Jump to content

CBS News Is "Building You a Better Morning"


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Has anybody seen those ads that say "Please pardon our appearance. CBS News Is Building You a Better Morning."? I personally think that CBS's latest attempt to remake its morning show is f*cking absurd. After all, it was only twelve years ago when the network dumped tons of money into The Early Show.

IMO, the only good morning team CBS has ever had was Harry Smith and Paula Zahn. I have no idea what CBS's latest attempt involves, but I sure as hell hope the definition of a "better morning" doesn't include Julie Chen.

Les Moonface was brutally honest when he stated that GL's and ATWT's time was over. What really pisses me off, though, is that he can't concede that CBS's "day is done" when it comes to being a relevant player in the morning. In all seriousness, reruns of popular CBS primetime shows would likely get higher ratings if they aired from 7:00 A.M. to 9:00 A.M. (and would almost certainly be more profitable). But whereas network executives love to piss on soap fans, they seem to have little problem promoting other programs that are destined to fail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Nothing against Gayle King, as I like her, but has she ever had any success in a national format?

It's time for CBS to just give up. Their morning shows have almost always failed and usually their attempts to fix them just make them worse, as you can see with this latest revamp.

They were so eager to kill off Captain Kangaroo because then they could have their own Today/GMA. 30 years later and it's still sh!t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

CBS could not move "Morning Joe" to its network, as the show is most likely owned by MSNBC, which would require that network's consent - which it was unlikely to give.

CBS has, however, done the next best thing...they will attempt to copy "Morning Joe" with their revamped "CBS This Morning". In addition to Gayle King and Charlie Rose, Erica Hill will be brought over from the concluding "Early Show". Reportedly, Hill and Rose will co-anchor the 7:00 hour and Hill and King will take over at the 8:00 hour.

The man in charge of "CBS This Morning" is none other than Chris Licht, who was also the producer of MSNBC's "Morning Joe".

As for as disparaging CBS for trying to improve their morning show, viewing habits do not change quickly when it comes to news. NBC's primetime woes may finally be affecting their news divisions, as both the "Nightly News" with Brian Williams, "Meet the Press" on Sunday mornings and "Today" are all seeing their ratings decline, while ABC is slowly creeping up (with the exception of Sunday morning's "This Week", which is actually losing viewers as well). The new "CBS This Morning" may be just the thing that CBS needs to jump start its morning...something different and not interchangeable with ABC or NBC's morning programs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In theory, a hard news morning show sounds like a good idea (as so many are sick of the worthless fluff that hogs up the air time on Today and GMA). And as you stated, viewing habits are slow to change. However, CBS has been irrelevant in the morning for so long (even when it was the top rated network) that any attempt to remake its image just seems futile. (Unlike with soaps, however, no network executive is ready to concede reality and try alternative programming from 7:00 to 9:00.) Furthermore, I would have a much better feeling about this show if Charlie Rose was on it for the full two hours; anything that involves Gayle King cannot credibly be passed off as hard news. Also, Mr. Chen has a poor record when trying to remake a dying CBS news program into something relevant: witness his idea to put Katie Couric into the anchor chair.

By the way, I think the declines in the NBC shows have less to do with the network's sagging primetime fortunes and more to do with the fact that Brian Williams, David Gregory, and Ann Curry are so boring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Members

I agree if they are looking for demos, this is not the way to go. Perhaps they have given up on the younger audience as they realize most won't be up that early in the morning. The people who are home and awake when these morning shows perhaps are older and retired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
    • Good morning, boys!  I figured that it was time that our Gio was introduced into the hotness thread

      Please register in order to view this content

      @ranger1rg I even included a close up of his face for ya!
    • Under all of Madonna's social media today there is this wave of negative, toxic, absurd comments by Lady Gaga fans telling her how Gaga surpassed her in concert in Copacabana. I mean... Who the hell cares? Why are these fan communities so freaking toxic??? I'm sure Madonna doesn't care... But still. Have some respect for M. Leave her social media alone. Go cheer Gaga and be happy. Why come and spew hate on M??? Crazy world.
    • FYI, again, Ruth/Letitia is not in either of these 2 episodes. So that concludes the 4 episodes I had from Nov. 1983. I don't have the October episodes.
    • Eddie has begun uploading the 1990 episodes. I'm so happy about that. I was mindfully taking a break till there's plenty of episodes I can binge watch when I feel like it. Now that 1989 is complete... I can't wait to press play on February 1989 and resume where I left off.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Me when someone asks me to be proper and demure. 
    • This is just a guess but I feel like the fact that they keep mentioning her dead husband is for a reason. We know Martin has a secret that likely involved someone dying. Martin's victim could be Alan which Leslie/Dana either knows about or finds out and she uses that to blackmail the family into letting her crimes slide.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy