Jump to content

Are All Aaron Sorkin Shows This Pretentiously Talky?


VirginiaHamilton

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Recently, I decided to check out Sports Night (since a fair share of folks have claimed that Aaron Sorkin-helmed shows are some of the most groundbreaking and intelligent shows in TV history) and I'm finding it pretentious as hell (though I reserve the right to change my mind as I go along). Not only is the speechifying and pretentious dialogue preventing me from actually getting to know the characters and their conflicts onscreen, I'm finding myself put off by the obvious liberal pandering (as much as I do subscribe to and live by that POV, I prefer that it'd be just a wee-bit more subtle in its execution).

Are these just symptoms of this show or do all Aaron Sorkin shows suffer from these ailments?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Sports Night was the first and last Sorkin show I tried to watch more than a few times. The characters constantly went around smirking at the brilliance of their one-liners. I've rarely seen a smugger show in my life, with more, as you say, pretentious dialogue. It took years for me to accept Krause, Huffman, or Charles in other roles.

His shows also get noticed for sexism.

http://www.salon.com/2013/09/09/aaron_sorkin_gets_more_sexist_every_year/singleton/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yep. That's Sorkin's style. Preachy, arrogant and unabashedly liberal. That's his trademark. Sometimes I've loved it (West Wing, Sports Night) other times it's just unbearable. I gave The Newsroom one viewing and couldn't take it but if you really want to see an ego-driven Sorkin trainwreck, check out Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not sure that I'd call what I've seen of Sports Night as "arrogant" just yet (I'm about halfway through the first season, as per FXX's reruns), but the sledgehammer method of its POV makes Boston Legal look subtle by comparison. If this is what makes Sorkin's shows "incredible" (as per what some have tried to sell me), then I'm going to have to pass on checking out the rest of them.

Sexism? Hmm, I'll have to pay a bit more attention to make that call (though I'll definitely check out the article). I've got my own opinion on certain privileged liberal males, but again, I don't think that I've seen enough of this show to apply it it here just yet.

What prompted this thread was an episode when Janel Maloney's character spent five minutes speechifying to Peter Krause's (who I actually do enjoy on Parenthood) character about the color of a shirt-and-tie combination because he failed to thank the wardrobe department when he'd guest-starred on The View. Had this been helmed in a more, well, subtle manner, then I would've appreciated it a lot more than wishing that he'd tell her to STFU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
    • And of course Mama Ru herself appeared on All My Children.
    • The Saturday 8pm slot usually had the lowest rating of the NBC 4 sitcom lineup for some reason. NBC let Saturday night fizzle, They used 9.30 pm to launch 227 and Amen, both of which moved to earlier in the evening but they  kept Empty Nest following GG for several seasons.  Empty Nest should have moved to 8pm with their strongest new sitcom at 9.30, anticipating that GG would eventually falter. Instead they left them there and stretching the sitcom pool too thinly on other nights. When Grand talk over at 9.30 Thurs maybe Night Court and Wings could have been used on Saturday.
    • @Maxim Great to see your mini-reviews again. There are a number of clips on Youtube of Janice's slow mental breakdown, especially as we go into January 1980. Christine Jones is just superb. She played the hell out of that role. Something which isn't referenced as much later on is how Mitch pushed Janice's doubts and mental instability for his own ends...until suddenly he didn't want to anymore (I guess he caught on with the audience and the show became wary). I don't want to post a bunch of clips, but this one has a very good confrontation between Rachel and Janice.

      Please register in order to view this content

      This has a good scene around 7 minutes in where you can see Janice struggling internally with her need to identify herself so much by the men around her, all of which helps lead to her crackup.  
    • It really made Oscar the Doorman seem like an imbecile.   I think the show's unusual format & subject manner is what makes EON often seem less "dated" and "old-fashioned" than other shows from that time period.  It never attempted to be especially "trendy" or "modern" -- and its film noir style is pretty timeless.  
    • Dallas, Dynasty, Knots and Falcon Crest all had good runs but by 85 they had seen better days. I think they were a victim of the format. After several seasons seeing the same characters front and center viewers were bored. What was once fascinating grew predictable. JR, Alexis etc had to be front and center and after a while their schemes and shtick grew repetitive. JR remarrying Sue Ellen, Alexis constantly trying to get he better of Blake etc Unlike daytime, there wasn't the flexibility to bring in other stories and characters and maybe let the likes JR go backburner. That same mentality also invaded daytime with characters like  Sonny and Victor still peddling the same stuff after decades. I guess the same could be said for MSW eg every week Jessica encounters a crime and solves it,but I think viewers come to that format with a different mindset.
    • Daphnee and Trisha did a live stream on Instagram and confirmed they find out if the show gets picked up in May. This pretty much confirms they're on the primetime schedule like the Bell soaps. Fingers crossed we get a multi-year renewal announcement soon!  https://www.instagram.com/reel/DJSsYb7PDv8/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==        
    • I don't think Lois the character was there.  The Lois we knew from the 90s has pretty much died with this  Gio story crap.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy