Jump to content

AMC and OLTL Canceled!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

That sounds like astroturf to me. There is nothing "real" on any of these shows, and I've never heard anyone who watches them praise them for being "real." It's entertainment, not daytime verite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Believe it or not, there is some excitement about The Chew by foodies. Not tons of it but on various food blogs and chef sites there's some curiosity. But I doubt anybody is going to ABC to thank the programming geniuses for filling this entertainment (non)void. There's a lot of people on both sides trying to wag the dog here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't understand what the "REAL change" is, though. Real change from what? I can understand a person being frustrated with the crap that has been AMC and OLTL for years, but I don't get how these shows are supposed to satisfy frustrated soap fans. It's like if the quality of iCarly went down the tubes and Nickelodeon replaced it with reruns of Tales of Wells Fargo. I see prepubescent girls everywhere sighing sighs of relief, "Yes! THIS is what we've been wanting all along!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well yeah, that's a given. I know those who follow the food entertainment biz are probably excited to see this, and I do not begrudge them that. It's just the assumption that soap fans are going to be deep into this show that I don't get. Of course there will be people who watch AMC's finale on the 23rd and tune in for the food program whenever it premieres and like it, but eh...it don't much add up to me. But then again, it could be my bitterness (which is fully intact) peeking out today, grasping at anything and everything it can to trash this food program.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't buy it either. I can see that a lot of people are looking forward to this show and I can understand why but I don't believe anyone would say that.

Maybe they think Rebecca Budig has replaced Sabine Sligh as one of the hosts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Some soap fans are psychos.

I think that ABC would be thrilled if the soaps' 18 to 49 women demo give these new shows a chance, but you are right that it isn't the primary audience that they are targeting with these shows. Based on that promo, the Chew is definitely targeted at the white upper middle class housewives with the disposable income to buy more expensive food and time to devote to lifestyle issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Frons does want soap viewers - he just assumes that they are all fat and stupid and will now be happy to learn how to stop being so fat and stupid. Or that's what I got from his comments anyway.

I don't think there will ever be a ton of people who avoided daytime and will now start watching because soaps are gone. Either they still watch daytime in spite of soaps, or they just find these programs elsewhere (and generally The Chew and Revolution can be found elsewhere). If there are then ABC's usual mismanagement will probably make them tune back out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yep. When I said that nobody wants the soap audience, I meant the real soap audience. Older, minority, lower income... Isn't that supposedly who really watches soaps? These shows are like putting new ammo in the same gun in hopes of getting the people they want, not the people they get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My sister is very interested in watching "The Chew". And, quite honestly, I'm a total foodie and watch all kinds of food programming. My

late-husband was a gourmet chef and we watched food programming since it was prominent on PBS stations. You know Justin Wilson, Julia

Child, Jacques Pepin, The Galloping Gourmet, and I love to watch these kinds of shows. I am a Food Network junkie and watch the Cooking

Channel, Top Chef, etc., etc. And, I would be lying if I said I won't watch "The Chew" because I know I'm going to have to check it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know that any of this is true. Given the demographics of the this country and shear number of people at home during the day, there has to be tons of people who don't watch daytime tv, period, and a lot of them obviously refuse to watch soap operas given the demos. I have no idea how many people will watch The Chew and The Revolution, but people watch The View and I think that it is dreck so there is no accounting for what becomes a hit with any segment of the viewing audience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wonder how many of those people are going to have a lot of time or patience for the revolving panel of hosts, most of whom are more known for TV work than for lifestyle or cooking.

I think those fans will be more likely to find somewhere else to go - if Nate Berkus didn't do well outside of Oprah then I'm not sure Carla and Clinton, as likeable as they are, would be any draw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

People watch The View because they want to see ugly fighting and shock value stuff and so on, and people bickering. At least that seemed to be when the ratings went up. Unless Mario and Carla are going to spew insults at each other in split-screen, those viewers may not be interested.

The party line for years has been that no one has time to watch anything in daytime anymore. So I don't know if this program is going to be enough to get that interest back. The ideas on this show are ideas you can find on many TV channels and TV shows already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy