Jump to content

Dallas 2.0: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

So what did we think of tonight's episode? The John Ross and Chistopher partnership/truce seems like something that would come at the end of a reunion movie. Of course it'll be flipped on its ear sooner rather than later. And yet I wonder. It sort of feels like they might unite the Ewings and pit them against "the foreigners" (metaphor from Cidre?).

I'm pretty 100 that was Rebecca's "brother" being rolled up in the tarp, but the way the blood splashed on the twin chimps would have been powerful if she'd lost the babies (as much as I am sick to death of soap opera baby deaths).

J.R., that codger, he seems so frail at times and yet he's often the light of the episode. I thought Sue Ellen slapping him and Christopher going to rush John Ross were both unwarranted.

Who is stepping off the chopper?? Cliff, Carter, Gary, Greg Sumner, Dubya??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I havent seen it yet but dvd it...will see it soon. I heard online from other websites that it was a very good episode. Figures now that most if not all are seeing the Olympics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know, right? Well next Wednesday starting at noon, they are marathoning the entire season leading up to the finale at 9pm. I've missed two or three eps and I'm off on Wednesdays so I look forward to catching up completely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I tried watching the first 4-5 episodes but then I fell asleep. Always happy to hear the intro music though :)

JB doesn't share chemistry with either of her two leading men, I don't believe that the Ewing boys would be interested in her and she is just boring. The casting is all wrong, however I like JH as JR's son who tries to be like his father and ends up being a loser. The dynamics could be very interesting.

JM's Christopher is a disaster. His boring, predictable scenes, his business, the way he acts like a stupid high school girl, everything is wrong. Jesse could play Elena's brother, play with horses shirtless and flirt with Mrs. Ewing and we would all be very happy.

I can't believe that the Tommy actor was not cast as either Christopher or John Ross.

Shouldn't the series have at least one Real Housewives of Dallas type of character? A new Mrs. Ewing, or a friend of the family, a little bit trashy who likes to show off? A sleazy lawyer who is not eighty years old?

Sue Ellen as a Senator is like watching fan fic written by (the always gorgeous) Linda Gray.

John Ross and Christopher cannot carry the show with these two girls. The show could use another Ewing boy (propably Lucas)

I guess Tommy is Ann's son (and not her potential boy toy), the actor is great, Rebecca can be quite interesting (when she is not blackmailed by Baby John Ross in a storyline straight from a kids book), always happy to see Sue Ellen, Larry Hagman could be a caricature, but he is still JR Ewing and if I were a writer I would try to make something interesting out of Bobby's new wife.

So the only thing I can do right now is dream about potential Dynasty 2.0 storylines. I will propably watch the season finale though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I completely agree. He would've brought so much more depth and charisma to Christopher. I'd also love him as a Cliff Barnes type, which could've worked had they kept him and Rebecca related.

The Real Housewives type is Lucy and it saddens me she isn't used more. I don't want her as a lead, but a regular recurring character. The original worked because of that extended supporting cast. The cartel, the DOA, characters like Donna & Dusty before they became regulars. Harv Smithfield. All of those supporting characters in the background help make the show feel real and give it more scope. Who Shot JR only worked because it affected everybody, down to the most minor of characters. Everybody had their chance to shine there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

a) I'm thinking he was definitely in the running and in at least one case lost out to a "name" (pfffft!) like Metcalf and got the "consolation prize" of Tommy (who is of course more interesting than JM's Christopher will ever be). He should not have been killed off. Well, at least that's what it looks like. He would have been a good John Ross too, but I think JH works as a cocky little sh!t.

b ) That's a great idea if they could manage to do it in a not-too-obvious way. That dash of trash and glitz (without going to parody, or even Dynasty proportions) would certainly appeal to some of the audience. Donna Reed thought that Miss Ellie should look more glamorous and "downtown Dallas" (which is how Jill Larson once described Opal's wardrobe). Like Chris said, that could certainly be Lucy. And honestly, oof, this is sacrilege, but that's kind of the only way I could see JVA's Val ever working on this show. Remember alt Val in the Dallas' finale? A well-heeled, well-married (and now, well-preserved) Dallas wife. JVA is very protective of Val but she loves playing tarted up trash.

c) laugh.pnglaugh.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think Steve and Shawn track down Kevin and Jeffrey gives them one dose on the sly in exchange for keeping it quiet. John's organs will go to Bo. We know he's not really coming home. Xander won't make the board meeting so EJ will get the hospital by default. And Kate will tell Xander that Sarah lied to him precisely because she feared he would do something like this to Philip  Those are my Friday predictions! Was a good show. I felt Philip's fear in that last scene.
    • @MaximBoth of Diana Ross's daughter are so talented but also they are a hoot! Check Tracee out here. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DIgzye6xqYQ/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • And now all the episodes are gone. SMH. These jackasses never stop 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Not much happened today. But @brisbydog, all of our wish came true: no Leo this week

      Please register in order to view this content

      I guess Susan was necessary today, but I really wish she’d leave. Marlena putting EJ on blast about Belle was pretty good though, and I hope they continue to use Marlena in their storyline. I’m interested in seeing what happens to EJelle in the aftermath of the John storyline. And I really wish we were seeing Paul and Andrew moving in on John’s location. If they can’t get Christopher Sean on the show, they should at least try to get Colton Little.  I liked how smart Xander was today and that he immediately that Philip stole the drug. He did a pretty good job in his scenes where he confronted Philip as well. I also appreciate the way that Philip’s been written lately; more like a tragic hero than a bratty, goofy clown. Which is all the more reason that I hope the triangle with Stephanie and Alex is revived. But Xander did seem a little overly melodramatic in his last scene though And, I can’t help but think that Dr. Russell being so hesitant about involving the police in the drug theft could be a sign of something. 
    • I haven’t watched since Daisy’s last episode. Part of me feels like its a good place to end it because outside of The Platt’s, Tracy, Todd, and Carla and Swain I haven’t really enjoyed the show. Too many depressing stories and irksome characters, I especially hate what they’re doing to Debbie. I do think its funny they spent all this time investing into that awful new family and apparently they’ve already been canned, feedback must have been horrid.
    • I think the pre-Barnabas episodes are very underrated both for dialogue and character. They're slow but they really create a world and fill out the characters, imbuing them with heavy dimension that ultimately will have to sustain them for years as the show largely stops writing for character after it returns from 1795. What we know about them by then is what they have to power them. (I don't think the show was bad after, I actually love it in '68 and often in times after that, but it was very different.) I think the B&W episodes with Barnabas' early days are especially frightening - they terrified me as a kid - but the color stuff in '67 is also very strong, especially in the stretch where Julia is on the run, Carolyn is under Barnabas' control, and you get the sense that events have gone off the rails for the regular characters and anything goes. As a child viewer seeing it in syndication on the Sci-Fi Channel, who had no idea who lived or who died, it was a lot. Mitch Ryan is especially powerful in the early pre-Barnabas era as the sort of Byronic Burke Devlin character. You knew they had to kill him once Barnabas comes in, despite Ryan's alcohol problem making it impossible to keep him at the show - Burke dominates the first year or so as the fulcrum character, he's incredibly magnetic and charismatic. You couldn't see him becoming a dupe for Barnabas and Julia, as Anthony George's more benign, mild version briefly does before getting unceremoniously killed off. I always found Burke's offscreen plane crash death very eerie and suspicious, and I think the show does toy with the question if Barnabas' powers somehow got him on that plane and if he took it down. I had always wanted Burke to return one day, in any revival project, as a kind of vengeful power broker and puppet master, driven by Vicki's inevitable demise to get revenge on Barnabas and co. I still have Art Wallace's "Shadows on the Wall" DS bible somewhere. IIRC in the earliest versions of the plot Vicki was going to somehow be tied to the butler or his daughter - Betty Hanscomb or something. I don't remember the exact details. I do know there's all sorts of raised and dropped plotlines and characters offscreen in '66, like Ned Calder, the man they clearly intended to pair with Liz and so on. I've always found '66 very rich, but I don't begrudge the show after for it because it's still awfully well-written, specifically the early Barnabas stuff.
    • I totally agree with this, as most of you seem to. Mary Carney was at least competent and reasonably likable; I just feel like she barely had anything of substance to do before she was abruptly given the hook. And I get the backstory of Kathleen Tolan having done a play with Helen Gallagher, but...at any point did they ever actually READ her before they greenlit her? Because...OOF. First time I saw her on SoapNet was right when this GODAWFUL actress named Charity Rahmer played Belle on Days of Our Lives for all of three weeks before she was mercifully recast; her line readings were straight out of a Charlie Brown special. I remember thinking Kathleen Tolan could have played her mother! In the Frank/Jill/Delia triangle, Delia WAS the one who was cheated on, so I got why she was upset and thought it was perfectly valid in theory at least, but of course it was blown up to Wagnerian proportions including falls involving staircases and tricycles. But with Pat/Faith/Delia I had no sympathy for her...especially because it was mainly with Catherine Hicks's Faith and I really liked her.
    • I was going through those episodes from 1984 and early 1985 before they were taken down. Some of the older characters, like Don and even Tom, looked a little out of place, like they were on the wrong show. But the newer characters were fun. It's too bad they lost the character of Melissa. I guess Jennifer took her long-term place on the canvas. 
    • How I will remember him...

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy