Jump to content

The Media/Journalism Thread


Faulkner

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Amy Walter/Cook have been going into overdrive lately about how Harris still isn't beating the polling spread enough, that Trump did not blame Democrats when he was "shot" but now he is so numbers will favor him, etc. I do agree that polling is probably too rosy for Harris but still the propaganda is not subtle.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Why has all the polling been wrong since Dobbs? Not in favor of democrats by the way yet dems have way outperformed.  Are we suggesting that the polling industry is still that broken that none of these polling organizations have fixed their polling to reflect "enthusiasm" or whatever you want to call it to account for the errors in 2016 and 2020? We all believe the polling was correct when Biden was in the race and it was tight with a slight advantage for Trump but it's impossible for the current numbers to be accurate when a democrat is ahead.   I don't believe any of it for one reason DOBBS.  

By the way I am not suggesting ignoring the polls and to not be skeptical. I am probably the biggest skeptic.  I am not paying attention to any of them. But I am looking at what Tom Bonier's stats show and whatever model Chris Bouzy has been using(he won't disclose all of his measurements) who has been saying for months Florida is in play and IOWA of all places will be in play. He's been saying this for months not just now and boom.  I'm a skeptic but might turn into a true believer if his projections are correct.

The answer is work.  Ignore the polls and everyone do what they can. I'm still recovering from some health issues but I intend to goto Iowa to help do canvassing and do phone banking for swing states for NARAL again. Postcards are easy to do. And anyone here who wants information on how to help, is welcome to message me, but there is a load of information available on ways to help online.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Seeing the race barreling in a direction they don't like, Axios is pissed (and ratio'ed).

 

The co-author is of course Alex Thompson, who has been hardcore chumming for drama/oppo on Harris since Biden dropped out (who he relentlessly pursued, particularly after losing a book deal). He hasn't tweeted anything positive for Biden/Harris in... I don't know how long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Of course it'd be fewer, she wasn't the presumptive nominee until a few months ago. Smh. The media expects her and Walz to play catch up with the interviews tally compared to Trump/Biden who have been running for president for well over a year. Thankfully Harris/Walz aren't taking the bait. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think they're angrier that she isn't courting them vs. local media and more diverse journalists (who they consider lesser).

The 'define her' game has largely ended, according to the new polling - Harris' favorables among voters are all up. They've gotten to know her and like her. I do think Harris should do more interviews both as candidate and potential POTUS, but for now the campaign knows Axios, etc. mostly want to play gotcha games and drive narrative with responding to Trump and she's not giving them that oxygen. She's doing media and interviews her way.

Harris has an interview with Oprah today, I believe.

Meanwhile: The ever-angrier Jonathan Martin continues to play "Here's How Bernie Trump Can Still Win", inexplicably citing states that Trump lost 2 out of 3 last time as an 'electoral firewall':

 

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This attempt to ignore it won't matter, btw. Nuzzi has enough friends in the Beltway club who are all struggling to report on this right now, but I am willing to bet a lot of other dirt on her has gone underreported til now and will begin coming out more and more (in addition to her existing bad priors).

They will attempt to rehab Nuzzi - she will likely crop up as a panelist on CNN or MSNBC or something in the next 6-18 months, she will maybe get a confessional piece in the Atlantic or somewhere. People will signal boost it. But she can't hide what she is anymore or what she's always been. Nuzzi's final destination has always been the right wing fever swamp, just like people like Bari Weiss, Taibbi, etc. I knew she would end up there eventually and she's been trending there for some time, going more and more mask off even in polite Beltway circles. So any rehab won't last. She will be on Newsmax in 5 years, maybe ahead of schedule from what I'd always expected. Lara Loganville.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • It sure was!  With respect, how does that make sense?  These men are young, I don't see that. 
    • I hope this played better than it sounds, because I'm imagining two separate scenes (the attack by Arnie, and later Charles getting shot). In my mind, it should have been a fluid single sequence. I wonder if or how often "bastard" was uttered in this scene. Fare thee well, Christopher Reeve. I've said it before, but pop culture's gain was daytime's definite loss. Imagine seeing HIM day after day, year after year, decade after decade, conceivably until they stopped producing soaps in NYC.   Well, that answers my "bastard" question. Good lord, the roads of Rosehill are packed with high-strung drivers and/or pedestrians. More sequences that I hope played better than they sound.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think Ben had already left while under Marland and only returned briefly to reconcile with Eve. The whole thing confuses me as I thought for a long time that Eve left the show to go be with him and that was when they reconciled, but it seems like he returned, they got back together, then he left and maybe they were still together until she left to join him? I have no idea.  It does seem like the interim writers were using some characters like Justin and Helena who were quickly dumped under Kobe/Long, which is a shame. Helena is one of those characters who likely always had a shelf life but Rose Alaio was such a vibrant screen presence, if Kobe/Long had just been patient, she likely would have fit in well in the Reva era.
    • Also, the lawsuit story was not the right story to bring Naomi and Bill into a court battle since those types of lawsuits are usually resolved via settlements.
    • I know that Sara did eventually become Carrie's therapist, but I was curious if the show had her make comments regarding Carrie's stunts of making it seem as though Justin was cheating on Jackie.  Given that Justin cheated on Sara with both Jackie and Brandy, I wondered if it was wise of her to counsel Carrie given the conflict of interest involved. @DRW50I think once Adam/Sara end up married.. Marland didn't see any reason to explore Sara's personal life after the actor playing Adam was released.  I know that Sara lasts until at least Christmas 1982 on the show.. but I don't think she ended up staying on for very long into 1983. The period between Marland quitting and Pam Long starting was the perfect time to clean house on characters that had outgrown their usefulness  (i.e. Ben, Evie, Sara, Jennifer, Morgan).. and tying up stories started by Marland that were too complex (Mona Enright, Mark/Jennifer/Amanda triangle).
    • Unpopular opinion:  The focus on the soap opera tropes over the mysteries and crimes was partly what did the show in.  Also, featuring characters not involved in the legal, police, and criminal elements also hurt the show and took away what made it unique. Featuring characters like Jody, Raven, Sky, etc hurt the show long term.  The show ABCified starting in 1976/1977 and then went through a youthification period starting in 1981.  
    • I feel like the lawsuit storyline was resolved quickly because the show didn’t want to spring for more sets.
    • It's been a while, but we have seen the foyer to Bill and Hayley's house as well as the exterior entrance to their house. The foyer was first seen in the premiere episode when Hayley met Vanessa at the house.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy