Jump to content

AMC Tribute Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

She did appear a number of times, yes.

Carla was older and not quite as popular as Angie and Jesse, but I do think they could've easily found a role in the LOV firmament for her and Sadie, be it at the hospital or with Carla continuing in law and adding some young relatives for them (or Josh Hall). Would it have been as strong as what Angie, Frankie and Jacob became, probably not, but it would've kept the characters in the ABC audience consciousness for longer. Which, as Debbi and Darnell's time at LOV and TC proved, went a long way down the road. Of course the same can be said for Linda Gottlieb, etc.'s apparent attempts to get Holly to appear on OLTL in '92 or '93 for the 25th anniversary, which she turned down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I didn't know that Ellen Holly had been approached to return for OLTL's 25th.  Or, if I had known, I had forgotten.  That's amazing (...and kind of sad that it didn't happen, although I certainly understand why).

I wonder if Holly and Lillian Hayman might've been more inclined to move over to AMC, since that had a higher profile than LOVING.  AMC had a very large cast at that time, but I think they could've trimmed a few actors from the roster to make room for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She was. She talks about it in her book and very poignantly says she would've felt out of place at some anniversary dinner with a slew of rich costars (some of whom, like Robin and Bob Woods, she still seemed very fond of) while having become a city librarian. Recently someone indicated they also may have tried to get her to appear in summer '92, when Valarie Pettiford's Sheila and Ellen Bethea's Rachel openly discuss colorism and the local legend of Carla in a scene that knocked me over with a feather. (The individual scene is still floating around on YT, though I believe much of that year is now available.)

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Other than the Chicken Shack degradation (which Whitfield didn't really blame on her specifically - he said he was told they just weren't going to have Derek and Mimi marry in a church because they'd already used that set for other recent weddings), I think some fans might say McTavish gave better material to the black characters than what they would get through the rest of the '90s - although I think that may be more down to ABC likely feeling the black canvas could just be replaced by the (sanctimonious and dull as hell) Santos family. 

Still, I think Angie was better served with Loving at the time, at least once her stories got going - I know some fans feel that her story doesn't really pick up until the time she's sick and Janie dies, giving her a transplant. After that she gets steady, good material.

I actually had a dream a few days ago where there was a big special episode, done with a filmic quality, and a premiere, of Angie going to Loving, and Angie and Pat walking out of a big movie theater, etc. 

Maybe somebody can turn that into an AI someday...probably around the time we all get turned into AI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not sure if shared in the past so re-sharing.

The part I enjoyed was their discussion on character and their backstories.  The how and why of a character is vital because it informs how you play and write the character..even if not shown on screen.

Perfect examples of female characters on AMC with the Nixon touch (imho).

1) Erica Kane (Abandonment issues, seeking constant validation, poor social skills with women)

2) Brooke English (Adopted mom hated her, trying to mother teen girls that are lost due to her lack of being given love by a female/motherly figure..plus grief over losing her daughter, always opting for Erica's leftover

3) Gloria Marsh

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know about Mulcahey's involvement, though obviously he was a major part of the small writing team at the start.

However, Loving had a more complicated creation, one I had confirmed 10 or so years back when I had a brief email correspondence with Dan Wakefield while I was researching my Nixon/AMC related MA thesis. 

Dan Wakefield, who passed away just last year, was a well regarded novelist most known for Going All the Way and Starting Over.  He actually also wrote the screenplay decades later for 1997's film of Going All the Way with an amazing cast--that was a big mess but the director's cut released a couple of years back is worth watching.  But I digress.

Wakefield also wrote the 1976 book All Her Children, one of the first books to take soap operas seriously, and as anyone who remembers me on here, a book I champion all the time, which talks about how surprised he was to fall in love and become obsessed with AMC, and then examines soap operas and its fans in general as well as profiling Agnes Nixon.  Around that time Wakefield actually created the show James at 16 (though I think network interference meant he didn't stay with it for its brief run.)

But he remained close with Nixon, and they hatched a plan to create a soap opera together, and he would be the headwriter.  It was his idea to set it on a college campus.  In my emails, Wakefield, who was flattered anyone was interested in this aspect of his career, said he'd look for the outline and mail (!) a copy to me, but our emails petered out and he never seemed to find it.  This was when it was still called Love Without End (which doesn't flow off the tongue but I still think is a better title.)  Anyway, Dan realized just how much work and what a commitment being headwriter would be, and he amiably left the project, and it was, from his understanding, around this point when Nixon contacted Marland (at that stage in her career, Nixon didn't want to actually be a headwriter for a new show, but she did want to oversee it.)  I believe Marland at the time only had cable soap New Day in Eden occupying him and it probably quickly became apparent that it was a non-starter (how I wish I could see more than the 5 minutes of an episode I've seen of that!)

Knowing what we know of Marland I think the basic character/family setup of Loving was his work.  But we now know that the combo never really worked--apparently Nixon insisted on giving plenty of notes on all the early scripts, which wasn't what was expected. etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks for reminding us of the history with Wakefield and Loving, which I always forget. 

I think Agnes' choices start to seep in after some of the initial material, although we have so little available it's hard to say (I'd give her credit for Ava and Kate, at least).

The good news is if you go to the New Day In Eden/Loving Friends and Perfect Couples thread, a full New Day in Eden episode was finally put on Youtube earlier this month. We've gotten so much this month I am now going to feel spoiled for the upcoming drought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Of course it was Douglas Marland. Certainly I knew that. I have no idea why my wayward fingers typed Mulcahey. One of life's lovely OOPS. Thanks.

I was unaware of all of this information & am thoroughly enjoying reading this. And I have & love that book. And, I have read or heard multiple accounts of Agnes's red penciling even the final drafts of scripts written by valued colleagues. Thank you for posting this!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 member




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy