Jump to content

We Love Soaps' Take on GH


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Spot On is the best way to describe it. Spot the !@#$%^&*] on.

And as the article states people need to understand IT'S OK to criticize. I'm already regretting reading some of the comments because it's like some fans will do whatever it takes to excuse the bullshit that's going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sorry, but it started off as crap, so it's difficult to lend credibility to anything else said.

Anyone who begins an article with "FrankenRon saved GH" is an idiot. The Revolution tanking and the subsequent tanking of GMIA saved GH. Brought back the vets? Where are they? Carlypalooza to showcase the great CarSon bond/hoax while AJ is dead when they never acknowledge what was done to him by CarSon?

Yawn!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Andrea, the last part is accurate (and very good points are made), but I get what you're saying. And to be honest, those shows tanking probably did save GH to some degree. Don't fool yourself. GH was GONE. Not to say that I'm going to just sit back and appreciate the show is on with the [!@#$%^&*] I'm being fed. And Ron needs to be told to get off of Twitter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree that some of it was spot on, but the article started off very faulty, and it's difficult to get past that.

I know when writing an article, you have to appear to be objective, but you also have to state facts! 52 contracted characters was not mentioned at all. The OFFSCREEN "storytelling" was not mentioned. Yeah Ron is an asswhipe on Twitter, but that is not worth mentioning.

Tell me why FrankenTodd is a fail. Go into that detail. Why O as COS goes against everything a credible soap should be. I need more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh I agree. There needs to be WAY more because I could probably write a small novel on what's wrong with this show. And the few things they do right shouldn't be used to excuse the [!@#$%^&*].

I love how one commenter said that Nathan's paternity should have waited. IT SHOULDN'T HAVE HAPPENED AT ALL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hope he does (sort of) so he can make a fool out of himself trying to excuse and defend everything. But at the same time I also pray he doesn't because he comes off delusional. He has to realize that criticism is OK. The problem has been that his ego has been built up for years now and he's way too far up in the clouds to ever come down from it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't believe that idiot started the article by saying RC and FV have done many things right. RC and FV are both damn fortunate to have jobs. There's no professionalism when it comes to RC.

Jim Reilly was a joke of a writer but he was so superior to Carlivati in every way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

By the time HacknHack came to GH, it was already saved. Not sure who recalls but Sweeney wanted all 3 gone with one bullet then decided that one show would be salvaged in case the replacements didn't work. Frons made the decision that GH would be survivor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • It definitely did. Nothing major, but I clocked the minor changes too. Passions did something similar with its theme in the later years and people thought I was crazy, but the nuances are there if you're paying attention. 
    • What? A nice little mini-marathon of catching up before work.    YES, PLEASE. 
    • I guess they copied literally everything from that C&R scene, the dialogue etc 
    • And even then...you have to wait a couple of weeks to be sure he's actually dead.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Apparently. lol.  Well you know I don't mind standing also with the cheese so  
    • I have nothing to add. Everything you said is on point, and I don't know whether to laugh hysterically at it or throw things at the television. I do know it's terrible soap opera.  
    • Characterization: - I realized I have PTSD from Ted #1’s constant swaying. The moment I saw NuTed, I actually caught myself thinking, “Why isn’t he rocking?” - Leslie makes very little sense from a storytelling perspective unless she’s completely psychotic. What was she hoping to achieve with all her dramatic reveals and aliases? Also… who wouldn’t put two and two together after Laura’s accident? - Anita and Dani come across as mean-spirited, and honestly, the Duprees should just be portrayed as full-on villains. Been saying this since day one—remember when Dani punched Haley and the whole Dupree clan just walked away from her with that “shame on you” look? Wrong on so many levels. Glad others are finally seeing it too. - Mona is sanctimonious and I can’t stand her. She’s the worst kind of person: lower-to-middle class but constantly making excuses for the rich. - Call me crazy, but I’m actually enjoying Ashley and Derek’s storyline. I’ll take this neurotic OCD queen over the sanctimonious, multi-talented nurse any day. Plus, soap couples are usually so plastic. They deal with insane drama but never go to the bathroom, never plan a weekend away. Look at Kat and Tomas—every scene is just them planning lunch or dinner…! - Btw by now André seems bored af by Ashley.   WTF Moments: - No young woman would be even remotely interested in going to a casino (looking at Eva). And it’s wild how the show is treating gambling like it’s some kind of therapeutic hobby—like retail therapy or something. - What are they doing with Smitty’s eyebrows… and more importantly, why?   Parallels with Other Soaps: - I like Nicole, but she reinforces my belief that soaps should never include psychiatrists. If they’re portrayed accurately, they ruin the fun by rationalizing everyone’s childish and selfish behavior. If they’re portrayed inaccurately (hi Taylor from B&B), it’s equally bad. - Anita’s story is giving major SSM vibes from 2017‘s Y&R, when Victor got Nikki to start playing the piano again.  - Karla played a model on B&B too…

      Please register in order to view this content

        Direction & Continuity: - Pascarelli is hands down the worst director this show has. - Wednesday’s episode started with a nighttime establishing shot of Orphey Gene’s… but all the scenes that followed were clearly set in daytime—until halfway through the episode, when it suddenly switched back to night. - The picture on the piano at the Duprees’ house shows two little girls and two little boys. Who are the boys? One could be Martin (or Tyrell?), but who’s the other kid? (And speaking of pictures… no one under 50 is walking around with a printed photo in their pocket. But I digress.) - I love catching the time on the phones when they pop up onscreen. Friday’s episode was supposedly set before lunch, but Vernon’s phone said 3:15 in one scene and 3:50 in the next. A few scenes later, Kat is playing Leslie’s audio for Jacob and her phone shows 10:40. Cool. 
    • I forget that throughout the 80’s the TV seasons were officially over in April. Not sure why that was the case but it wasn’t until the mid-90’s that May Sweeps became a real official thing.  Because my teenage self stayed home often on Saturday nights in the early 90’s I watched Empty Nest just about every night to the bitter end, I do actually always felt a bit sad whenever I see that GG ep knowing that Rita’s character will die with that last line “Good night!” For years I admit I had the Mandela effect that Mulligan was in the episode before I finally caught it again on Lifetime.    And yes lol I don’t care for David Leisure’s character in the episode but somehow was funnier than anything on Empty Nest. Same when Charley crossed over for Dorothy’s Jeopardy dream. 
    • Jon Lindstrom proved with Ryan Chamberlain on GH that he can play menacing and evil. He's not doing it here, and I think it's a combination of writing and performance.   To be fair, Longoria has modeled and has represented major companies like L'Oreal, but she was never a runway model. I don't have any problem with seeing Dani as a runway model. I think it's more than possible, and I don't understand anyone criticizing her look. I actually have a bigger problem with the whole "Anita is an EGOT" thing. I think it goes way too far. Give her a Grammy. Say she was nominated for a Tony, or even won. But an EGOT winner? No.   The fact that you're using DAYS to defend a BTG set is telling, since we all know DAYS is poverty level soapdom. I expect so much more and better from Gates.     I can't help it, but I'm LOL at the people defending that backroom bingo hall casino and making excuses for it. It's hilariously bad.  
    • If NBC could have for seen the ratings of Lovers & Friends (the replacement for Somerset).. they would have for sure kept Somerset on the air longer. https://jason47.com/days/ratings1976.html  (ratings for Somerset in the final year) https://jason47.com/days/ratings1977.html (ratings for Lovers & Friends short run...getting as low as a 2 rating).  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy