19 hours ago, Taoboi said:

Well, I am going to watch anyway. F@CK Bravo. And we know I'm serious when I use the actual word and not fudge, frak, frell, etc.

I'm so glad you will continue watching. It's a short season and worth the investment, IMO. It starts off pretty easy-breezy before the slow-burn drama manifests.

15 hours ago, DaytimeFan said:

This is a tragedy and just goes to show that Bravo is like ABC under Brian Frons. Always making the choice to do exactly the opposite of what viewers want. The show was universally acclaimed and so much better than most of what Bravo has to offer. It was actually aspirational. What a shame.

Aspirational, but foreign, and maybe that is what turned US viewers off from watching. Even though, I was listening to US pods and they loved the show. It's is a shame as I think this show was very accessible for viewers outside the UK.

It's another bone-headed decision alongside pausing RHOMiami. When Miami was on Peacock only, it got not just US views but worldwide ones. It was super popular in Europe and LatAm. Ladies of London could have been pitched to a world-wide audience on streaming, instead of relying only on the US network for its live demos.

I will especially miss Mark-Francis, Lady Martha and Kimi, who were standouts. Shout-out to Misse and Lady Emma for moving story along and being collective voices of reason. I hope we see some of these people again on-screen.

9 minutes ago, Cat said:

I'm so glad you will continue watching. It's a short season and worth the investment, IMO. It starts off pretty easy-breezy before the slow-burn drama manifests.

So irked. You just don't know. You know how excited I was before it premiered as an OG fan of the show. And so far...it's giving. Modernizing the concept started in the original show. And it was fascinating. The fact they were already giving tea and shade was impressive. And you know I looooove a good slow-burn.

Like I said yesterday...I just don't get it.