Jump to content

B&B January 2023 Discussion Thread


Taoboi

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

<div style="width:480px"><iframe allow="fullscreen" frameBorder="0" height="270" src="https://giphy.com/embed/mSG7epqcwJDFEV9KJc/video" width="480"></iframe></div>

Edited by Soapsuds
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love Kimberlin Brown and her wicked smiles. 

Please register in order to view this content

Well, it was a little cheese here and a little cheese there, but overall, Kimberlin Brown impresses me. 

Edited by Noel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I predict in either July or November of 2023 that Brooke, Ridge, and Taylor are going to have a threesome. Upon discovering that Brooke and Taylor are lovers, this will be a huge blow to Ridge's ego and pride. Then as time surpasses, Ridge, Brook, and Taylor will have the threesome of their lives. But since Brooke and Taylor have been using dildos, they ask Ridge to lay on his back and .....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm pretty bored with the wicked Sheila smiles. The character needs another timeout.

Instead we get dumb Katie telling Bill "You're a hero" just because he turned Sheila in. Huh??? In what universe does that equate hero status?

And so what if Sheila gets out of jail. Does she get anything she wants regarding her son? In the meantime, as on every soap, she gets visitor after visitor in jail -- private meetings, of course.

Deacon? As usual, Brad Bell got bored writing for him, so he's just...gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

*Pet* is a stretch. This is KB's longest B&B run in 25 years. She's only had two other runs 2002-03 and 2017-18. Did either of those even last a year?

It's remarkable Sheila can be integrated so well into the show despite she a long absence since her initial run 1992-98.

ITA - Sheila works well in clearly defined stories. Unfortunately, Bell has a habit of writing Sheila into unnecessary corners. Seriously, the thought of Finn finding out that Sheila spiked Brooke's champagne turns into shooting Steffy (and Finn). C'mon. But it did boost the ratings for several months. So there's that.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    •   @jmgaw did not refer to Luke and Laura. Throughout 78 GH's ratings continued to rise as AW's fell. That turnaround was getting a lot of attention in the soap press with Scotty/Laura, Rick/Leslie/Monica etc . So the 90 min decision was a reaction to that. I guess the thinking was that 60 min expansion had worked so starting AW a half hour before might keep viewers from switching to GH at 3pm. I don't think anybody really thought it would work. The most sensible solution would have been to expand The Doctors and hope for a GH like turnaround, but for reasons unknown TD never went to an hour.    
    • Like I said competing organization But this is not what I want to happen.
    • Hotel no doubt benefited from the Dynasty lead in and didn't move until it was jettisoned to Sat night wasteland to play out a final season. Maybe it should have been moved earlier to perhaps bolster another night and allow ABC to nurture another show in the post Dynasty timeslot when the former was still a ratings winner.  
    • Who is going to say, "I'm headed home to watch The Chew?!?!" One of the most ridiculous names ever. I didn't watch AMC or keep up with it towards the end, but OLTL still had life in it and could have gone on. OLTL 2.0 was entertaining and worked because RC was not involved. A real shame that did not work because I think the show could have gone in good directions. 
    • Another episode with Chandler uploaded.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I've always said that JFP's main problem is that she comes up with some shocking event and she plans around the event but she never thinks much about the emotional fallout for the characters or the fans. That's why so many of her stories don't work and damage her shows. I like your idea about Lando playing the person involved in hitting Maureen. It would have given Peter Simon something to do which is the feeble excuse they gave for killing Maureen off in the first place. Instead, they gave us the dreck they did.  And they were so obsessed with recreating the blackout week that they kept putting characters in fires and blizzards. None of which I saw, but going through the Logan columns I noticed: every few weeks, someone at GL would give an interview to Logan saying GL was going to get better because they had a great new storyline (A fire! A blizzard! A fire!) . Insanity.  
    • @Contessa Donatella, Make sure to cite your sources when making claims such as "apparently she just inked a new deal." This information has not been reported anywhere and is therefore not known to the public, unless disclosed by the actor in question themselves. Once again, stop stating information as fact without providing a legitimate source. What you read or hear somewhere, from either message boards or on social media, does not make it true. This includes information from your "sources."
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Sorry.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ieDNct2sgXU  
    • I don't believe it either, @kalbir.  Ironically, I think KL's first producer, Joseph B. Wallenstein, ended up producing "Hotel" as well.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy