So, I’m watching 1988 right now and I just learned that Alex was conceived on a hay stack in Neil’s stables 

Plus, I gotta admit that these scenes of Jane and Wally together made me feel a little uncomfortable 😂😂

But it also shows how impossible (and ridiculous) it is for everyone to believe that Victor is Alex’s father because at that moment and pretty much the entire time that Angelica was able to get pregnant, Victor was in the hospital recovering from a gunshot wound. 

So, unless Justin now believes that Angelica drugged Victor or something and then climbed on for a ride, it’s not possible for anyone to believe this. 

Edited January 7, 20241 yr by AbcNbc247

20 minutes ago, AbcNbc247 said:

So, I’m watching 1988 right now

Some 1988 episodes still need summaries. Up to writing any??

9 minutes ago, JAS0N47 said:

Some 1988 episodes still need summaries. Up to writing any??

Sounds like fun lol but the YT channel I’m watching doesn’t have any specific dates

42 minutes ago, AbcNbc247 said:

But it also shows how impossible (and ridiculous) it is for everyone to believe that Victor is Alex’s father because at that moment and pretty much the entire time that Angelica was able to get pregnant, Victor was in the hospital recovering from a gunshot wound.

I guess she snuck into his hospital room one night when the nurses were off-duty, lol?

1 minute ago, Khan said:

I guess she snuck into his hospital room one night when the nurses were off-duty, lol?

Like I said, slipped him a drug and then just climbed on 😂😂😂

Twitter/X is throwing a Twitter Blast Thurs. 1-11 to try to get them to bring back Bope!

All are invited to join in. 

 

 

These deluded folk think that they can get Bo and Hope back because they really, really want that.

 

6 hours ago, AbcNbc247 said:

Sounds like fun lol but the YT channel I’m watching doesn’t have any specific dates

The episode guide is here, so you could probably figure it out. Are they full 45 minute episodes or just random clips from episodes? 

https://daytimeroyaltyonline.com/days-daily-summaries-1980-1989-t15361-s660.html

32 minutes ago, Paul Raven said:

These deluded folk think that they can get Bo and Hope back because they really, really want that.

 

I think that is offensive. I believe they happen to have some measure of faith in fan campaigns, still. You're really jumping to a conclusion to call names this way. 

Definition of deluded

adjective. entertaining a false belief or opinion; mistaken or deceived in mind or judgment:

My comment stands.

16 minutes ago, Donna L. Bridges said:

I think that is offensive. I believe they happen to have some measure of faith in fan campaigns, still. You're really jumping to a conclusion to call names this way. 

It's not offensive. It is an opinion which I happen to agree with. Fan campaigns can work if the show made the decision they are campaigning to reverse. Without going into specifics, there are other reasons Bo and Hope aren't on the show, and it isn't because DAYS doesn't want them.

To be clear, I'm not saying fans can't campaign on something they believe in, but they should at least know the facts behind certain decisions. We can't always blame the show or the network for things.

My opinion of twitter/X campaigns and fan wars is the same as Disney-adults, they are both childish.  A healthy distance is a much more satisfying approach to fandom.  Shows don't need to bend to my sensibility, nor do I need to feel that I shaped the creative effort.  A mature ego respects boundaries and knows that para-social relationships are not a substitute for sharing opinions amongst peers.

And taking opposite opinions personally does not promote an entertaining debate amongst informed adults.

Edited January 8, 20241 yr by j swift

3 hours ago, Errol said:

It's not offensive. It is an opinion which I happen to agree with. Fan campaigns can work if the show made the decision they are campaigning to reverse. Without going into specifics, there are other reasons Bo and Hope aren't on the show, and it isn't because DAYS doesn't want them.

There is no way that from the outside one could know what they do or do not know. That's why I said it was an assumption.

3 hours ago, Paul Raven said:

Definition of deluded

adjective. entertaining a false belief or opinion; mistaken or deceived in mind or judgment:

My comment stands.

Saying that someone is delusional when you don't know anything about what they do or do not know or even intend, to me, smacks of some fans trying to judge other people's fandom. There is a long history of fans communicating to shows about what they want to see. Are we now to think that all of those fans providing feedback have all been suffering under some mental defect? Having delusions is a serious psychological issue. It's not the same as saying you think someone's efforts are misguided. Delusions go hand in hand with hallucinations.

3 hours ago, j swift said:

My opinion of twitter/X campaigns and fan wars is the same as Disney-adults, they are both childish.  A healthy distance is a much more satisfying approach to fandom.  Shows don't need to bend to my sensibility, nor do I need to feel that I shaped the creative effort.  A mature ego respects boundaries and knows that para-social relationships are not a substitute for sharing opinions amongst peers.

And taking opposite opinions personally does not promote an entertaining debate amongst informed adults.

To me fan campaigns have little in common with fan wars. I have no idea what you are talking about "Disney-adults." But I completely disagree that fan campaigns are childish or immature. Fan wars, sure, they are. I do happen to agree with you when it comes to some unusual fan activity when they are trying to take credit for what is actually the show's actions. Now here, I don't understand your point about opposite opinions in debate. In constructive discussion & debate a whole range of opinions can be accounted for.