Jump to content
Email System Update

Daytime's Master Headwriters: Their Strongest and Weakest Work

vetsoapfan

Recommended Posts

  • Members
vetsoapfan Mentor

vetsoapfan

Posted
  • Author
  • Members
Posted

In interviews, he praised Pat Falken Smith's contribution to the show, but to my knowledge, he never referred to any other writer's contribution to DAYS.

 

After being largely responsible for the show's popularity in the 1960s and '70s, I also wonder if he felt frustration or disappointment at how subsequent writers gutted his once-sophisticated, adult show. Similarly, how did Agnes Nixon and Harding Lemay feel about AW's destruction by hack writers after they had both worked so hard to turn AW into a daytime legend?

 

By the way, I forgot to add in my previous comment, that after she was fired in early 1977, Pat Falken Smith sued DAYS OF OUR LIVES because the show continued to use story outlines which she, herself, had written. This also confirms that William J. Bell was not solely responsible for the show's yearly bible, although how much he contributed to the overall plot projections and how much Smith contributed, I suppose we will never know now, four decades later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 165
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
titan1978 Veteran

titan1978

Posted
  • Members
Posted

When I think of plot driven soap writers I think of Thom Racina.  He is better at it than Pratt because he plays the beats and knows how to use suspense, not just shock.

 

He is the perfect Monty era example of an action oriented/super couple formula driven writer.  I enjoyed his work, but again, it's not sophisticated material.  Which was fine when you could watch GH for a breezy adventure, Days for serious romance, Y&R for complicated characters and psychological insight, AMC for class distinction and a touch of humor, etc.  now that they are all plot plot plot it makes enjoying any of the soaps more tedious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Members
zanereed Explorer

zanereed

Posted
  • Members
Posted

Agreed. I wish that Smith had a longer stint on "Guiding Light" than just a few months.

Speaking of GL, I think the Dobsons' best work was their time on GL. I don't think that anything they did afterwards came close to how great their era of the show was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Members
vetsoapfan Mentor

vetsoapfan

Posted
  • Author
  • Members
Posted

 

Yes, Smith jumped right into THE GUIDING LIGHT with great scripts, character delineation, and a focus on family, history, and community. She was wonderful. Unfortunately, after she left, the quality of the writing for that series sank noticeably. For many years in the 1980s, TGL was dreadfully written.

 

The Dobsons' work on TGL showed how talented they really were, and I agree that nothing they did later matched the quality of their work on TGL.

Yes, Marland recommended Smith to follow him at TGL, just as she had done so successfully at GH. Lord only knows why her stint at R'sH was so mediocre. Bland production values and several uninteresting characters at the forefront did not do her any favors. She really had an uphill battle there, and just did not make it.

I think by that point, P&G wanted to overhaul and dumb down TGL, to appeal to the ABC audience. Smith's adult, sophisticated, character-driven work flew in the face of that. Yes, Smith was very good with Amanda. And Vanessa. And the Bauers. And Nola. And history. Watching the show sink into mediocrity after she left was painful. I had had a long history with TGL, and it was the very first time in decades that the show became truly awful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Members
Soapsuds Grand Master

Soapsuds

Posted
  • Members
Posted

This is a great post DRW. TGL did change during the 80's….I noticed the difference as well but couldn't really explain it but you did. Once TGL was dumb down …the ratings dropped and ATWT was always for the most part ahead in the ratings. At that time I felt ATWT was more adult and sophisticated….character driven….what TGL once was during its glory years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Members
vetsoapfan Mentor

vetsoapfan

Posted
  • Author
  • Members
Posted

Soapsuds, I think TPTB experimented with dumbing down ATWT, too, in the early 1980s. What else could explain the elimination of so many vets, and the moronic stories like Mr. Big? Fortunately, producer Robert Calhoun the late, great Douglas Marland stepped in to save the day, and reestablished the show's integrity fairly quickly. TGL was not so lucky. It, like GH, spent most of the 1980s in a state of poorly-written flux.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Members
Soapsuds Grand Master

Soapsuds

Posted
  • Members
Posted

Who wrote Mr. Big? I didnt care for it…I think I really became invested in ATWT during the whole Steve/Betsy/Craig triangle…of course the James/Gunnar/Barbara stuff too….. I also enjoyed the McColls which I believe were created by the Dobsons? I wish Marland had kept them on the canvas when he arrived…although we did see Brian on occasion but it was only he and Lisa….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • Cheap21
      BTG: May 2025 Discussion Thread

      By Cheap21 · Posted

      I didnt mean that I thought he would kill her; just that he gave off the impression that he had the capacity to do so. The original Ted portrayed him with more of a dark side when they were together. Its the switch up I see in True Crime stories when an upstanding pillar of the community ends up doing heinous things under people's noise whom would never beleive  he'd do when in actuality, he's a covert monster. Thats a dichotomy in the character as portrayed by Maurice that I dont see anymore
    • victorlord75
      GH: Classic Thread

      By victorlord75 · Posted

      I think one mistake that later writers made with Gail was to make her either Lee's angelic wife or the therapist that was an easy dupe for evil characters that required treatment.  Under Marland, there was a series of scenes where Tracy goaded Lee to drink, Jessie witnessed it and spilled the beans about what she saw to Gail.  Gail, then, in turn, ripped Tracy a new one.  I wish that Gail and Tracy scene still existed on YouTube.  It was glorious not only to see evil Tracy be put in her place, but to see some real fire from Gail.
    • kalbir
      BTG: May 2025 Discussion Thread

      By kalbir · Posted

      I won't be. We all know that the shelf life of a villainess isn't very long. Trisha Mann-Grant is the breakout star of BtG and she is destined for bigger and better things.
    • kalbir
      Search For Tomorrow Discussion Thread

      By kalbir · Posted

      I feel CBS/P&G got really shaken by 1978-1982 ABC huge rise and domination, thus the changes to the shows. Considering Capitol showed no growth, I wonder if CBS ever regretting cancelling Search for Tomorrow. From the 1980s Ratings thread, Capitol pretty much inherited Search for Tomorrow audience but Capitol ratings were impacted when One Life to Live rebounded in 1985 with Andrea Evans return. Remember Capitol was head-to-head with the second half of One Life to Live. Even if CBS kept Search for Tomorrow, I think it would've ended as soon as Bill Bell had a second show ready. Funny thing is Search for Tomorrow NBC run was only three months shorter that Capitol run.
    • Maxim
      B&B: May 2025 Discussion Thread

      By Maxim · Posted

      This was Bill's most complicated moment. The pecs stole the show and what was left from Brooke's dignity.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • carolineg
      GH: May 2025 Discussion Thread

      By carolineg · Posted

      You are going to be so proud of me because I agree.  I kept thinking why is Sonny/Mo getting all the dialogue and gate keeping everyone's feelings when there are 3 other capable actors in these scenes?  Ned should have told Sonny to shut up lol. I am fine with Sonny getting a reaction, but he got 90% of the airtime for his reaction.  I don't even think it's mental health that's keeping his job.  MB wouldn't get this much time on screen if it was a pity thing.  Frank is too afraid to cut Sonny because of fan reaction.  I know there aren't any Sonny fans here, but I do think there are Sonny fans out there (besides me) lol.
    • VelekaCarruthers
      Search For Tomorrow Discussion Thread

      By VelekaCarruthers · Posted

      I've been looking at the ratings during and after each head writer switch.  The ratings during Marcus' tenure (Oct 74 to April 75) were very good but at first not quite as high a Upton's (who was there six months prior. Marcus left when Mary Hartman was picked up as she was a creator and head writer). I've watched Marcus' interviews on Youtube; she discusses most of the soaps she worked on. She liked the money; she's not all warm and fuzzy about writing for them. She loved nighttime genres that gave her writing more flexibility than soapy dramas. But she was good at writing soaps.  By April 75, SFT was no.2 in the ratings behind ATWT. O'Shea was next (lasted 18 months) and in May 75, SFT high No. 1. When O'Shea left the show as still in the top five. O'Shea moved to OLTL in 77? but not as head writer so not sure why she left SFT. The Corringtons were the safest bet to keep long term. They needed to change direction by 1980 as the ratings were  dropping but still very solid 6s/low 20s share). They should have expanded the show to an hour and given the Corringtons some direction and more budget. One has to wonder about two people who were with the show for a long time: Mary Ellis Bunim was promoted to EP when she was about 28, amazingly and a woman! She as talented but she went through at 11 head writer changes if she started in 1974.  Here's her list of writers: Theodore Apstein (January 1974 – May 1974) 5 mo Gabrielle Upton (May 1974 – November 1974) 6 mo Ann Marcus (October 1974 - April 1975) 6 mo Peggy O’Shea (April 1975 – November 1976) 18 mo Irving Elman (with James Lipton) (November 1976 – Summer 1977) 9 mo Robert J. Shaw with Charles/Patti Dizenzo (August 1977 - Spring 78) 6-9 mo? Henry Slesar (Spring 78 to August 78) 3-4 mo? Corringtons (August 1978 to May 1980) 1 yr/9mo Linda Grover/John Porterfield (May 1980 to mid July 1980) 3 mo. Gabrielle Upton (July 1980 to at least through March or April) Harding Lemay April to June 81 writers' strike Don Chastain (Summer 1981 writers' strike - replaced by Ellis/Hunt Dec 81 or Jan 82) Then Fred Bartholemew comes in when Bunim goes to ATWT (Oct 81?) and he brings in Ellis Hunt for the NBC switchover, they lasted 11 months. Mary Stuart is the other mystery to me: how was she to work with? Did she instigate many of the writer firings? Was she not involved at all. No other P&G show went through this kind of frenetic change. (The Doctors might be a close second but wasn't on as long and not P&G).
    • Forever8
      BTG: May 2025 Discussion Thread

      By Forever8 · Posted

      I'm getting the sense that something happened between Anita and Dante Green that wasn’t exactly copacetic, to say the least. I wonder — did he promise her fame and fortune as a solo artist, and then attack her when she rebuffed his advances? I hope it’s not a long-lost child plot lurking out there for her. Maybe she left behind an sibling in poverty or something instead, back in Cabrini-Green/Chicago. It does seem like neither Tracy nor Sharon’s solo careers turned out the way they dreamed — both ended up singing at City Wineries. I still think Leslie is connected to the Duprees — maybe her mother is Sharon, and she's going after the Duprees because she believes she could’ve had their lifestyle if things had gone differently for her mom. She does have ties to Chicago. That said, I hope this is the last disguise from her toolbox for a while — I’d hate for that to get played out. But I do wonder if she’s going to use Nicole 2.0 to frame Nicole for something down the line? I’m all for giving Shanice more time on canvas, and I wouldn’t hate it if she and Andre became an item — someone who doesn’t mind being public, unlike Dani. Or I can see Doug finally getting fed up with their arrangement and turning to the nurse for some “relief.” Vanessa was, in a way, telling herself off in those scenes with Ted about his cheating. And I have to say, Keith Robinson’s Ted brings a broader range of emotion than Maurice Johnson’s did — though I think Ted 2.0 is benefitting from better writing than OG Ted, whose arc relied more on MJ’s charisma and physical presence. That said, as someone else pointed out, Keith looks like he’s drowning in the clothes they’ve got him in. Hopefully, they’ve got some better-fitted attire lined up now.
    • carolineg
      DAYS: May 2025 Discussion Thread

      By carolineg · Posted

      They are just right there in your face.  It's hard to not see Ciara's boobs at all times.  And simmer down camera man, this is a family show!! The high school stuff makes it weird.  Physically the actors all look fine together.  It just makes me think Doug needs to find friends his own age.   With Ari at least Doug was under the impression she was over 21. I liked JJ and Eve too lol!
    • Contessa Donatella
      GH: May 2025 Discussion Thread

      By Contessa Donatella · Posted

      Specifically that's Kat & she is, there's no other way to say it except like pulling off a band-aid. She's Chad's "#1 fan" IOW, basically, kinda sorta she's an albatross around Chad's neck.  Kat can turn any conversation into a discussion of Chad & what he ate for breakfast or the most minute of minute things about Chad Duell's life & times.  We hope she's not dangerous. We hope she's just boring. That Chad is not back has lit a fire under her. She's upped her number of posts, which all relate in some way to Chad. Now you know what there is to know about as I said Chad Duell's #1 fan.     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

  I accept