Jump to content

Does Taylor Swift think Amy Poehler and Tina Fey will burn in hell?


DRW50

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I have no other idea how to interpret this:

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/entertainment/2013/03/taylor-swift-insists-she-is-not-a-clingy-desperate-girlfriend/

Wow.

They were actually relatively low-key compared to many of the comments I've heard about Taylor Swift over the last year. They wouldn't have said it if other people weren't thinking it.

Their response:

http://www.eonline.com/news/394648/taylor-swift-s-quot-special-place-in-hell-quot-comment-tina-fey-surprised-amy-poehler-accepts-her-fate?cmpid=rss-000000-rssfeed-365-topstories&utm_source=eonline&utm_medium=rssfeeds&utm_campaign=rss_topstories

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Taken out of the original context it's horrible. Madeline Albright wasn't talking about celebrities at awards shows. I'm not a Katie Couric fan, but I'm not going to criticize her, as I have no idea what she actually said to Taylor Swift, but that type of comment about people who were joking over a love life Swift has cashed in on to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars is in awful taste. It's a little late to suddenly claim a private life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Swift's love life is a mockery and is done purely for publicity. I support anyone who calls her on that sh!t. That whole image of her's is wearing thin and more and more people seem to be catching on to her shtick

What would her career be if she wasn't singing songs allegedly about very famous men she's dated? Note that every relationship is with someone "coincidentally" famous, and she's been though so many famous men over the past 3 years that it's hard to even remember them all.

I know that being a pop star is partly about the image, but she and her marketing team are so transparent and misguided that it's no longer funny or cute. It just looks nasty and desperate that they attempt to pass her off with famous man after famous man. I mean, Harry Styles and Connor Kennedy were barely 18 when she sought them out for publicity for her career...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Taylor is coming for the wrong ladies. She is way out of her league here. Thing is, she's a "little girl" to them and they won't eviscerate her with their wit. They're too kind, and Taylor is taking herself too seriously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And so the backlash begins. As South Park so brilliantly put it in their "Britney's New Look" episode, any successful woman must absolutely be torn to shreds at all costs.

Not even a fan of Taylor Swift's music, but other women tearing her apart for her dating life made her quote justified IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I do think this is common with some women, but I don't think Tina Fey and Amy Poehler make a habit of this. They've made some pretty harsh quotes against men as well as women, at the awards and throughout their careers. The comments against Cameron and Quentin Tarantino were much harsher, but both men seemed to take them OK (or didn't comment). They joked about her love life, which she's made the central part of her career. If they were trashing her looks or calling her shaming names, then I'd sympathize with her, but they were addressing what she's let be the entire public image of Taylor Swift.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And that is the problem I've had with her music. I liked "Teardrops On My Guitar" but then she kinda just did that over and over. But the backlash hasn't been over her music, which it should be because it's stale, it's been against her as a person. It's the same thing Madonna went through in the early 90s with the sex thing, and she then spazzed out and did the, "I'm too sexual? I'll show you too sexual" which almost killed her career but I loved it. I hope Taylor will do something similar now that she has encountered the traditional backlash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think part of the problem is she's let this define her as well as her music. She used to be known as a goofy girl that was unpretentious and allowed other young women to see someone who wasn't the typical Disney Channel confection or sexualized robot. She seems to have lost most of this, and I get that it hurts to be called out on an awards show, but she should take it as a wake-up call, not an insult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It really was.

LMAO really? So she's a hypocrite because if I recall that song was about Camilla (or whoever else but I believe the general consensus was that Camilla was who she was referring to) and this is one chick that shouldn't throw stones when you live in a glass house. God forbid no one ever make a joke about you and the merry go round of relationships (be they real or fake) that you have, get used to it. It was a quote that needs to be attributed to something that could probably be deemed as god awful if Woman A did or said it to Woman B. A joke is hardly in that category.

God I would love someone to drag her regarding that lyric.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I haven’t watched since Daisy’s last episode. Part of me feels like its a good place to end it because outside of The Platt’s, Tracy, Todd, and Carla and Swain I haven’t really enjoyed the show. Too many depressing stories and irksome characters, I especially hate what they’re doing to Debbie. I do think its funny they spent all this time investing into that awful new family and apparently they’ve already been canned, feedback must have been horrid.
    • I think the pre-Barnabas episodes are very underrated both for dialogue and character. They're slow but they really create a world and fill out the characters, imbuing them with heavy dimension that ultimately will have to sustain them for years as the show largely stops writing for character after it returns from 1795. What we know about them by then is what they have to power them. (I don't think the show was bad after, I actually love it in '68 and often in times after that, but it was very different.) I think the B&W episodes with Barnabas' early days are especially frightening - they terrified me as a kid - but the color stuff in '67 is also very strong, especially in the stretch where Julia is on the run, Carolyn is under Barnabas' control, and you get the sense that events have gone off the rails for the regular characters and anything goes. As a child viewer seeing it in syndication on the Sci-Fi Channel, who had no idea who lived or who died, it was a lot. Mitch Ryan is especially powerful in the early pre-Barnabas era as the sort of Byronic Burke Devlin character. You knew they had to kill him once Barnabas comes in, despite Ryan's alcohol problem making it impossible to keep him at the show - Burke dominates the first year or so as the fulcrum character, he's incredibly magnetic and charismatic. You couldn't see him becoming a dupe for Barnabas and Julia, as Anthony George's more benign, mild version briefly does before getting unceremoniously killed off. I always found Burke's offscreen plane crash death very eerie and suspicious, and I think the show does toy with the question if Barnabas' powers somehow got him on that plane and if he took it down. I had always wanted Burke to return one day, in any revival project, as a kind of vengeful power broker and puppet master, driven by Vicki's inevitable demise to get revenge on Barnabas and co. I still have Art Wallace's "Shadows on the Wall" DS bible somewhere. IIRC in the earliest versions of the plot Vicki was going to somehow be tied to the butler or his daughter - Betty Hanscomb or something. I don't remember the exact details. I do know there's all sorts of raised and dropped plotlines and characters offscreen in '66, like Ned Calder, the man they clearly intended to pair with Liz and so on. I've always found '66 very rich, but I don't begrudge the show after for it because it's still awfully well-written, specifically the early Barnabas stuff.
    • I totally agree with this, as most of you seem to. Mary Carney was at least competent and reasonably likable; I just feel like she barely had anything of substance to do before she was abruptly given the hook. And I get the backstory of Kathleen Tolan having done a play with Helen Gallagher, but...at any point did they ever actually READ her before they greenlit her? Because...OOF. First time I saw her on SoapNet was right when this GODAWFUL actress named Charity Rahmer played Belle on Days of Our Lives for all of three weeks before she was mercifully recast; her line readings were straight out of a Charlie Brown special. I remember thinking Kathleen Tolan could have played her mother! In the Frank/Jill/Delia triangle, Delia WAS the one who was cheated on, so I got why she was upset and thought it was perfectly valid in theory at least, but of course it was blown up to Wagnerian proportions including falls involving staircases and tricycles. But with Pat/Faith/Delia I had no sympathy for her...especially because it was mainly with Catherine Hicks's Faith and I really liked her.
    • I was going through those episodes from 1984 and early 1985 before they were taken down. Some of the older characters, like Don and even Tom, looked a little out of place, like they were on the wrong show. But the newer characters were fun. It's too bad they lost the character of Melissa. I guess Jennifer took her long-term place on the canvas. 
    • How I will remember him...

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • The black and white episodes of the show are very special. An atmosphere the color run loses. Dark Shadows was filmed live-on-tape. They could do a retake but it would be very expensive. I think there was a claim that if actors wanted a retake they would curse. There was also a rumor that at one point Joan Bennett accidentally said "Hollywood" instead of "Collinwood" and that necessitated a retake.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Angela Lansbury stars as Jessica Fletcher in one of the longest-running and most beloved TV series of all-time, Murder, She Wrote. Set in Cabot Cove, Maine, Jessica is a mystery writer and amateur detective who is quick to outwit both criminals and the police when it comes to solving a murder. Winner of 4 Golden Globes and nominated for 12 consecutive Primetime Emmy Awards for Best Actress in a Drama, the series showcases unforgettable guest stars including Tom Bosely, George Clooney, Shirley Jones, Courteney Cox, Leslie Nielsen, Mickey Rooney, Tom Selleck, John Amos, Dorothy Lamour, Cyd Charrise and many more. In Murder, She Wrote: The Complete Series, help Jessica get to the bottom of every crime she encounters in this completely remastered collection featuring all 264 episodes, 4 TV movies, and bonus features. Special Features: "Novel Connection" (Crossover Episode of Magnum P.I.); The Great 80's TV Flashback; Origin of a Series; Recipe for a Hit; America's Top Sleuths; The Perils of Success
    • Loved this IG post from Ambyr about how she and Trisha work together. You can tell these ladies go above and beyond the script, and that they really trust and enjoy working together. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DJpJufFPOQ2/?igsh=MXBmcWs0YzIwaXVhNA==  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • It is a shame that more characters didn't go the ATWT-Barbara route and make the ingénue into an antagonist. Sort of like they did with Liza/Hogan/Sunny, less successfully. It is a credit to ATWT's creativity that breathed life in that character for years after she was fighting off bulls in Spain.  But, a character like Liza can only have so many true loves and high jinks on the high seas.  They need another reason to be in the story. Liza's wealth, as well as her acumen to see through fraud, was fertile ground for tons of stories.  But, I feel like the business stories for Liza were always about her being easily overwhelmed, rather than exploring things like her leadership and managerial skills.
    • STFU!! Dante!!! This nonsense of blaming Gio is just ridiculous! Alexis and Lucky are becoming so unlikable. Why are the writers writing these characters so poorly?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy