Jump to content

Joan Collins on Fat People, Asians, Reagan love, and Warren Beatty, etc


EricMontreal22

Recommended Posts

  • Members

But she wouldn't say it because "still" implies it was an acceptable and commonplace word at some point prior, and it never was. Chinaman was actually word people used without ever thinking they were saying any sort of ethnic slur. You are saying that if she said "oriental" instead of "Asian" it is the exact same thing as if she said "gook" or "chink". Some words were offensive and slurs from day one, and some words are just outdated and it took a long time for people to realize they were saying things that offended.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yeah, I think chinaman was in the same category as negress, Jewess and the like that just land wrong on our ears now. I do however think it's absurd to call someone who isn't even Chinese a chinaman. There was this older gentleman who used to live around my way who I ran into a few times walking his two Pekinese. I heard him charmingly say to other people he'd greet with dogs, "Has your fella there ever met a chinaman?" It's just not something that dawns on people of a certain age. However. Joan is cosmopolitan enough to update her vocab. She's just sort of digging her heels into the ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I see what you're saying, but I think she is doing it deliberately. She has to know that she's going to offend people, and she doesn't care. In some instances that's great, and more power to you. But in some instances you come off as overbearing and bitchy.

Even still, her comments about overweight people are still disgusting and ignorant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She's been pregnant three times and lost the baby weight three times. As well, your point about her never being overweight herself proves her point: she knows plenty about how to stay slim and healthy. There is no excuse for being overweight aside from thyroid problems (which are corrected with medication) and complete physical immobility. It's harsh but true, if you're overweight you really are digging your own grave with your teeth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know, my best friend is really obese... when we were 21, he had a beautiful body... and now he looks like a woman who's 7 months pregnant, and i'm not exaggerating... top that off with he started smoking when he was 25, and he now smokes 1 1/2 packs a day and drinks a half gallon of Dr. Pepper a day instead of water, talk about disaster waiting to happen. and it pisses me off, because he has a high metabolism, and all he would need to do is drop the Dr. Pepper, and most of that weight would fall right off. When I was 175 pounds, I had to eat 1,200 calories a day to maintain that. and I worked in a garden center lifting and moving bushes all day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is VERY true--good point. I have a friend who actually met her at a political party in the UK a number of years back, and asked why she was supporting the candidate (and I don't remember who it was or even for what party) and she basically stated all personal reasons--she liked him, thought he presented himself well, they ahd been friends, etc. As my friend said, she seemed completely clueless, and not to even remotely care, about the actual politics he was behind.

Which hardly sounds like a good thing, but I can in a way appreciate. Well maybe appreciate is too strong a term, but I can understand. She hasn't gone out publicly speaking out FOR any of their policies or acted like she should be trusted for her political views. And as backhanded a complement as this is, I don't think most of her fans, particularly her gay fans, take her point of view on things seriously anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Chinaman comment annoys me particularly because I have two British friends who are all pro gay rights, etc, but see a HUGE Asian threat coming into the UK. But instead of trying to explain rationally that maybe they're put off by so many immigrants, or whatever (and I know it's a big issue in the UK--though one I can't comment on), they positively relish, much like Joan seems to, in calling all of them Chinamen (and they're MY AGE)--saying there's no difference if they come from Korea, Japan, whatever, they're all from the orient and chinamen. I think it is an offensive, and dangerous, attitude, and Joan is a woman of the world and so I'm not sure age is a good defence for her. It's not like my now gone Grandma sitting in her home decrying the chinamen. How would people react if she publicly said the same thing about all her faggot friends? (And yes, I do think it's the same). It's just a bit disappointing, and I think it does somewhat set a precedent for people to find it amusing that she says it and say it too (and no, I don't think Joan owes it to anyone to be a role model, but...).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

...and chinamen--but yes, I completely agree. It's not about being politically correct (it's horrible how many times people complain about being judged because they're not politically correct). I'm very liberal, but I do think political correctness went way too far--but there's still such a thing about being sensitive, and context. Chinaman may not be quite as offensive, for various reasons, as calling black people the N word, but I doubt Joan would proudly brag about calling D Carroll when they were on Dynasty a Negress...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They probably would be fine with her saying homo, and particularly queer which have sorta become ironic terms many gays use themselves, as I said, fag, would be a totally different issue. I agree with you--and your following point. The thing is, nobody said she should admire overweight people--or Asians, why should she admire people because of one aspect of themselves? But... It would be completely different if she had said all this in a FunnyOrDie skit mocking herself, or something, which maybe she should have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's really not true. It's not as bad as saying (pardon me) chink, but it is seen as derogatory--I'd say at least on the level of queer, which as I said, has been largely re appropriated. It's not as bad as the fag, but it's insulting nonetheless and condescending--and I do think to act indignant that she should try to not use the word makes little sense.

From the gay perspective I think it was more about gay issues--Reagan's crap handling of AIDS is one thing, but the damage and laws passed under Thatcher against gays really are, in hindsight, pretty shocking.

I do agree with this--obviously the reaction is to how she said it (and I do find it odd, again, that she feels she was asked to admire them). If asked about anorexia would she make the same comment the same way? Actually, maybe she would...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oriental is bad, but I think chinaman is seen as worse. Regardless, I disagree there--I think homo became a word you weren'tmeant to say AFTER the word chinaman. Of course Joan has probably worked and known many more gay men than she has Asians, so maybe that's a part of the ignorance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I've seen it posted elsewhere people saying "Veronica" should be on this show. My response is always going to be hell no.  You're definitely right about these characters catching on with the audience. Everyone has their favorite. I was pleasantly surprised people have some for Doug. 
    • If the show was interested in tying in one of the three prime time specials in the 90s, the smarter choice probably would have been Night Sins from 1993. Night Sins was the ushering in of Titan Publishing, the first mentions of Kate Roberts coming in to run it, plus it had involved Jack retyping a manuscript he had found in the new house he and Jen moved into... which ended up being a thinly veiled story written by Kate about her dalliance with Bill Horton that produced Lucas. However, I doubt the writers were even thinking about the prime time episodes when deciding to name the manuscript One Stormy Night.  I also don't see Stephanie being the one that would be writing it.  The current actress playing Stephanie seems to play a more passive version of Stephanie vs the previous takes by Shayna and Shelley..imho. Javi is cute... much too good for Leo.  He can do so much better.
    • I might've gone after someone like Jed Allan, or even Donald May. Though they're very different.
    • Same.   Looking forward to seeing what I missed later. And God bless him for coming back!!! I was so happy to see him again! But...will he be for Dani...or Nicole? Hmm
    • Question for all: Who would have made a good Mike recast after Stewart departed?
    • I think they did. Again, it is not an either/or proposition for most of the audience so far. Most don't feel the need to stan one or reject the other.
    • KKL on Bold Live on May 1st. Details here  
    • I do wonder if the show realized that fans would take to Silk Press and Eva as much as we have?    To me, I think the core four was mostly used to get eyes on the show since all four were familiar performers in both daytime and primetime.   Of the four, I think Nicole is used most effectively where it doesn't look as though she's hogging airtime.  She works as a lead and as a talk to. Anita has been the most under utilized of the four, but I do have a feeling that might be changing once the Ted/Nicole/Eva/Silk Press Story goes back to support status. Of the four, I think Dani has been over-used.. but I do still see potential for the character.  I know some people think she's the modern day Erica Kane, but I don't see that.  Erica was a Have Not that became a Have while Dani is a Have by birth and has done nothing to have earned being a Have. Good cliffhanger.
    • LOL now this sells it for me!  I can't wait to watch later tonight!
    • I think this is a great observation.  I do wonder if some of that was down to how Nixon had started writing story and plot outlines.  By this point (maybe even by the mid 70s) many have discussed how she *didn't* write detailed story outlines anymore--the focus more was on a mood or theme and ABC simply allowed that because they trusted her at this stage (in her "memoir" I think even Megan McTavish talks about Nixon's writing in this way in the 90s and she basically seems to admit that it worked for Nixon.  But if Nixon wasn't in charge of the daily execution of these ideas...) What was with the ABC soaps around that time bringing in Aussie "hunks" from Heartbreak High?  Richard (Corey Paige?) Tanner on AMC (Vince Poletto) OK not from Heartbreak High but didn't Ingo Rademacher start on GH around this same time?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy