Jump to content

Andrew Breitbard Is Dead


VirginiaHamilton

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I strongly disagree.

After spending over 15 years using the media as a tool to spread his bigoted brand of vitriol, he is simply getting it back in spades.

If some are worried that their demises will be received the same way, then they ought to take a hard look at themselves and reevaluate whether the hate speech and hateful behavior that they put out there is worth it in the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I had to Google this Andrew Breitbard character, fortunately his brand of bollocks never made its way to London, Vancouver or even Los Angeles, apparently.

He sounds like a person who was filled with anger and hate. That isn't ever good for someone with heart problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

While Kennedy was the biggest piece of s#it in modern political history, there was no excuse for Brietbart to show such vitriol to the late senator so soon after his death. (If somebody whom you hate dies, the classy thing to do is to stay silent for a while, and then--a few months later--go about criticizing that person. I would never advocate for somebody to say great things about that person, because that would be totally insincere.)

I fully expected Hannity to give a gushing tribute to Brietbart last night. What shocked me, however, is that liberal darling Arianna Huffington appeared on Piers Morgan's show to talk about what a wonderful man he was. I wonder how folks here feel about Huffington now that she did that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm perplexed at the idea of Arianna Huffington being a "liberal darling." She was a strong Republican voice for many years, only leaving the party about ten or so years ago. She has since had a website which goes anywhere the wind blows, mostly in a tabloid manner, and recently merged with AOL, not exactly known for a hogwild liberal worldview.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

*Takes off soap junkie hat and puts on political junkie hat*

He was a conservative commentator who had a website called BigGovernment.com, and he was known to say some particularly outrageous things (putting it mildly). He in particularly sparked controversy with this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resignation_of_Shirley_Sherrod

I took issue with a lot of what he said given I'm a pretty liberal Democrat, but I still have sympathy for his family.

Oddly enough, as someone mentioned earlier, Alley Mills was in fact his stepmother-in-law, as he was married to the daugther of her husband, comedian Orson Bean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know Passions used this trope with Ethan and Sam to drag out the paternity, but GH seems to speed through certain stories while dragging others.
    • For any other soap, I think I’d agree, but GH, I don’t know

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Agreed, that there was some strange choices in the episode, especially at the end, but overall, that was some great drama that opens up the potential for so much future storyline. Kat vs. Eva having the most potential, especially over Tomas. I have mixed feelings about Martin/BC though. I thought he did pretty well in scenes with Smitty/MM, but the scenes of him confronting Leslie and of him throwing the books were bad lol she acted circles around him.  It’s similar to what Harding Lemay said about George Reinholt at AW; he could be brilliant in one scene, but then mediocre in the next. 
    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
    • And of course Mama Ru herself appeared on All My Children.
    • The Saturday 8pm slot usually had the lowest rating of the NBC 4 sitcom lineup for some reason. NBC let Saturday night fizzle, They used 9.30 pm to launch 227 and Amen, both of which moved to earlier in the evening but they  kept Empty Nest following GG for several seasons.  Empty Nest should have moved to 8pm with their strongest new sitcom at 9.30, anticipating that GG would eventually falter. Instead they left them there and stretching the sitcom pool too thinly on other nights. When Grand talk over at 9.30 Thurs maybe Night Court and Wings could have been used on Saturday.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy