Jump to content

GH: Classic Thread


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Members

It’s amazing to remember that Monica (and ultimately Gail too) came from that disaster. Different actress than LC at first, but still. I am glad I was old enough to at least see Jessie from time to time, and know characters like Lee, Steve, Audrey, etc.

I have read recaps and plot summaries for that period of time and it reads dreadfully. Marland and Monty’s 1978 is interesting even as a summary, their new characters much more dynamic. The original Pollock stuff with the Webbers is just awful.

Putting Rick with Lesley, Monica with Alan, and Jeff with Heather (and making him Steve’s son) at least made their stories more entertaining. Jeff is insufferable most of the time though from what I have seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Yes, Monica and Gail, not to mention Heather made it to Marland's tenure.  I remember liking Cher's sister in the Heather role, but very little footage of her exists.  The actress playing Alice Grant#1 was good, but she looked more like Heather's grandmother than her mother.

I recall too, that around this time, someone tried to update Emily McLaughlin's hairstyle, framing her face with flipped up curls. My mother groaned, "I don't like Jessie's hair.  She used to look nice!"  I have seen a picture with Emily McLaughlin and John Beradino in character with a chart used as a prop, where Jessie has the "offending" hairstyle.

Another memory was the abrupt change dropping the organ music.  Yes it was cheesy at times, and sooner or later, it had to go, but my family missed it once it was gone.  Our favorite organ cue was the gong sound effect when a character was making a shocking discovery.

All these small memories show how seemingly details mattered to loyal viewers.  They are nice memories.  I won't burden the good readers here with too many more.  Thank you for letting me share.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree - and by all means, please feel free to share any more memories from that period that you feel comfortable sharing with us.  So much of GH pre-Marland is not otherwise known to those who weren't alive to see it (myself included).  Any info. on that time would be greatly appreciated!

I'm not surprised.  I've yet to find anything positive about the Pollocks' work on any show, including THE DOCTORS and DYNASTY.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ABC did have a soap in development at that time Ann Marcus' The Best Years so maybe that was their back up if GH continued to fail.

The fact they were willing to pour money into GH showed they knew it was better to try and revive a known show than launch a new one.

I imagine the 13 week aspect is they wanted to see some ratings improvement in that time or cancellation was on the horizon. They would have needed months to get a replacement on air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My question is, how long was GH in trouble for ABCD to give Gloria Monty such an ultimatum?  Had GH been struggling for years at the network, or were they just being impatient?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@Khan Check out the Ratings from the 70's thread. Jason is currently posted 1976 data and although ratings fluctuate GH is beaten by EON on occasion and sometimes ranks as ABC's lowest rating soap.

I think creatively it was in worse shape than OLTL  even though ratings were similar. I've never seen mention of OLTL facing the axe so I guess there were other BTS factors that threatened GH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm tempted to say that what gave OLTL the edge was that it was Agnes Nixon's creation.  But, on the other hand, Nixon had long ago sold the show to the network and moved full-time to AMC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

From stuff I have read about those times, it seems ABC was also kind of embarrassed by how bad the show had become compared to what it had been. AMC and OLTL, while dated compared to today in aesthetics, were both considered modern for the times, including more complex characters. GH was kind of old fashioned in a way the network didn’t want to maintain.

if the history can be trusted (which we know is hit or miss), the switch to 45 minutes caused the flood of new stories/characters, which helped destabilize the ratings. Monty arrived just as they were going to an hour, and they didn’t want any more losses like they had at 45 on top of just wanting the show to be better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Judging from the smattering of pre-Monty material that's currently available on YT, I kind of see ABCD's point.  The sets and wardrobe seem terribly cheap compared to, say, DAYS or Y&R from that same period. 

IIRC, GH's opening sequence before the familiar one (of the ambulance driving past the hospital) was just the words "GENERAL HOSPITAL" against a blue or black screen.  In that respect, they might have been ahead of their time, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would assume that it was probably around late 1974 that the network became dissatisfied, because by 1975, they axed Jim Young as the producer and replaced him with Tom Donovan, who was probably the worst producer GH ever had.

Edited by victorlord75
Incomplete
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I guess RTPP looked worse because it followed Another World, but it's a shame they didn't give it more time especially considering how the shows that were put on following it fared.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Durkin was awful. The writing did her no favors, but she was all wrong for the part, lacking the mix of mystery, steeliness, sorrow and hesitancy that defined Victoria. I still have the awful memory of Adam lugging her around like a rag doll. She looked much more like one of the Blue Whale dancing extras than Victoria. And her voice... Maybe I am too harsh. With that said, Curtis didn't seem as bothered. I see from a fan review mentioning Barnabas & Company that Durkin was asked to return for Victoria's final episodes and declined as she had a Christmas trip to Europe with her husband planned and wasn't interested in just a few appearances.  I refuse to believe Victoria actually died during the Leviathan storyline. If Barnabas and Angelique could come back 8 times, she could come back a few.
    • It's a shame she only appeared in three episodes for the purpose of being written out - I thought she was quite good in the little we saw. I liked her vibe better than Durkin that never seemed to quite capture Victoria as a character.
    • He did a lot of romance novel covers, so that might've just been enough for them to get their panties in a twist.
    • Pre-TGIF, ABC most successful 1980s Friday 8 pm comedy I'd say was Webster. Full House wasn't a hit its first two seasons but it started showing growth in its third season which overlapped with the launch of TGIF. Funny thing is, Full House became a Top 10 show with the 1991/92 move to Tuesday.
    • Oakland Tribune, 14 July 1985   AW is another show with Schenkel at helm By Connie Passalacqua For the most part, dictators of South American banana republics enjoy better reputations than executive producers of daytime soap operas. Total authority is vested in these producers, who can kill off a character (thus firing an actor) with a stroke of a pen, or completely change life in his or her soap opera dominion (both in its fictional locale and backstage at the studio) on any kind of whim.  Most rule despotically, inspiring fear in their actors and writers. Which inevitably surfaces on the screen and subtracts from a show's quality. Then there's Stephen Schenkel who became executive producer of Another World last fall. He's been described by one of his actresses as "a teddy bear." He has noticeably improved the show, mostly because his natural warmth encourages backstage cohesiveness, and he believes in personally nurturing his staff and cast. 'I like to be supportive', he said.' I like to generate a certain amount of enthusiasm. I love actors and writers and technical people. And I like to laugh..  ' Schenkel said that most of the factors that have led to the shows improved ratings existed before he took over. There were well defined characters, outstanding writers and excellent production values, he explains. 'These things were in place but needed to be stimulated. There wasn't a lot of excitement. What really was missing was an adequate story. We added Gillian Spencer as a writer. (she also plays Daisy on All My Children), who's wonderful, and it just coalesced. The writers energy and commitment to the show began to give it an emotional intensity and some real passion within the characters." Schenkel, a former ABC programming executive who helped develop Ryan's Hope, is a strong believer in stressing romantic and comedy elements in soap operas. AW is also one of the only soaps with an established group of comic characters, including Wallingford (Brent Collins) and Lily Mason (Jackee , Harry). Schenkel raves about the talents of all his actors, and even has something good to say about the Brooklyn location of the shows studio, which most of his Manhattan-oriented staff loathe. I like the people here. I like to walk down the street and feel their energies, he said. He also violateda soap opera no-no, ' inviting actors and writers to the same party. "Everyone got to know one another, he said. And I didn't get any complaints about actors ' begging for story lines, he said. 
    • Since it's pride month.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • National City Star-News, 5 May 1977 TV topics by Peter Blazi Lear’s ‘All that Glitters’—doesn’t The best thing that can be said about Norman Lear’s newest soap opera“All That Glitters” is that it comes on so late at night most people will miss it. Role reversal is supposed to be the big draw, with women the breadwinners, mainly executives of a huge conglomerate. The men either fuss with the housework or fidget at the office as secretaries to their bawdy bosses. A female fantasyland? I doubt it. While the role reversal idea has some possibilities, the show pushes too hard for laughs and winds up with raucous females and effete males. A confident, independent woman is indeed a sight to behold and attract, but femininity need not be sacrificed. Unlike Lear’s “Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman,” "Glitters” doesn’t, but you’ve got to give him credit for trying. Today’s experimental comedy is what tomorrow’s hits are made of. Better luck next time, Norman. (“All That Glitters” can be seen weekday evenings at 11 p.m. on Channel 6.) .
    • Actually Kim Zimmer got six weeks off to test the waters for pilot season in L.A. - she said later she went on many auditions and got one offer for a sitcom, but she would one of many in an ensemble. She turned it down, because it wasn't worth leaving Guiding Light for a supporting role on a sitcom. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy