Jump to content

April 29 - May 3, 2013: Bad Week For All Soaps


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Actually, I was referring to all the soaps, not GH alone. Notice that I never mentioned GH my post that you quoted. I was also referring to the trend starting from last year and the year before. I should have been more specific there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Maybe this "GH and Y&R competition in the game of casting wars and ever growing and bloated cast with Y&R having too many scattered storylines going in too many directions and GH controversy with bringing back 3 OLTL characters in new roles and all that drama, well just turns off viewers who are tired of all of it. Both GH and Y&R need to just stop it and do a little downsizing of cast and wrap up some long winded storylines. Generally straighten up. Loss of the great dame Jeanne Cooper, will be interesting to see how ratings will go in the near future and the affect it might create.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think so. It's not like viewers have to choose between them. I'm happy they're back and all but let's not paint these two shows as some kind of juggernaut. They're part of the much needed evolution but there's still plenty more work to do. The ratings drop is probably more about the weather and some post anniversary drop off in GH's case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't see them as a competition either. To be honest that kind of baffles me.

I think it's just the usual drops, probably compounded with GH because the ratings only really began going up with vet returns. Outside of a few stunt returns, the show is horse [!@#$%^&*]. As always, "Cartini" falter when the hype goes away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not sure why it is baffling that a few hundred thousand people might have less time or desire to watch a TV soap if they are watching AMC and OLTL, especially if they were first and foremost AMC or OLTL fans before those shows were cancelled. There is only limited time in the day or week for people to watch entertainment.

500,000 viewers is reportedly what PP needed to be successful. We're not talking "juggernaut" level. PP viewers are still by and large soap fans, people who might have been watching the TV soaps; they are mostly not viewers recruited fresh from primetime, from playing videogames or reading, or from other Hulu shows.

I agree though that the PP shows need work and are not up to the standard of the network soaps at this time. I would definitely drop AMC right now before I dropped DAYS or GH (although I have no current plans to drop any, and I am still enjoying AMC, and want to support it regardless).

I hope the ratings are just weather-related though, because that'd be good news for my TV soaps!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I still don't understand the assumption that the people watching this extra hour of programming are doing so at the expense of the current soaps. Of course I also question the assumption made by many that AMC/OLTL viewers tuned into GH in droves. There seems to be this zero sum mentality about soap fans that loss in one area means gain in another.

The PP shows may be new but soaps on Hulu aren't. AMC and OLTL were on Hulu before cancellation. GH, Days and Coronation Street are on there now. I could see the argument that the PP soaps are simply pulling more soap fans to watch their soaps on Hulu instead of the networks but I don't believe people are leaving current soaps for these new ones they're just adding the new ones in to their list.

And whatever effect PP has on existing soaps is going to take a lot longer than two weeks to manifest. (It probably took all of the first week just for the Facebook braintrust to figure out how Hulu works. dry.png )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If the PP viewership is significant, it would have to show up in the television ratings at some point. It may not be as much as 100,000 more soap and this could be weather, but I'm not sure how you expect 500,000 people to make a success of AMC and OLTL and have that not take away in any way from the TV soaps' ratings. Where are these 500,000 people coming from with 2-4 more hours per week to watch the online soaps?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You keep assuming this is a closed system and it's not. You're coming from the TV model where these shows share time slots so in order to watch one you can't watch the other. You're also assuming that soap viewers only watch soaps. That's certainly not true. These viewers could simply be watching one less judge show or rerun of Roseanne on TV Land or do a little less time at the gym. In fact, now you can watch these shows while you're on the treadmill or on the train to work or sitting in the car waiting for the kids to finish soccer practice. The eyeballs for these shows could be coming from anywhere. The Good Wife just went on hiatus so now I've got an extra hour per week plus I gave up OUAT out of frustration so there you go -- bang -- two hours of viewing time freed up and none of it came from the network soaps since they didn't have my eyes to begin with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, the drop is absolutely because of the giant, entertainment juggernaut known as Prospect Park and their resurrection of cancelled soaps now appearing online. The network soaps just cant compete and every week from now until they are axed one by one shall continue to drop. Just like ratings are absolutely a reflection of what couple is on what day - i wish we had ratings by the minute because then we would see that when X couple is on more people watch and when the scene changed they tune to another show until their couple is back on.

GH, Days, YR and B&B better watch out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Also, the lawsuit story was not the right story to bring Naomi and Bill into a court battle since those types of lawsuits are usually resolved via settlements.
    • I know that Sara did eventually become Carrie's therapist, but I was curious if the show had her make comments regarding Carrie's stunts of making it seem as though Justin was cheating on Jackie.  Given that Justin cheated on Sara with both Jackie and Brandy, I wondered if it was wise of her to counsel Carrie given the conflict of interest involved. @DRW50I think once Adam/Sara end up married.. Marland didn't see any reason to explore Sara's personal life after the actor playing Adam was released.  I know that Sara lasts until at least Christmas 1982 on the show.. but I don't think she ended up staying on for very long into 1983. The period between Marland quitting and Pam Long starting was the perfect time to clean house on characters that had outgrown their usefulness  (i.e. Ben, Evie, Sara, Jennifer, Morgan).. and tying up stories started by Marland that were too complex (Mona Enright, Mark/Jennifer/Amanda triangle).
    • Unpopular opinion:  The focus on the soap opera tropes over the mysteries and crimes was partly what did the show in.  Also, featuring characters not involved in the legal, police, and criminal elements also hurt the show and took away what made it unique. Featuring characters like Jody, Raven, Sky, etc hurt the show long term.  The show ABCified starting in 1976/1977 and then went through a youthification period starting in 1981.  
    • I feel like the lawsuit storyline was resolved quickly because the show didn’t want to spring for more sets.
    • It's been a while, but we have seen the foyer to Bill and Hayley's house as well as the exterior entrance to their house. The foyer was first seen in the premiere episode when Hayley met Vanessa at the house.
    • There's still a year or two before Larkin arrives. Joel is there already. EON does noticeably youthify, although I think they carry it off. Admittedly I haven't seen most of the Jody stories, which from what people here have said aren't great.
    • I don't mind the actor who plays Brian. He's fine. The problem for me is that Paige seems so wishy wishy. She doesn't seem to have much of a personality at this point so I don't see why Brian would be so besotted with her. She just lurches from one trauma to the next. Granted, it's only been a month, but she's not as vibrant as April or even Deborah who has had minimal screen time by this point.  I do worry about the influence of GH on the show since I'm in fall of 1979 and characters have conversations and there's not the drive to "youthify" the show. However, I think Marceau (sp?) is gone. He was given a rather tame sendoff. How long was the actor on the show? I hope this is not a sign of things to come. I worry the show is setting up a murder mystery around one of my favorite characters and I will be mightily annoyed. I also noticed in recent Search for Tomorrow episodes uploaded to YT that the actors playing Logan and Eliot showed up. I don't watch the show but they were in the screencaps. When does Larkin Malloy show up or has he already left? Joel Crothers hasn't shown up either unless I've blinked and missed him.
    • Dr Linden. She treated Vanessa's drug addiction (although Vanessa seemed to forget that by Henry's suicide attempt) , and she's mentioned during Reva's PPD. Although I can't recall if she's actually shown right off the top of my head. She probably was temporarily shelved when Sonni was a therapist (between her crazy times) And I think Billy sees her after he falls off the wagon after Reva's death.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy