Jump to content

AMC: Confirmed


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Just in case there was any doubt (and I have no idea why there was any doubt in the first place) SOD confirms what pretty much everyone figured out EIGHT MONTHS ago: Josh is the FETUS. He was not created from stolen eggs. He is Jeff Martin and Erica Kane's son.

McTavish took Agnes Nixon's ground-breaking story and sh*t on it for a stupid ratings-grabber that won't work because nobody is going to be surprised unless they've been living under a rock, and most viewers don't give a damn about Josh and Greg.

I'm surprised to see what the hardcore AMC supporters/ "McTavish is the Messiah" fans have to say about this. A while ago even they were against this move, but I have a feeling that tune will change.

So McT got what she wanted: Now her name will be associated with the abortion forever, having put her own stupid twist on it. Good for you McTavish. I'm furious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

.....................This has been turned into a McTravesty. I think Agnes should pitch a fit to ABC and demand they don't do this. That abortion storyline, though controversial, is a ground breaking story and an important part of AMC's history. I would expect this from JFP & GaP, but not McTavish. Congratulations Megan, you've turned this into a McTravesty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

AAAHH!!! :mellow:

So basically it's like saying Erica didn't have the first legal abortion on television. It’s erasing that history. It makes it all false.

I hope a bunch of people write to ABC and complain about this! Hopefully Agnes will step in and change the McT's story plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I held out hope that it wouldn't be this but this is an awful move by McTavish, one of her worst. I guess it is true that Agnes virtually has no influence over her baby anymore :( This is just awful. And I wonder how the great Susan Lucci feels about this.... she was part of the first legal abortion on TV....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yikes!

I really had no idea that she would actually go through with this. This is very stupid. You should never mess with a storyline that’s historic.

I guess Megan wanted to cement herself as AMC’s most infamous writer (as if that wasn’t already the case) -- and this will definitely do it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lucci should refuse to play the storyline on principle. What are they gonna do, fire her?! I don't think so! Its not unprofessional because she is just protecting the legacy of her character and the show. She should put her foot down like Geary does over on GH.

This is the most despicable plot driven storyline of all time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's shocking and wrong and horrible at first, but last night, I really thought about it for the first time...

When this happens, Josh is going to be Erica's son and Jeff's son. Now whether or not we get some good Josh/Martins scenes, that's still up for debate, BUT, if we do, and they turn out to be amazing, I could probably, slowly, begin to accept the rewrite. Look at it this way: if Erica's abortion was just another throwaway daytime abortion, I doubt anyone would have a problem with it. It'd be a great way to link the show's past to its present.

BUT, the abortion being the legendary event that it was, this definitely stains the whole thing quite a bit. BUT, does it in anyway affect the importance and affect it had on audiences back in 1973? It was still the first legal abortion on daytime TV, but now we know that it didn't really happen. It was thought to be the first legal abortion, but it really wasn't.

I know that most of this will fall on deaf ears, but that's fine. I'll choose to feel my own way about the whole situation. I'm going to look on the bright side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL SORASING makes thinking about timelines MIND BOGGLING. there is no use in doing it. I had a thought (as did others on a message board), if you read between the lines of spoilers Tad goes to Erica with this news but Greg is still trying desperately to hold onto his secret... the theory is Tad gets a positve match on Josh's blood to erica and he thinks well he is the aborted fetus, but what if he isn't? What if Tad tells Erica this and that is the assumed case and it comes out later that it was something completely different. Now this could just be wishful thinking but until I see it on my screen I will be wishful lol because this is gonna make me gag if this is the actual end result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't watch AMC but as an outsider I can tell this is a stupid move.

Detractors of modern daytime soaps slam them for being throwaway, melodramatic trash. Now one of the occasions where the show did something socially relevant and groundbreaking (as Agnes Nixon intended her shows to do) is tossed aside for a dumb airport novel style plot twist.

Where is the integrity?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I’ve reached the summer of 1998.  Until now, my impression has been that the show has steadily improved since the great quality dip of 1994, reaching as high as 8/10 in 1997. Sure, I could complain about a few things in 1997 (Claudia got wasted after her initial storyline; Thorne’s feelings for Taylor were a bit too sudden; the storyline where Sheila lived with James and Maggie while pregnant got rather boring; Mike periodically revisiting Sheila despite being on the run from authorities), but overall it was a very strong year.  I liked the Thorne/Taylor/Ridge triangle, the mystery plot about who shot Grant, the sham wedding to trap Sheila, Stephanie/Eric/Lauren, and Clarke manipulating his way back to working at Forrester. I even liked the Greenland storyline with Eric/Lauren/Rush, although I had expected to hate it. Maybe 1996 tops 1997 in raw soapy excitement (especially as Sheila got a chance to interact with a larger canvas of characters), but some problems with overall storyline cohesion puts it somewhat below 1997 for me. Unfortunately, 1998 has turned out to be a bit of a speedbump, perhaps on par with 1995 levels of quality: - Maggie’s character really got trashed after James left her to be with Sheila, and the early 1998 storylines where she imprisoned Sheila in the house from Psycho, or installed those wires and mikes and such in her house to make her think she’s going crazy, were total GARBAGE. So much so that the latter storyline (and Maggie with it) pretty much disappeared into a limbo.  - I have mixed feelings about the twins plotline with Lauren. No way did Rush survive being shot with a crossbow through the chest, and the romance between Lauren and Rush’s good twin brother Johnny was rather dry to me. I did however enjoy the camp aspect of Rush taking his brother’s place to be with Lauren, and Eric rescuing her. But it doesn’t appear like Bell cared too much about the Johnny/Lauren romance beyond the twin storyline gimmick, and it too disappeared in an unsatisfactory manner (come on, why not hire Johnny’s actor for just 5 more episodes for an arc where he realizes Lauren is not over Eric, or JUST SOMETHING?) - Clarke wormed his way back to FC in late 1997, which had exciting storytelling potential, but then he disappeared almost entirely. Sad to see my favorite character wasted in this manner. Does he get anything interesting to do between now and the Morgan saga of 2000-2001? - The Thomas saga was entertaining in 1997, but it got stretched out too much, and made some of early 1998 tiresome, with Ridge having to decide YET AGAIN which woman he wants to be with. On the plus side, I like the plotline of Thorne being neighbors with Macy and Grant, and we’ve finally been introduced to the SORASed Rick/Amber/CJ crowd. The Stephanie/James/Sheila triangle is also starting, and it makes me excited (I remember seeing some if it in my childhood). I know Sheila, Grant, and James are all leaving soon, which I honestly kind of dread - between them and Clarke’s near-absence, it feels like herd is going to get culled too much in the near future. But I know there’s the familiar 1999-2002 to look forward to.
    • LOL - this is a perfect description, and that's what I loved about it! May be a bit campy, but it immediately caught my attention in a good way.  I'm not familiar with the Fishing Trip storyline, I'll have to look that up. I've noticed that about Josh, which has made him less attractive to me overall. He just yells a lot when he's not happy. Wow, Reva was married to HB!  LOL - "Always... eventually, and again"
    • I love your ideas. I would love to see Jack grown up this confused unhinged individual. He should hold a grudge against both Brooke and Taylor.   
    • @chrisml

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Lois's return has been a bust. So disappointing that the writers have never written for her. As with Tracy, the pool of GH vets is so thin, there's no one to pair her with. Doubtful they would go to the trouble of properly recasting a legacy character and then sticking  him with Lois; they're obviously not that invested. If she wants to be on this show, it'll be as a noisy grandma who stays in the background. 
    • I love me some Anita and TT. They need to give her a good storyline and I know that it's coming. 
    • @Franko Thanks for tagging me. A few days ago I was talking in another thread about the rise of "snarky" critics for TV shows in the '90s online recaps, but this is just more along the lines of a mauling. There's also the unspoken reality that films like Steel Magnolias were seen as movies for women, so therefore they sucked. Pauline Kael also had her share of blunt, at times incredibly nasty remarks, but the vitriol is often balanced by her love for film. I'm not seeing that here.  With that said, the comment about Field's work becoming unbearable describes how I felt when I tried to sit through her and Maura Tierney on ER. 
    • I skipped most of Daniel too. I think it's awful he has kids with Nicole, Csrky5 and Chloe and Brady, Bo and Philip do not. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • A great day. Feeling happy and accomplished.

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy