Jump to content

January 23-27, 2006


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

What utter revisionist nonsense.

During Reilly's second tenure, Days has routinely been in 6th or 7th place in the ratings. On the odd occasions he has been able to pull Days into the top 3, it has usually co-incided with "Shocking event XXX". If Higley had opted to kill off 10 characters or the child of a supercouple, I have no doubt similar spikes would have been achieved (and I'm certainly no fan of Higley's).

And the fact that other soaps have lost more viewers is hardly a compelling defence of JER's writing.

As for the claim that Jack/Jennifer don't bring in ratings, the daily ratings last year showed that episodes featuring the supercouples consistently drew a couple of points more than those featuring newer/younger couples. Using the fake reunion as an example to show that J/J are not ratings pullers is ludicrous. Storylines that don't respect Matt and Missy's talent will turn viewers off almost as surely as them being off-screen. Does the fact that John/Kate's sex drew one of the lowest ratings of the year imply that J/M don't pull in ratings? Of course not.

Do I know FOR A FACT that better writing will improve the ratings? No. However, the last time Days had good writing (2002), they performed pretty strongly. When Cwickly/Brash were in charge, Days rarely dropped out of the top 3 or 4. Secondly, the converse clearly applies. When Soap Central did their survey of the industry last year, the number one reason repeatedly cited by fans for tuning out was "the writing".

Rick: ITA with you. Soaps cannot go wrong with the veterans. IMO, Days has really lost out by not having Susan Hayes on the frontburner. She is an awesome actress and Julie is a wonderful character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Evan, thanks for not going ballistic because I dont always agree with ya. ;) However, I do agree with you if Jack was written like he used to be and take a turn back to the evil side then maybe more viewers would be interested in J/J again. He should be pissed all to hell for what has happen to him that last 3 years. I would love to see Jack try and get revenge and turn back to his evil side again, I know Matt could definitely pull it off. As of now or the last 3 years its the same stuff OVER and OVER with J/J, they need a different story for once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Another great episode.  GH has been pretty good this year, loading up the chamber, because now there's many bullets to fire, and another one was fired today when Nina found out Michael is the father of Sasha's baby.  I hope this secret comes out at the hearing.  I've also liked the slow burn with Gio/Emma. There's just so many things to look forward to on this show now.  GH is finally back to being really good. 
    • I'm all for it. Get them Nina!   

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I am blown away that Christie Clark is 51, and she debuted 39 years ago. They gave her a lovely script today.  But, I could not think of any other examples in culture of someone able to jump right back into the skin of a character, after virtually retiring from acting years ago. I was trying to recall if Carrie left for a bit with Anna after Roman died (because she wasn't at Bo & Hope's wedding), and then returned as a pre-teen Christie?  Or if she was just SORASed off-screen?  But, whenever I see the character I am reminded how much more trauma she's endured than Sami, and yet she remains such a nice person.
    • Weirdly I feel like Nina was the most sus about the entire situation.  Normally I would have given this one to Carly, but Nina was always kind of trying to make it make sense. I think Nina (and Alexis) are actually really smart characters.  They just constantly get in their own way with dumb plans lol.
    • Rewatching some of 1991 I had to appreciate what a strong week March 5-12 1991 was. Cassandra dies, Nina shoots David, Sheila switces the babies, and drunk Nikki all occurring simultaneously. 1991 and 92 were pretty strong overall.
    • Still loving all the Gio fallout, but the scenes that really surprised me this episode were the ones with Nina and Maxie. I was not expecting Nina to be the one to put together all the pieces about Sasha's baby daddy. This custody hearing is about to get explosive!
    • I really hope after the secret comes out their interactions don't stop
    • BAHAHA  I needed that laugh today. Talk about one note.  I would put Derek and Ashley a notch above Dani. Dani's scenes are basically rinse, lather, and repeat for 60 episodes and counting.  It's as if she was transported from the soap opera Passions onto this soap.  MVJ should put aside her friendship/admiration for Karla and look at the fact that this character isn't wroking as written.
    • Agreed.  It doesn't feel in character at all.
    • You could always tell whenever Douglas Marland enjoyed writing for a particular actor, because he'd pull out all the stops for them; and Julianne Moore was no exception.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy