Jump to content

The Media/Journalism Thread


Faulkner

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

oh wow.  LOL Well he did a snap poll to see what people thought about reinstating Tr*mp.  Very unscientific. They said yes so he did.

Yesterday he did a snap poll (again unscientific) about restoring the twitter accounts of the journalists that he had just suspended. That result was clear so he reinstated some but not all of them.

I guess this is how he decides things? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wish Jack Dorsey cared enough to fix this, but I don't know .....  He wrote a long essay last week about how nobody should suspend accounts or control twitter, that AI algorithms should be able to manage things.

https://www.getrevue.co/profile/jackjack/issues/a-native-internet-protocol-for-social-media-1503112
I read a little bit of it but then ... I had to stop.  I mean ... Jack doesn't seem to allow for the fact that sociopaths unfortunately exist.

 

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Earlier today, Twitter Support tweeted out this twitter thread:
(It's since been deleted from twitter, but here is what is said):
 

We recognize that many of our users are active on other social media platforms. However, we will no longer allow free promotion of certain social media platforms on Twitter.
— Twitter Support (@TwitterSupport) December 18, 2022
https://twitter.com/TwitterSupport/status/1604531261791522817


Specifically, we will remove accounts created solely for the purpose of promoting other social platforms and content that contains links or usernames for the following platforms: Facebook, Instagram, Mastodon, Truth Social, Tribel, Nostr and Post.
— Twitter Support (@TwitterSupport) December 18, 2022
https://twitter.com/TwitterSupport/status/1604531265419591681


We still allow cross-posting content from any social media platform. Posting links or usernames to social media platforms not listed above are also not in violation of this policy.
— Twitter Support (@TwitterSupport) December 18, 2022
https://twitter.com/TwitterSupport/status/1604531268493795329


More information on this policy, as well as how we will take action on violations, can be found here: 
https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/social-platforms-policy
— Twitter Support (@TwitterSupport) December 18, 2022
https://twitter.com/TwitterSupport/status/1604531272226832387


If you click on the link they gave for rules and policies, it showed this (This is a screencap of what it showed):

Please register in order to view this content

_______________________________________________________________


After that, twitter founder Jack Dorsey (@jack) tweeted a simple "Why?" in reply to that Twitter Support thread.
At this link:
https://twitter.com/jack/status/1604554032831287298

At last check, jack's "Why?" tweet is still up ... but who knows what may happen, LOL.

I was thinking that he was speaking for *all* the people who would want the right to tweet about any other platforms.  But now that I look at this, I think that perhaps Jack was complaining specifically because Nostr is one of the things forbidden to discuss.  Jack is into Nostr.
https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2022/12/15/jack-dorsey-gives-decentralized-social-network-nostr-14-btc-in-funding/
__________________________________

 

In the meantime, Twitter Support has taken down all four of those tweets, and they have made that policy page blank.

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's no longer newsworthy that M*sk is saying stupid outrageous things. I mean I'm not bothering to post about it because he'll just say another stupid outrageous thing the next day.

However, the *actions* he takes do affect people in the real world who were relying on twitter to discuss important human rights issues.  Thankfully people are finding other platforms to move to, but still.

_______

Meanwhile...
Interesting article about how Mastodon has grown by 800%.  And other companies being supportive.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/dec/21/firefox-and-tumblr-join-rush-to-support-mastodon-social-network

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Gone already. Increasingly the young staff of these predominantly online outlets think they can get cute and everyone will appreciate their being edgy for the sake of 'jokes'. The whole 'nepo baby' flap was equally embarrassing while poorly attempting to feint to class critique, which is the basis for so many weak takes these days. Unlike EW, NY Mag/Vulture does some good work but has also tried to put dumb stuff over more than once. Too many writers are stuck believing they're forever 21. It's a systemic thing that permeates the media culture now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

C-SPAN likes to go in and show close-ups (without audio) of various congresspersons chatting between votes.  But that's not allowed when Congress is formally in session.

This isn't the case during Speaker elections.

C-SPAN has been showing all sorts of (no audio) conversations in the past two days.  Fascinating.

People have been tweeting out the closeups of the congresspersons and others have been tweeting out replies with humorous guesses as to what they are saying.
 

Edited by janea4old
Edited to correct some info.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
    • shoot...he said in that Locher room with Krista. I think he met her before that---she was doing Broadway and they had mutual friends or an agent maybe?
    • Yes. And I assume he met Mary Ellen Stuart at GL.
    • That's an odd coincidence. Yeah, Roger would turn anything he could to his advantage. At the time, he's just taking the pictures to bank leverage over Reva, Billy or the Lewises.  I'm kinda squeamish about 1986 episodes myself. I'd love to hear the original version of Ross/Vanessa/Dinah, but the Cain story is bad, and I don't want Billy and Vanessa to break up.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy