Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 years later...
  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

It's funny how the basic premise of this show mirrors the suggested spin-off for Peyton Place at the time - break out character Betty left for New York after her failed marriage to Rodney and that was supposed to be the show. Of course, it ended up playing out on screen on Peyton Place and Betty returning to the small city, but it makes you wonder if the writers for Our Private World heard about it and decided to take it for themselves. Then again, it's not exactly the most original concept lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The show (Peyton Place) had originally been envisioned as an anthology series about the various citizens of the town.   Irna Phillips thought that it should have been a serial and persuaded Paul Monash as much.  Robert J. Shaw, the co-writer of Our Private World, was a frequent writer of Peyton Place episodes (particularly during the first season).

Edited by danfling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

according to his emmy legends interview, when douglas cramer (who had been a supervising producer@atwt) came to new program development @ abc, he approached irna phillips about creating a nightly drama series. pgp said no and cramer turned to ‘peyton place.,’ hoping irna would write the serial. but abc wanted monash, who had written a well-received episode of ‘the untouchables.’

monash hated the idea of pp as a soap; it was he who called it ‘a high class anthology drama.’ since monash had no idea how to serialize a story, cramer brought irna on as a consultant. reportedly, the relationship between irna and monash was, shall we say, less than collegial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...
  • Members

The spin-off show from Peyton Place is mentioned above.    It was, as my memory recalls, to be called The Girl from Peyton Place and was to star Barbara Parkins as Betty Anderson Harrington Cord.    

I tend to think that the spin-off show came during the latter part of the run of Peyton Place, and that Our Private World had probably already been cancelled.    I could be wrong, but this is what I tend to beleive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Danfling. The Girl from Peyton Place came about early in the show's run and episodes were shown on PP when Betty went to New York.

The spin off was set but then for whatever reason the decision was made to expand PP to 3 nights a week rather than use the 3rd night for the new show.

Have a read through the Peyton Place thread for more detail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
  • Members

The TV Guide review June 26 1965

CBS, which was no network to take ABC’s Peyton Place lying down,has come up with a new twice-weekly nighttime, or rather, nightmare, version of its 10-year-old daytime serial As the World Turns. Some time ago, in a burst of enthusiasm, CBS publicity proudly noted that the amount of time As the World Turns had been on the air was equal to 500 motion pictures the length of “Cleopatra.” And, if that statistic wasn’t enough— and it wasn’t—they added that the scripts used by the program since its debut could reach a height of more than 411 feet.

They did not, however, mention their depth, and in this respect, at least, we think they were wise. However much depth As the World Turns may have had in the daytime, Our Private World at night has—you can bet on this—less. In fact, if it weren’t for repeating everything twice, we don’t think they’d be on twice a week. We recall one conversation which went as follows: “All the man said was, ‘Can I help?’ And do you know “what I wanted to do? I wanted to murder him. Because he couldn’t help. Does that make sense? ‘Can I help you?’ That’s all he said. And I hate him.”

Created—you will pardon the expression—by Irna Phillips and William Bell, Our Private World is based on the efforts of a young divorcee, Lisa Hughes (Eileen Fulton), to turn over a new leaf in Chicago. For this task she meets a girl named, aptly enough, Eve (Julienne Marie). The latter, meeting Lisa on her first day in her job in the admitting office of a Chicago hospital, says, “My friends call me Eve. I have hundreds of friends, you know. Will you call me Eve, friend?” Then, when Lisa asks, “Next of kin?” Eve sobs, “Nobody—nobody in this big, wide, wonderful, stinking world.” In the next script they have quite a talk about the word “admitting,” too, but we'll spare you that.

Anyway, you get the idea. Both Lisa and Eve have problems, the chief of which seems to be Eve’s family. Eve has two mother-dominated brothers and a mother herself, and if this show may be said to have a specialty, it is in its “Is there anything else, Mother?” scenes. The Eldredges, incidentally, are very rich. They pronounce everything very strangely, as if they were just about to sneeze— Mrs. Eldredge (Geraldine Fitzgerald), for example, pronounces “were,” “whirr”; and “words,” “weirds.” And honestly, when one of her sons says, “We're not as weird as we seem,” both words and weirds fail. Altogether it is the first show we’ve seen in a long time where literally nothing is good—the idea, the producing, the writing or the directing. As for the acting, it has to be seen to be believed —and, believe us, it shouldn’t be. The girls are bad and the boys are worse. One thing this show does, though. It makes Peyton Place look great. In fact, the only thing we cannot fault is the title, Our Private World. The mistake was in making it public.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@DRW50 Cleveland Armory the TV Guide critic was quite acerbic, but yes, the general consensus was that OPW wasn't suitable for primetime. 

They didn't seem to make any allowances for nightime in terms of budget, pace, production etc.

Really would like to know what the thinking was. Maybe just to see if a cheap to produce daytime soap could work at night?

I believe initially there was talk of Edge of Night making the move to primetime in some form.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Years later Nicolas Coster said in an interview how much more advanced "Peyton Place" was from a technical standpoint since it was shot on film and could get better angles as opposed to the much heavier TV cameras used for "Our Private World".  Also, the ABC series could use exteriors on the Fox lot as opposed to the CBS studio in mid-Manhattan.  

I think the odds are good that P&G held on to the videotapes and/or kinescopes since it was a primetime production.  I would love to see the entire series because of its unique place in soap history, and because how three decades later Doug Marland revisited Lisa's time with the Eldredge clan on ATWT with a delicious plot twist that shocked everyone in Oakdale!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Well, they usually weren't on the show at the time for long until the late 90's. But yeah, they really deserved a story centered on them, and not through the lens of Reva.
    • Chelsea was doing the absolute most today! Why was she introducing her sister to a woman she doesnt know? That whole scene was embarrassing. Madison needs to stay away from her bc she is too immature
    • Gosh, what a waste with Lunacy. Why have her live with $B, reveal Finn, pardon her, etc What makes this story incredibly hollow is that what Luna is asking isn't unreasonable - to spend time with her cousin father. She's not asking to move in with them. How hard with it be for Finn to throw her a bone by, say, I'll meet you for lunch/coffee once at week at the hospital cafeteria. Lunacy isn't going to hurt Finn. In fact, all her crimes were related to finding her father and it turns out to be someone she's loved her entire life. Instead of course-correcting the nonsense of last summer, Brad somehow found a way to make this worse! That's a skill... Of all the younger actors B&B has cast during the past 5 years, LY has shown the most growth and range. Why get rid of her? 
    • On the subject of sets (seems more interesting to discuss than the actual show)  Some sets we don't see anymore Lauren/Michael apartment (haven't seen that in years) Victoria's house (are Marian/Tessa living there?) Apartment above Crimson Lights (I think Chelsea was the last resident) Penthouse (Lily's home) Chancellor Estate (Devon/Abby) Chancellor office (once Dark Horse) Nick's house GCAC room (used as residence/hotel room for several characters) Some of these may pop up again. The tack house,for example, was not seen for many months before being used again. Have I missed anything?
    • Thanks for searching through everything. Worked on them so long, just too lazy to check for those links myself, so I am glad you chose to do it! I guess I never did type out anything for 1973-1977 in regards to the preemptions, but they are on the charts at least (and this far back, they don't seem to do any of those "breakouts" anymore, so things are simpler in the 1970's, so eventually I could type those out). 
    • I dump on the Y&R sets problem all the time, but BOLD is no better -- and they're not even introducing new sets. All of their sets are years old, and very few look like they're inhabited by people with money. Is that going to change with this move? I'd rather they save the money spent on another remote, which is no better than an HGTV travelogue, and get some new/better sets.
    • The donut posts here make up for a Friday show that was barely meh. Aside from seeing Anna, I really didn't care much about anything else. While I understand the thought behind breaking up all the sadness with "other scenes," I'd rather they moved right to John's funeral. Instead of hearing a stupid story about John changing some minor character's tire 20 years ago, just move on to the crying. I also thought the Chad and Cat scenes were a waste. I realize not everyone is devastated by John's death to the point of not functioning, but going sky diving is a choice. By the way, Jack and Jennifer are giving me nothing on this return. Please leave asap. DAYS did such a great job with John's death, so ending the week this way was a letdown.
    • Add Dr. Montgomery to list of fine women on this show! I hope the show goes forward with Madison/Chelsea and then once they're developed, bring back Allison, who is now divorced or a widow, for a Madison/Chelsea/Allison triangle.  It would definitely be the hottest triangle in daytime.  
    • I wonder if Linda Bloodworth-Thomason had Kim in mind for any of her other characters/series. If they intended Allison Sugarbaker (Julia Duffy's character) to be more in line with who Suzanne was/Delta Burke's portrayal-persona, then I think Kim would have aced that. Yes, it would have been odd, Kim having previously played a different character (from a different family), but Designing Women wouldn't have been the first show with that issue. Or maybe Kim could have played Beth Broderick's role on Hearts Afire. Or Patricia Heaton's role on Women of the House.
    • Sony is probably waiting until Y&R’s lease is up as well. All of TV City is going to be gutted, so they have to relocate at some point. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy