Jump to content

Shows you forget were on at the same time


DRW50

Recommended Posts

  • Members

There is often an idea that TV moves into different eras. Is there ever a time when, in your head, you just can't remember that certain shows intersected?

For me, it's stuff like Beverly Hillbillies and All in the Family. Of course, they were only on together for a very brief amount of time, but I'd still love to go back to early 1971 and see if these shows shared any fans whatsoever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Wasn't the final season of "That Girl" running simultaneously with the first season of "The Mary Tyler Moore Show"? I'll bet viewers (and young female viewers, at that) took one look at the latter show and realized right away what had been missing on the former. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes they did. That's a good point.

I'd say any of the 60s escapist comedies next to the Lear stuff. So, for example, Bewitched and All in the Family, Family Affair and All in the Family (FA's last season was concurrent with AITF's last season), and The Brady Bunch and Sanford & Son (the latter knocked the former off the air after BB's 5th season by regularly beating it in its' time slot).

Could I just say the names Ed Sullivan, Lawrence Welk, Gunsmoke, Bonanza, Hee Haw Law & Order (the Mothership), and ER against pretty much any other show they were on against at the end of their runs and have it pretty obvious what their common link is? wink.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Granted, I was younger and never watched it, but I was very surprised when I later learned that Knots Landing last through 1993, 3 years into the 90's while the other 80's prime time soaps were long gone. 90210 was already graduating high school and Amanda & Alison were fighting over Billy on Melrose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

Totally right about MSW and Friends. I don't think I would remember that if not for the highly publicized move of Les Moonves throwing MSW to the wolves to kill it off.

Also true about Knots and the Fox soaps. To Knots' credit, they managed to adapt surprisingly well.

This is another example. I can't quite process shows like Love Boat being on at the same time as Moonlighting. Of course this was the last season for Love Boat, and I think Benson too.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWDNugYl_N8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To me, The Golden Girls feels very '80s and very early '90s. There are three distinct eras/tones of the show: the darker teleplay-like first year, the campy middle years, and the early '90s ironic/sardonic final years. TGG and 227 debuted on the same night when I was in the first grade and my family never missed Saturday night NBC. The '90s episodes were so hilarious when they first aired and through the first few rounds of syndication, but I don't think they've aged as well as the earlier episodes. That early '90s humor that Cherry brought to the show has a very dated ring to it. The humor of the earlier seasons is more timeless.

FOL debuted within days of my birth and it's one of the few shows I remember watching first run and in syndication at the same time. It feels '80s all around, but Over Our Heads is especially late '80s. The Max on Saved by the Bell used to remind me of that set.

Antenna TV ran a Bewitched marathon on Halloween eve. When they showed the dates of production, it dawned on me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I didn't watch MSW but my friend in high school did and I remember her telling me about the last episode that involved a mystery on a Friends-like sitcom set. She said the episode was really good, particularly Jessica's epilogue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I also sometimes forget about Knots lasting until '93 because while my parents watched regularly, I did knot. I got into it in syndication on TNT which started practically immediately after the show went off the air, if knot sooner (I promise that's the last time). So seeing those '79 and '80s episodes made me feel like the show had been gone longer than it really was. I was at my friend's house and we were watching a movie she had recorded on CBS and I was surprised to see Michele Lee in this longish CBS stars holiday greeting. This was around '97, so the show hadn't been gone long at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No pun intended.

I think the only real way you can tell the show was still on at that point is the fashions and the weird mix of minimalism and clinging to camp that was early 90s TV. I do wish they'd gotten a little more time to see how they would have moved out of the Sumner Group era, but I think it might have been time to go.

I vastly prefer the first few Golden Girls years to anything after. The later seasons lost the earnestness and became very broad, while still trying for sentiment. Doesn't work for me.

I always forget how long Dukes of Hazzard lasted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I would be fascinated to see the GL episode counts from that time, if they existed. Six years seems like a long time, but Reva was front burner 24/7. I don't see how she could've done episodic tv. The only breaks she really got were her maternity leaves. And it's not like even the late '90's when there were shows shooting in NY (well, mostly L&O).
    • I've been pondering how strange it is that in real life NLG was being more supportive of Haley Pullos than I would have been ....  and now Alexis is doing that for Kristina.
    • Natalia worrying about her dress getting dirty during her DUI arrest had to be a reference to Haley Pullos and the $400 shirt.   The birth scene was really good. It could have been OTT but wasn't. There was this great moment was Michael was talking about how he's seen every sonogram and been with her all the way where it registered with Willow that he's been extremely involved with this and she had no idea but then couldn't say anything because she's obviously cheating too. And then they acknowledged each other and he actually thanked her. It was very humanizing for both characters.
    • This show treats Claire like a glorified extra prop not the granddaughter of the 2 biggest supercouples this show has ever had. I don't think was ever invested in Claire nor writing for her & her connections to majority of the town. What a waste of a legacy character with so much potential 
    • Kim Zimmer could have had a nice career as a supporting actress in Hollywood, but that does not appear to be what she wanted. That's fine, but in the eighties, she was not going to have many options as a leading actress. The eighties were brutal for a performer like her.  Her one big film role lasted a minute or two. Even while she was on GL, she should have been doing episodic television. Was her agent that incompetent or was she just bad at auditioning? Her episode of "Designing Women" was quite popular and was discussed at the time for its subject matter, but she never followed up on it. It's bizarre to me. 
    • Billy just showed up for Vanessa's memorial (Sept 9, '96), which is so nice!  My first time seeing him like this outside of random clips from the past. He's out of jail for 24 hours, so not long. It's good to see him with the family.
    • Definitely was more recent than not; when the set originally returned, the change hadn't happened.
    • It was nice seeing Victorias house and I see it’s been remodelled. I’m sure this happened awhile ago but since I tuned out from the show for so long I am only noticing it now. Looks beautiful though!  Also, Billy and Sally gross me out so much. I don’t know what it is I hate so much about them. They give me the ick. Definitely a mismatch. I don’t buy that these people would be attracted to eachother in real life much less have a relationship..
    • Please register in order to view this content

         

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy