Jump to content

Dallas 2.0: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Did he have much to do with the show after say the first season....??? Phillip Capice was the one in charge until he was removed in favor of Leonard Katzman. Now looking back at it I think it was a bad mistake to get rid of Capice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think he had much say after the beginning years or so. He's never really referenced after that.

Whereas, throughout its run, even though he was not actively running the show, he seemed to have had more of role on Knots Landing. Probably because it was the show he always wanted to make and it only got to be on the air due to Dallas being a success.

And say what you want about the last two seasons of Knots or so, but it never went out as bad as Dallas did. It went out with some semblenace of class, dignity, and its identity in tact. Which is more than I can say for the original Dallas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

With a second season of Dallas coming next year...I'd love to see Knots revisited again on TNT. I had a facebook friend from here wanting Dynasty back since Dallas has been revived again...but I dont see that happening without John in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If it turns out the way Dallas has turned out, I'd rather Knots stay in the past.

It's an easier show to adapt for a new generation, but I just don't trust TNT and have never thought highly of their original programming.

I'd love for a Knots Landing reboot to be a success though, if only to see Devious Maids flop on Lifetime so Nicollette Sheridan (who will probably be part of it) can have her last laugh on that hack Marc Cherry...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I do think it can be done without John. If they focus on the younger set. There is alot more of them on Dynasty than Dallas. Hell, the first episode could deal with the reading of Blake's will after his death. But, I do not think it would be on TNT. If these old series get continuations other cable networks will snap them up, which is fine with me. Just as long as they're are NOT on any of the four networks. They would die a very quick death if they were, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Same. Moreover, in retrospect, KNOTS is (for me) the rare example of a show's lesser years -- namely, seasons 13 and 14 -- looking better as time moves forward. I'm not saying those were phenomenal years (season 13 just plain sucks, no matter how you look at it) but I definitely think I might have been more harsh on them than I should have been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Meanwhile, the thought of a KNOTS reboot, as wonderful as it sounds, has me feeling more than a tad skeptical. It has to be done right, with Jacobs (and Michael Filerman) allowed some opportunity for participation in order to help the new series' showrunner(s). But can we trust TNT to do that? Frankly, I'm not sure. (It's just too bad that TBS is probably out of the question.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think I would necessarily say pathetic, but i do agree with your short and sweet point. The show just reached its 5th episode this coming Wed., and I just sit and read the comments about how the show needs to be revamped post haste. I tell you, at my age, there are many who have commented on this new Dallas that never would have watched its original airing like I and millions of others did. 10 episodes is too slow? Try 28-32. Starting in Sept. and ending in May. I can just imagine the comments about this show if that would have happened. I think it would have been cancelled after the pilot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I saw the original from day one and to have the show back is awesome. Does it have some faults/problems? Yes it does just like any show. Even ATWT with Douglas at the helm had some stories I didnt care for...Duncan and his castle for example...but back to Dallas...I am just thrilled TNT decided to revive this show again. Is it the great Dallas of the 80s? No....but it would be hard to recreate a masterpiece of the 80's which was Dallas.

A question...Isnt TNT owned by CBS?? Or so I thought....

And a comment...I noticed this weekend at Target that there was a TNT release...the show were Mark Paul Gosslear appears...dont recall the name since I dont watch but it had a 10 episode release and is now on DVD. I cant wait to see the new Dallas on DVD during Christmastime...lets hope there are some extras.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Jacobs makes basic points about the flaws in the structure. You can't revamp that, but if they had listened to his ideas then maybe characters like John Ross, Christopher, and Ann would not be such failures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think Steve and Shawn track down Kevin and Jeffrey gives them one dose on the sly in exchange for keeping it quiet. John's organs will go to Bo. We know he's not really coming home. Xander won't make the board meeting so EJ will get the hospital by default. And Kate will tell Xander that Sarah lied to him precisely because she feared he would do something like this to Philip  Those are my Friday predictions! Was a good show. I felt Philip's fear in that last scene.
    • @MaximBoth of Diana Ross's daughter are so talented but also they are a hoot! Check Tracee out here. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DIgzye6xqYQ/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • And now all the episodes are gone. SMH. These jackasses never stop 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Not much happened today. But @brisbydog, all of our wish came true: no Leo this week

      Please register in order to view this content

      I guess Susan was necessary today, but I really wish she’d leave. Marlena putting EJ on blast about Belle was pretty good though, and I hope they continue to use Marlena in their storyline. I’m interested in seeing what happens to EJelle in the aftermath of the John storyline. And I really wish we were seeing Paul and Andrew moving in on John’s location. If they can’t get Christopher Sean on the show, they should at least try to get Colton Little.  I liked how smart Xander was today and that he immediately that Philip stole the drug. He did a pretty good job in his scenes where he confronted Philip as well. I also appreciate the way that Philip’s been written lately; more like a tragic hero than a bratty, goofy clown. Which is all the more reason that I hope the triangle with Stephanie and Alex is revived. But Xander did seem a little overly melodramatic in his last scene though And, I can’t help but think that Dr. Russell being so hesitant about involving the police in the drug theft could be a sign of something. 
    • I haven’t watched since Daisy’s last episode. Part of me feels like its a good place to end it because outside of The Platt’s, Tracy, Todd, and Carla and Swain I haven’t really enjoyed the show. Too many depressing stories and irksome characters, I especially hate what they’re doing to Debbie. I do think its funny they spent all this time investing into that awful new family and apparently they’ve already been canned, feedback must have been horrid.
    • I think the pre-Barnabas episodes are very underrated both for dialogue and character. They're slow but they really create a world and fill out the characters, imbuing them with heavy dimension that ultimately will have to sustain them for years as the show largely stops writing for character after it returns from 1795. What we know about them by then is what they have to power them. (I don't think the show was bad after, I actually love it in '68 and often in times after that, but it was very different.) I think the B&W episodes with Barnabas' early days are especially frightening - they terrified me as a kid - but the color stuff in '67 is also very strong, especially in the stretch where Julia is on the run, Carolyn is under Barnabas' control, and you get the sense that events have gone off the rails for the regular characters and anything goes. As a child viewer seeing it in syndication on the Sci-Fi Channel, who had no idea who lived or who died, it was a lot. Mitch Ryan is especially powerful in the early pre-Barnabas era as the sort of Byronic Burke Devlin character. You knew they had to kill him once Barnabas comes in, despite Ryan's alcohol problem making it impossible to keep him at the show - Burke dominates the first year or so as the fulcrum character, he's incredibly magnetic and charismatic. You couldn't see him becoming a dupe for Barnabas and Julia, as Anthony George's more benign, mild version briefly does before getting unceremoniously killed off. I always found Burke's offscreen plane crash death very eerie and suspicious, and I think the show does toy with the question if Barnabas' powers somehow got him on that plane and if he took it down. I had always wanted Burke to return one day, in any revival project, as a kind of vengeful power broker and puppet master, driven by Vicki's inevitable demise to get revenge on Barnabas and co. I still have Art Wallace's "Shadows on the Wall" DS bible somewhere. IIRC in the earliest versions of the plot Vicki was going to somehow be tied to the butler or his daughter - Betty Hanscomb or something. I don't remember the exact details. I do know there's all sorts of raised and dropped plotlines and characters offscreen in '66, like Ned Calder, the man they clearly intended to pair with Liz and so on. I've always found '66 very rich, but I don't begrudge the show after for it because it's still awfully well-written, specifically the early Barnabas stuff.
    • I totally agree with this, as most of you seem to. Mary Carney was at least competent and reasonably likable; I just feel like she barely had anything of substance to do before she was abruptly given the hook. And I get the backstory of Kathleen Tolan having done a play with Helen Gallagher, but...at any point did they ever actually READ her before they greenlit her? Because...OOF. First time I saw her on SoapNet was right when this GODAWFUL actress named Charity Rahmer played Belle on Days of Our Lives for all of three weeks before she was mercifully recast; her line readings were straight out of a Charlie Brown special. I remember thinking Kathleen Tolan could have played her mother! In the Frank/Jill/Delia triangle, Delia WAS the one who was cheated on, so I got why she was upset and thought it was perfectly valid in theory at least, but of course it was blown up to Wagnerian proportions including falls involving staircases and tricycles. But with Pat/Faith/Delia I had no sympathy for her...especially because it was mainly with Catherine Hicks's Faith and I really liked her.
    • I was going through those episodes from 1984 and early 1985 before they were taken down. Some of the older characters, like Don and even Tom, looked a little out of place, like they were on the wrong show. But the newer characters were fun. It's too bad they lost the character of Melissa. I guess Jennifer took her long-term place on the canvas. 
    • How I will remember him...

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy