Jump to content

As The World Turns Discussion Thread


edgeofnik

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Yeah, but Dusty had already begun the maturation process even before Marland took over.  Do you remember the scenes in 1983 where Dusty raged and basically destroyed John’s lab? Even by the next year, he had considerably calmed down from that volatile stage and started to mature. 
Lucinda didn’t approve of Dusty and Lily back then primarily because she thought Lily was too young to be so close to a boy she was obviously attracted to and feared for the worst if Lily and Dusty got too close. Once Lily became attracted to Holden, Dusty the minor became the safer alternative in comparison to an adult man in Holden. John Dixon, on the other hand, worried that Lily’s instability would lure Dusty into a sexual situation that they couldn’t easily extricate themselves from. He and Lucinda argued about it. Once Dusty and Lily were living together, Lucinda admitted that she didn’t approve, although she liked Dusty.

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DRW50

    2970

  • DramatistDreamer

    1958

  • Soapsuds

    1716

  • P.J.

    823

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

That's a very good point. You wouldn't get a month-long birthday runup for Heather's Lily. I felt like there was a lot of wheel-spinning as well (I struggle to even remember what voice Lily had by the late '80s - she went back to Dusty, then sort of with Caleb, but sort of not, then got a scar, then was sort of in business, etc.). Using the Derek story to harden Lily (which was dropped early on with Heather - not sure how it would have played out with Martha) was an interesting choice, potentially.

I think the break from Lily was good for Martha for a while, and vice/versa. 

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lily was supposed to be some kind of moral center of the show (or one in training). She was especially Lucinda's judge, which in retrospect is kind of silly. She some how managed to be every man's ideal, so much so it was refreshing when Duke treated her like the brat she was. 

The break from Martha was good for the show, much like the break GL got from Kim Zimmer in the early '90s. Although they tried recreating the Lily/Holden dynamic with both Rosanna/Hutch and Ro/Mike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with you, except for the original recipe part. Lucy Deakins was the first Lily. Martha, originally tried out for the role but lost out to Deakins. When Deakins elected to leave, the show contacted Martha.

It seemed like the sign of the times that these shows wanted at least one character to be the teenage girl who would be the center of attention on the canvas.
I sometimes wonder why they elected to choose Lily and not, say, Frannie Hughes (although I think when Julianne Moore first came on the show, they may have tried to go that route and elected to make the character more ‘Hughesian’ (I.e. earnest). I guess it was somewhat of a trend at the time for these daytime soaps to have their own version of a spoiled rich girl, GL had teenage Mindy Lewis before Lily and Cricket, although to be honest, Mindy seemed more complex as a character than the other two.

With Mindy and Lily, they were heiresses so the entitled behavior made somewhat of sense. I always thought it a bit odd how Cricket just kind of sprung up and out at us. I think she had a cousin or somebody who was a photographer or something and suddenly, she was a spokesmodel for Jabot. Odd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I believe Cricket's cousin's name was Skip, but that's neither here nor there.

Frannie had led the teen set before Lily came to town. I would guess maybe Lily was brought on to give Dusty someone his age to interact with? I'm wracking my brain to try and remember...but other than Paul and Andy, who were younger, what kids were on canvas. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm guessing Marland kind of envisioned Lily/Holden to be a sort of Taming of the Shrew done from 80s teen perspective... spoiled rich girl meeting her match in the stable boy.

Problem was that Lily/Holden were better characters apart then when they were together.  They brought out the worst in one another... Lily being so needy/inspid while Holden being cute but dumb.   Whenever they were apart, Lily got her brains and fight back.. while Holden got his intelligence and drive back.

Lily played Martha was kind of annoying/one note by 1988/9.. that it was nice to have a break for a few years till Martha could grow up and play a more adult Lily.

However, when Holden came back in 1997... Lily regressed as a character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Been revisiting the early 1984 episodes involving the culmination of Steve/Betsy/Craig. The 2 and a half minutes starting at 44:00 in this episode is to this day one of the most emotionally gripping clips I’ve ever watched in daytime soaps. Scott Bryce and Anne Sward were just amazing here…

Please register in order to view this content

 

And also the 3 minutes of this one starting at 21:55… this is what soaps are all about…

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, they were. I know that Anne Sward isn’t some people’s favorite, but when the writing was good, even in some instances when the writing was not so good, she could exude real emotional depth. I also found her believable as Craig and Margo’s (my memories of her mothering Cricket are sparse and faded) mother, despite the obvious real life age discrepancies.

That’s what writers would refer to as the big emotional payoff. Today’s daytime soaps don’t seem to do this anymore. It’s an obvious turning point for Craig (as he has finally realized that he has hit rock bottom) and Lila has to witness the fact that her child has been beaten up (literally) by life, and she cannot do a thing to protect him from himself and his own poor choices, he must turn things around for the better by himself. It took at least a year to get these characters to this point, that’s why those scenes were so gripping.

Today’s soaps usually try to rush the stories to these types of moments, without a proper story setup. As a result, it almost always ends up reading like emotional fodder as Emmy award bait.

Thanks for the reminder @OzFrog for what caused many of us to fall in love with this show in the first place.

On a slightly related note, has anyone ever asked Scott Bryce just how many times Craig went to jail? Didn’t his daddy Bart once land in prison? I had always hoped the show would have Bryant in danger of repeating some of the same mistakes as Craig and having Craig shift to a Lila type character who eventually would have to let Bryant take some hard knocks but unfortunately,  they decided to SORAS Bryant only to destroy him and Craig’s character in the end.

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Heather Rattray did well in the role, but her Lily was very different than that of Martha Byrne. The ultimate problem was she did not share the right chemistry with Jon Hensley's Holden that Byrne did. And Noelle Beck was a horrid Lily, and her casting was insulting. I don't blame her. I blame Chris Goutman. The fact we did a dieting pill storyline involving Byrne and then go and cast Beck, who clearly did not embody that kind of previous storyline, left a major sour taste in my mouth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 member




  • Recent Posts

    • Any fan of RuPaul would dispute calling any of these examples “drag”. A costume?, A disguise?, A lame attempt at humor? -- yes -- Drag? -- nope
    • No asterisk. I meant that the circumstances during the first year were in her favor.
    • Maybe I am misunderstanding you? Are you suggesting that her success at GL should have an asterisk next to it because she was smart enough to exploit a weakness in the marketplace to gain ratings?  Note: Try not to take this personally—I’m not accusing anyone of being consciously misogynistic. I’m simply proposing that the origins of certain ideas about Ms. Phelps—such as claims that she was unprepared or a poor manager of her writing staff—may be rooted in misogyny. Perhaps, with the benefit of hindsight, it's worth reconsidering those opinions. At the very least, imagine being one of the few women in the room while a male network executive tries to decide what women want to watch during the day. That context has certainly led me to reassess many of my own long-held views.
    • Through 78 and 79 under Marland and Pat Falken smith GH was still heavily hospital based with a mix of storylines. The Doctors would have been fine had they followed that template. Once GH went with Ice Princess all bets were off.Who knows how much TD would have copied that direction? And OLTL, DOOL went in that direction quite heavily while other shows dabbled in far out stories. The thing is that TD was well set up for an expansion.
    • Thank you

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Aaron Spelling still had clout with ABC in Fall 1984, as I think they knew he was going to pull out all the stops for Dynasty to get to #1, which he did. That's probably why ABC kept Hotel as Dynasty lead out. Fall 1985 with the sale to Capital Cities and Brandon Stoddard arrival, Aaron Spelling would lose his clout with ABC.
    • Correction, July 1991 to May 1995. JFP got the ratings up during her first year, but it also helped that ABC big three were tanking at various times during that year and Days was in their post-supercouple/pre-Reilly mess era. It will always disappoint me that the ratings during the Calhoun/Long/Curlee era did not reflect the quality of the show.
    • April 2025 Episode Rankings A total of 22 Episodes aired this Month Thanks as always @jcar03!  1.) Jacqueline Maclnnes Wood (Steffy Forrester Finnegan) : 17 2.) Katherine Kelly Lang (Brooke Logan Forrester) : 14 3.) Scott Clifton (Liam Spencer) : 13 *.) Lawrence St. Victor (Carter Walton) : 13 5.) Thorsten Kaye (Ridge Forrester) : 12 *.) Tanner Novlan (Dr. John "Finn" Finnegan) : 12 7.) Murielle Hilaire (Daphne Rose) : 11 8.) Sean Kanan (Deacon Sharpe) : 10 *.) Annika Noelle (Hope Logan) : 10 10.) Kimberlin Brown (Sheila Carter) : 9 *.) Dr. Taylor Hayes (Rebecca Budig) : 9 *.) Laneya Grace (Electra Forrester) : 9 *.) Crew Morrow (Will Spencer) : 9 14.) Heather Tom (Katie Logan) : 8 *.) Lisa Yamada (Luna Nozawa) : 8 16.) Cassandra Creech (Dr. Grace Buckingham) : 7 *.) Sophia Paras (Kelly Spencer) : 7 18.) John McCook (Eric Forrester): 6 *.) Delon de Metz (Zende Forrester Dominguez) : 6 20.) Ashleigh Brewer (Ivy Forrester) : 5 21.) Ashley Jones (Dr. Bridget Forrester) : 4 22.) Don Diamont (Bill Spencer) : 3 *.) Lauralee Bell (Christine Blair) : 3 *.) Jennifer Gareis (Donna Logan Forrester) : 3 *.) Heidi Montag (Herself) : 3 *.) Spencer Pratt (Himself) : 3 *.) Markell Washington (Himself) : 3 28.) Romy Park (Poppy Nozawa) : 2 *.) Dick Christie (Charlie Webber) : 2 *.) Naomi Matsuda (Li Finnegan) : 2 31.) Samantha Cutaran (Nurse R. Rose) : 1 *.) Kitty Davis (911 Operator) : 1 *.) Emily Kasprzyk (Paramedic #2) : 1 *.) Jordan Jamal Mayfield (Paramedic #1) : 1 *.) Jake Osgood (Waiter) : 1  
    • Perhaps. But would anyone have wanted The Doctors to turn into what General Hospital ultimately became?  Dear God in Heaven...
    • Thanks @EricMontreal22 that must be one of the last issues. Probably the best soap magazine.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy