era.  It was the combination of Roger's return and Robert Calhoun becoming EP that got GL to finally hit it's stride after some really bad years. It will always disappoint me that the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run didn't reflect the quality of the show.
    • He also gave some of the best episodes, like the episodes surrounding Doug's death. The problem with Days was that Ron had a horrible vision from he top. I don't feel the same for MVJ and nothing that has happened in all these months suggests she doesn't have a handle on the show. Now if it becomes an issue I'll acknowledge it, but I'm not seeing it so far.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy