Jump to content

DAYS: Behind the Scenes, Articles/Photos


DRW50

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I have never gotten Jessica's popularity or Jessica/Josh.  Josh is fine.  First actor is fine.  Second Josh is not nearly as good.  Jessica has always been a drip to me and the DID was just a way to make her more exciting, but she's not.  I don't know if it's Jean Bruce Scott or the writing because on paper Jessica should be an awesome character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It does sound like Days was hoping she would be the young ingenue that would bring in the younger viewers and raise the ratings. But it seems like both the acting and the writing, especially under Nina Laemmle, just wasn't there. And once Pat Falken Smith left, there didn't seem to be much interest in Jessica, and Joshua too anymore.

Edited by AbcNbc247
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I feel like Days tried with her.  She got interesting backstory/parents, a decent love interest, and a lot of story.  It might be all the writing/production shifts, but Jessica/JBS never sparked the way the show was hoping or she should have.  I don't blame them for losing interesting.  Jessica wasn't terribly likable.  And Josh was too old for her lol.  Idk, for some reason I think Donna would have been more interesting in Jessica's stories (outside Alex/Marie as parents).  If I recall from beebs recaps there was another character pre-Jessica that they were setting up to be Marie/Alex's daughter and they dropped her, but instead of recasting they created Jessica and gave her the same personality traits and story lol.  I think it's a combo of all these things that was a failure and it's a shame because she should have carried years of story.  But I also think Melissa should have carried years of story and she did, I guess, but it was mostly unmemorable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The casting of Jessica was a problem.  Jean Bruce Scott came across as dowdy and depressed-more like the lead ingenue's sensible best friend. And she didn't have ingenue long flowing hair!!

And I found Stephen Brooks too old and dour. He should have been more of a troubled teen/early 20's.

In fact when you look at Nina Leammle's characters Joshua/Liz/Kellam/Maxwell/Tod/Leslie -they were mainly over 30-not really ideal when you are trying to jazz up a show that was already crowded with characters in that age group.

Maxwell could have been way younger-an ambitious right hand man to Kellam. Joshua could have also been younger. Tod and Cassie didn't get much of a look in anyway.

And the two younger Horton's who were popular - David and Mike - were immediately marginalized.

Different casting would have had an effect on how the stories played out and how the audience  responded.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Dowdy is the perfect word for Jessica and she was a huge stick in the mud.  It's one thing to be sensible, but it's another to be too scared to have fun.  I don't know why these guys were so into her.  Her mother, the NUN, had more sex appeal lol.  I am sure JBS is a lovely woman, but it was bad casting.  It's telling they never really brought Jessica or Josh back (outside making their son a psycho).

I would agree Stephen Brooks was too old.   I didn't think he was too dour.  I liked him.  Granted, most of the Josh stuff I saw with him was via Marlena edits, but he seemed like a decent, likable guy through all the Kellem rape stuff.  That being said, it looked like the show was going to pair him with Marlena not a teenager so it was a lot easier to like him.

It is a strange choice to bring in a bunch of over 30 characters when trying to revive a soap.  And I am not sure why you bring in Kellam as a villian when you already have a similar villian in Alex.

And if you were trying to do a teen scene I don't know why you get rid of Donna.  Donna is annoying af, but we spent years watching her BS while she was the ONLY teen on the canvas and then you bring more people her age on only to dump her.

David/Mike just seem like they have one bungled storyline after another.  Saddling Mike with a dying wife for so long and David having a kid when Julie was about 35 seems all bad.  It's almost like Days was purposely skewing to an older audience.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I guess it's because the stories on "Hotel" tended to be very...melodramatic, lol?  I mean, it seems like every episode had long-lost lovers reuniting or people finding out someone they knew and/or loved was dying.  And then there was the time Anne Baxter was strung out on dope, lol. Brandon Stoddard must've envied what the other Brandon (Tartikoff) was doing at NBC.
    • Given some of the things that have been said I am going to quote the preface to an analysis I researched & posted about the desired demos when JFP was EP of AW. And, that is more than enough about that, from me.  
    • The thing that I am stuck on is that the in studio scenes in Egypt started airing in mid-October. It seems very strange that they would have planned to have a couple of weeks of studio scenes airing before they started showing location footage. Normally even though some scenes in a remote-infused storyline are in studio, they would start airing a mixture of studio and location footage at the same time. I suspect they had put Arizona in their back pocket well before the Achille Lauro (hence Hawk arriving in September) and possibly moved up the Egypt in-studio action so that the remote Arizona piece unfolded during November. The Achille Lauro may have been the final straw but I would bet it was not the first time they considered the risk. I have found one somewhat contemporaneous reference published on October 19th but pinned to an October 7th* "diary entry" mentioning that the location shoot in Egypt had been changed to Arizona. "International terrorism has its effect on daytime drama, too. Another World producers had scheduled an elaborate and expensive location shoot in Egypt this fall, But with the serious military attacks and hijackings going on, they decided to play it safe. They are going to Arizona instead. The cast members involved were disappointed but understood the decision." *Undated, but specified as the Monday before Melody Thomas's wedding to Ed Scott. But of course it's possible that the first draft referred to Egypt and was revised after October 7th to mention the cancellation before it went to press. But even making the decision the week of October 7th seems tight to get the Egypt scenes to air on the 17th/18th. I would love to find something from a daily news cycle that would be clearer about the dates.
    • So, Maxim, at this moment in time Evan is under the (mistaken) impression that, for no good reason, Rachel murdered his mother, in cold blood, and his ulterior motive for coming to Bay City is to get vengeance for this wrong that was done to his family & him.  Now, Rachel never murdered anyone. Janice had the knife on her & she pulled the knife on Rachel in the fight they were having. The reason they were fighting was because Janice had been poisoning Mac. So, this sets out the difference between the Frame family version of events & reality as the rest of us know it to be. Also no one in Bay City knows Evan is Janice's son. He goes by Evan Bates, not Frame.
    •      

      Please register in order to view this content

                        Janice Frame is Evan's mother. Janice & Mac were together. Janice was up to no good. Mitch was helping her. She was slowly, little by little, every day, POISONING Mac. She was almost successful. In St. Croix, Rachel & Janice began what was literally a physical fight. They fell into the resort swimming pool, continuing to fight each other. Somehow, I guess Janice had it on her, there was a knife in play but Rachel kept Janice from stabbing her & got it away from her & they continued to struggle until Rachel stabbed Janice, which was a death blow. Mitch did a 180 & helped Rachel get Mac to the hospital. He was so weakened by the poison he could not even stand unassisted. It took both of them together to walk him to the hospital but it did save his life.  The St. Croix remote was SO beautiful, but so dangerous & scary. Also action-packed. Hooray! Maxim's backSo, I just got home & this is what I found waiting for me. I wrote this several hours ago. I guess I neglected to hit send.
    • Thanks @skylark and @DRW50!
    •      Earlier I made a long reply but it doesn't exist. Crap.
    • I do not think I have ever agreed with Vee. Normally I do not read him, Ignore ya know. For some unknown reason I clicked to read. And I agree 1000%. Now, this is so odd that I need to go away for a bit.
    • Justine had a lot of hooey in it, but she was an actual woman, not a guy in drag. She was a doppelganger of Rachel, French, having had a past history with Carl, etc. Two of the more outrageous parts-Justine bricking alive Vicky into a wall & Justine grinding the gears driving a big rig.
    • Hehe, twi/x actually x, formerly Twitter. Typically I find 2 sources for "crazy fan rumors" - the wrong parts of FB and x. Oy.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy