Jump to content

Bill Has Done it Again!


Sundance

Recommended Posts

  • Members

One who isn't hypocritical enough to lambast a group of people for engaging in behavior that he's participated in, starters. It'd also make quite a difference if said message was delivered with the true intent of helping people instead of speaking down to them in an attempt to make themselves feel superior.

While I can't speak at length about Boy George's outlook on LGBT youth (as I am not a part of that community and don't feel that I've got more to offer than just surface opinions), I can say that Dr. Cosby's insistence that we follow his tenets in order to prove white folks wrong only serves to hurt the Black community in the end. As I've said before, having a Eurocentric name and being 'socially acceptable' is hardly a shield against for the racist double-standards that I and other Negroes have dealt with for centuries. The effect that the current unemployment crisis has had on us in this country is proof of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Thank the Oakland, CA school teachers who felt equating American born children with children who were freshly immigrated from Mexico made all the sense in the world. Yes, let's pretend that black students needed an ESL (English as a second language) because they cannot speak English. So kids who were born here speak some unique language that not all the black children speak and is not associated with any African nation but it's a black thing. That's another example of what's wrong with education in America--some of the teachers are not that smart. California makes it easy to get teaching credentials though, or at least they did. I am unsure whether that's been rectified yet.

As for the other can of worms, I don't like the word but unfortunately it appears in movies and even songs I may like. I don't object to it when it's used in literature or in films which refer to particular times in history. I don't see any reason why a present day movie has to be laced with it. That said, it's none of my business what people want to call themselves. As long as those people who swim in the word don't expect everyone to get hysterical if someone white says it or even calls them back. Look if some crusty old white man calls Kanye West or Jay-Z what they call themselves, what's that to me?

Slavery is like some sort of go word. History is important but it is history and not present day. It shouldn't be the reason that people claim they cannot get ahead today as this makes no sense. No slaves are alive as far as I know nor are any of the slave masters. It's unfair and unrealistic to try to make people who had nothing to do with it, feel guilty over it or pay for it. Those people who think it's right to do that should ask themselves whether they would want to be held responsible if their mother or father caused a car accident that resulted in a large monetary judgment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I swear, nothing burns me up more than this sentiment. Slavery didn't exist in a vacuum, where once it ended up and all those involved with it were gone, its ramifications ceased to be. Cause, effect, cause, effect, cause, effect. Life is a cycle, things happen because other things happened first. Do you believe that we are living with no effects of slavery in today's society? The simple fact that we are even having this discussion is evidence to the contrary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Basically I don't see slavery as a reason that a kid should score poorly on a test. I don't see it as a reason for anyone not getting ahead today, as I said before.

If it didn't stop men like Frederick Douglass or Booker T. Washington then it should not stop anyone today---particularly since today they were not slaves and those two actually had more to overcome.

I can technically make a cause and effect for anything and go back as far as I want to do it, including the Revolutionary War. If this that and the other hadn't happened, then this that and the other wouldn't have happened either.

I'm personally not living with any effects of slavery. And since I believe that slavery predates racism then my participation in this thread is not related to slavery either.

And since I don't have anything more to add to this thread, I shall take my leave.

All the Best to You.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It doesn't exempt everyone immediately, but it moves the perception of the community forward, hence the reason we have a black 2 term president today, something that nobody would have dreamed of in the 50's. And backsilding on education and the ability to speak properly will do nothing but hold back progress. All for what? Exactly what purpose does ebonics serve? Is it THAT important to people that they are willing to give up complete acceptance by society in the future for it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're moving the topic around. He said "why do these kids speak in a way that they sound like idiots?" (paraphrase) It was said here "Yes, but systemic racism prevents children of color from attaining full command of English, and as someone who experienced racism at the height of its sway over society, he should know this". So then I said "Yes, and the fact he manages to construct simple sentences like 'where are you?' rather than 'where you be at?' goes a long way to proving one of his points." So now you say "Fine, but there is still racism and he will still be prejudiced against, so what differences does it make how he speaks? "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am supposed to be done with this thread as I was certain I had nothing else to say but then I looked back and saw what you posted. You reminded me of how unfocused I was.

The thing that I should have said is that the whole message of addressing the disparity in education got completely lost in the attacks on Bill Cosby. I believe that he cares. He is part of that generation that practiced the village raising the child. It probably frustrates him, as well as others, to see how far away from that we've all strayed and the results.

As you pointed out, he grew up in a time where the advantages that are available to today's youth were non-existent and he learned as did others in similar or even worse situations. Some of those elders are probably more than upset to see how opportunities they wished thay had, are wasted.

How do you tell a child not to worry about learning how to read or write properly because the child is going to face discriminaton anyway? Is that a legitimate reason for a child to be placed at an even further disadvantage?

It's important to recognize that not everyone is going to be able to or even want to, but why be complicit in causing the kids who want to succeed to be bullied out of reaching or attempting to realize their dreams by those who want to be roadblocks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm screaming at those clips and gifs.  THIS IS PURE GOLD.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's always been my thought. I can't imagine that the show would play up the unseen AD so far in advance without them casting a *star*. After today's episode, I wonder if he'll somehow be connected with Diane. It was strange that Diane mentioned her very distant family today. I can't recall Diane ever talking about her backstory. Maybe he's her much younger brother?  It's also possible he's connected to Diane during her time in LA. Sally's already said she crossed paths with him. OC, I think Dumas is Mariah's mistake.... As a side note, it was good to see some mixing it up - Adam with Clare/Kyle and Sharon with Tessa.
    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
    • I don't think so, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was Dumas this whole time.
    • Tamara Tunie was serving up grand dame diva fierceness.
    • Nick told Victoria that he and Sharon had married in England.  Victoria was shocked.  Then she realized he was kidding.  He confirmed it was a joke and they're platonic. I don't even know what to say about that.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy