Jump to content

As The World Turns Discussion Thread


edgeofnik

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted (edited)

What survives of Lemay's AW run shows very wealthy characters who have rich inner lives and react in believable ways. 

And in Marland-era ATWT, you had many rich characters who were still grounded and felt real.

The funny part is that the whole idea of soaps being about camp and OTT and glamour became bigger just as the budgets became smaller. Even Y&R and B&B, which were the most "glam" (although outside of some location shoots I always thought B&B looked a bit cheap to be honest), did not survive without huge slashings.

You also have to ask what DOES glamourous mean in 2025? Kim Hughes sitting down in her Patterns chair had glamour...does a never-ending supply of veneers, Botox, Ozempic, and wearing American flag bikinis at Maralago? Does the increasingly desiccated Bravo circuit?

That's why I don't really need whatever turgid idea of camp or money is around in recent years. I'm happy to save that for whatever Jamey Giddens/Ron Carlivati parody project is in the works next.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DRW50

    2970

  • DramatistDreamer

    1958

  • Soapsuds

    1716

  • P.J.

    823

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I agree. It's probably too much to ask for in today's TV landscape. Especially if they want it to survive more than a few years. I couldn't watch that Dynasty reboot but look how long it went on!

I, too, think a good writer could write rich, over the top characters, but still keep them grounded in familiar and relatable emotional conflicts. I'd definitely watch that. As long as they did it in gorgeous clothes with great one liners. (The emotional grounding has to come from the actors as well as the writers. Tamara Tunie is one of those actresses who I feel can make the writing better. Maybe some of the others can as well!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

interesting observation that as budgets decreased, camp and glam increased. and, yes, what does glam even mean these days? 

didn’t watch much of aw’s later years, so i can’t say much there. but as for doug marland’s ‘world turns,’ he inherited both lucinda walsh and james stenbeck, but brought on the snyders (based on his own family). and while no one in oakdale was likely to wind up on food stamps (even when the snyders were in trouble, someone always bailed them out), the hughes and stewarts all worked for a living. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

AW's later years weren't that ritzy. Vicky Hudson may have been the most frugal millionaire ever seen on TV. The Love Mansion was long gone. Victoria Wyndham, meanwhile, complained in one interview about the absurdity of the Corys now answering their own door, and it's true, if you compare the Cory setup in the '70s or even the '80s to what they were by the end.

Marland had a way of presenting struggles but not being down in the dirt. The Snyders always needed money, but Lily had two rich grandfathers to help save the day. And so many of them ended up working for a huge international company. Tom and Margo were middle-class, living on takeouts and working all the time, but they had a beautiful house (I loved their '90s house set). 

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

cannot make this up…

the guests on the first episode of ‘finding your roots’ are lea salonga and amanda seyfried.

not only were both on ‘world turns, but lea was there in 2001 and 2003, amanda 1999-2001. so the two of them may have been n oakdale at the same time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Amanda is only in a handful of episodes around the end of 2000. Peyton List assumed the role in December 2001. She appears just as Carly's leaving Oakdale for France to wind up in the Spa. Her arrival stopped Craig from pressing Carly to accompany her on the trip.

Hunt Block didn't start until mid-2000, ergo Lucy wasn't in town.

Edited by P.J.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

His vision of farm life was a bit outdated and romanticized. I come from a farm family and many of those are not living in modest homes like the Snyders. By the same token, the Snyders are never actually in the fields, talking about crops, worrying about weather, rain, etc. The Snyders were the Spauldings of farm families..what the hell did they actually do/produce?  I remember one scene when a character (a european character obviously a Walsh client, most likely trying to seduce Holden) talking to Emma about all these small little houses with small fields close to each other, and Emma says, "Oh, yes, a lot of our friends had to sell pieces of their land and someone else bought it to start a farm of their own, it happens a lot"  Uh, no it doesnt Emma, corporations were buying farms, (which would have been a good plot...)

i

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

@TheyStartedOnSoaps Great find. A shame it is unlisted. I just loved watching her as Janice. A real shot in the arm for a moribund period.

We'd hear about all the work they did in the fields and once the kids grew up, they're hire hands like Rosanna, but I don't think we ever saw any of the farm on location, aside from some of Holden and Lily walking around outside in 1986.

I can't remember how much Marland said about his childhood - I suppose Emma's farm was what he always wanted his family farm to be.

Much as it was something of a comfort to see the Snyder kitchen up to ATWT's end, I wish they'd stuck to their guns about burning down the farm in 1994. A part of me wonders if they ended up not having the budget and just blamed the soap magazine leak. Given OJ-mania at the time it's not as if millions were poring over SPW or SOD anyway.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

even through the height of oj, there were fans (myself included) who poured over weekly and digest. when i interviewed laurie caso in 1996, he told me that the plan was to bring all of the snyder kids back to the farm.

i’ve talked with him a number of times over the years and always found him to be a straight shooter. were there budget issues? maybe. but according to caso, it was lisa brown who leaked to weekly and the fact that an actor knew about the fire and hit the panic button suggests (at least to me) that the show was serious. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's around when I started reading soap magazines, so I know there was an audience, but it was just hard for me to believe that was enough to kill a huge stunt which would have affected months of storyline. But if he does blame an actor leak, I guess it is true. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would have rather seen Kim and Bob's kitchen (as Gautman seemed to think the show only needed on kitchen set...) the show started at the Hughes and should have ended at the Hughes home.  But yes, they should have burned down that farm, there were always weird logistics going into getting the characters out to "Luther's Corner" where even Lisa would drop by in her fur it was getting nutty. The show actually needed an urban family to offset all the wasps the show centered on...(and believe me, I love that Kim and Nancy cooked in an apron and pearls..)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I wish they'd done more to introduce Jessica's family all at once and on a more regular basis. They would show up here and there, but there was a chance to make them more of a frequent fixture in the early '90s.

I would have chosen the Hughes kitchen over the Snyder farm too, although I never quite had the emotional connection to it that I did to, for some reason, the house Tom and Margo had in the late '80s and a lot of the '90s. I guess because I started ATWT in the late '80s.

I can't remember when that place was redesigned but I missed seeing the old living room. Did we just see a kitchen later on or did they have a living room but just a cheaper version?

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recent Posts

    • Jason, just let me say that it was not my intent to any way impugn any of your data  or research. I'm very sorry if it came out that way. Obviously the person I got these 4 November episodes from has mislabeled files, multiples, which I was certainly unaware of.  When I am editing it is all about what I see & hear. Later, I find time for greater reflection.  Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why.  If you find you are no longer interested in the edit, that is fine. I have no ego in this. I did it only to share it.
    • I feel like Vernon and Anita need to not be hypocrites and try and take the heat off Bill in this case. It's clear that the family used him as a fixer and especially knowing he helped with Martin's situation, they need to either be quiet or support him. BTW...with Vanessa being in the hospital for food poisoning, am I the only one who thought Shanice was gonna say she's pregnant or had an STD? The only reason I say STD is because she hasn't had any memorable sex partners, but I definitely don't believe she just had food poisoning.
    • Yeah, I mean I know that the name still pertains. I just laugh at it not now being called Arizona Dust, but, I admit it simply does not have the same ring to it. Above, that is interesting that Arizona had already come up before the crisis. 
    • Leslie and her family are from Chicago? Anita's background also includes being a former Chi-Town native? Might they connect this and go somewhere with it?
    • Honestly who's to say Leslie even birthed Eva, I mean she's a liar, I wouldn't believe a word she says about Eva being Ted's(or hers)
    •   1. 11/1/83 cast/set list:  

      Please register in order to view this content

          The "11/2/83" video you posted of Ruth Buzzi's scenes includes Roman and Hope in them, meaning the video you posted is actually 11/1/83, since Roman and Hope aren't in 11/2/83.   2. The video you posted of "11/2/83" has scenes with Roman and Hope. As you can see from my cast/set list, Roman and Hope are not in the 11/2/83 episode (see above note):   4573...11/2/83: Cast: Mickey, Julie, Doug, Maggie, Neil, Don, Marie, Alex, Liz, Andre as Tony, Gwen, Chris, Eugene, Sandy, Letitia, Charlene, Mrs. Whiting, Wanda/Guard, Dave, Delia, Saleslady # 1, Saleslady # 2, Figure in Dark, Raven/animal, Cats/animals, Birds/animals.   2.  11/3/83 :My video collection starts with 11/4/83. so I don't have the 11/1/83 or 11/3/83 video, but in addition to the cast/set list for 11/3/83, here is also the parking clearance call sheet for that day, showing Ruth was not only in the cast/set list but did work that day:     They even had hired the animal trainer and all the animals for the day, so It's sort of a certainty that her scenes were not cut that day, or it would have been a big waste of the budget. 3. As for 11/7/83, I just fast-forwarded through that whole episode myself. Letitia is in it from start to finish. It's her big final episode where she is killed. She starts the episode saying "Eugene, are you there?" In the next act, Marlena shows up and meets Letitia's lion. Later in the episode, Letitia is killed by "Eugene" (the Salem Slasher in a Eugene mask).   So, as we can see from your own post, the 11/2/83 date you have listed on that video is incorrect, since Hope and Roman are in that video but not in the 11/2/83 episode.It seems the dates you have on all your early November 1983 episodes are incorrect.   When you post videos and suggest that my data is incorrect, do you not first compare who is in the scenes and see if that matches who is in the episode? You didn't do that with the "11/2/83" episode, which based on Roman and Hope being in it means that is actually 11/1/83. Best to do something like that first before suggesting my data and research is incorrect.
    • Within the Dupree family, I predict Vernon/Anita will be conflicted about what to do about Bill and his role in the whole Ted/Silk Press Sheila situation... especially since Bill knows where the particular bone about Martin is buried. Dani, Chelsea, and Naomi's reactions to what Bill possibly did isn't hard to guess.. but Hayley's reactions will be interesting to hear.  Especially given her recent pregnancy scare.. she might not be so much on Bill's side, or she'll totally surprise us and be totally on Bill's side.   Either way, I think Martin's secret will be the main focus in May sweeps.. with the fall out of the Eva secret playing out in the background... while the Joey/Vanessa/Doug thing continues to boil/develop.
    • Hotel was The Love Boat on land but a little soapier. I will forever maintain that Hotel was a time slot hit. I don't believe that 1983/84 Hotel was a better show than Knots Landing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy