Jump to content

AMC: Agnes Nixons mistake


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I wasn't all that crazy about the 99-00 stint either. I hated what was done to Janet and to the Dillon family -- even if budget cuts meant they had to leave, I don't believe that you had to end them that way, with a frigging giant candy cane and all that. I hated the story where the Martin men hounded Dixie into a miscarriage. That whole timeline, between this and the story about the evils of Adam, was where the real ruination of Tad as a character began, IMO. Greenlee I never really liked very much because the whole poor little rich girl lashes out stuff is so tired and she was so cold. Scott was boring and wooden. Becca was just impossible to believe. I also thought that Erica's whole "my face, where is my mask!" story was a bit silly, although I understood the point behind that and I did like her with David. I was also disappointed at how little they did with Adrian.

There were some good points (it was nice to see Marian have a storyline, and Vanessa/Palmer were great -- Vanessa was a real force of hate at this time and was fascinating) and I realize that this was a time when the entire ABC lineup was being meddled with and dumbed down, but I can't say I was a big fan of this period.

Is that you Chris Whitesell?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The last thing I wanted to see was someone from WEST VIRGINIA having something to say about someone's sexual orientation. Out of spite, I would've been more than happy to talk about how it's all relative down there. Nevertheless, I'm glad that didn't go any further than, essentially:

Bianca: "Hi, Becca. I'm gay!"

Becca: "Ew!"

...and pretty much Becca was never seen again.

That hair in 3-D would've been tragic!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ah, but in the old days of AMC.. didn't they have characters that represented both sides of an issue? I think they attempted to do that in regards to Bianca's sexual orientation, but didn't put much thought into it. Perhaps, if it were a character that wasn't from West Virginia/southern but someone who had lived in Pine Valley for a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I loved a lot of her return, but you have some valid points. Becca was an attempt to make a new Tara (with Greenlee a new Erica type rival--except as a poor little rich girl)--but the time had really passed for that sort of heroine... (I used to blame the actress but I loved her on Mad Men--of course that was a decade later). I did love the return of Glamorama, Marian and Opal's friendship with Marian trying to get into the Pine Valley society, the return of Edna, etc--those smaller things.

The masked Erica stuff was an example of a not that great Nixon attempt at the gothic (for some reason it reminded me of her Loving story with Dante and him having Curtis in a cage as a his "pet" in tone--dunno why lol)

I know it's unfair to say this, and many will say Agnes shoulda forced it away, btu the whole candy cane/Janet storyline happened as soon as Jean Passanante replaced Elizabeth Page as Agnes' co HW in the credits (actually the show got a lot more outrageous in general when that happened--some would say before it was just kinda sleepy)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

UGH I meant Enid, not Edna. Edna didn't return--I agree that the class stuff--society etc could be, somewhat, reinstated and would add an element to Pine Valley. For much of this decade everyone seemed to be automatically wealthy, and at least finally that's starting to *slowly* change.

It is important, and interesting, to de-mythologize these people like Agnes Nixon I think (I know Y&R fans often talk about bill Bell in the same way, and Lord knows he did some whacked out stories).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, I was half kidding about the whole West Virginia thing. But in all seriousness, I LOVE to debate and I LOVE to write, so I'm totally for having a for and against to any issue and providing conflict to tell drama. However... using Becca to do it? In my opinion, that would've just made the character an even bigger joke than she was already. She would've been a homophobic virgin country bumpkin.

Anyway, I have to say, having seen both the Kevin Sheffield coming out story and the Bianca Montgomery coming out story from beginning to end, Bianca's paled in comparison.

I agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Kevin's was better handled in many ways (I liked even more the post story with his mom trying to get him to see that evil shrink, Opal sorta being for it while trying to support him etc), though Bianca's actual coming out *scenes* with her mom were pretty great. And of course it was a nice (and a first) that they could use a "major character" not some brand new character) to tell the story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That was one of the things that really drew me into AMC in '01-02, the whole contrast between fancy schmancy settings like the Valley Inn, Erica's house, the Chandler mansion, and Wildwind, and little places of "lower" class like the Pine Cone, the clinic, the Pit, etc. The characters sort of reflected that, too. It wasn't as evident as it could have been, but there was a definite line between characters like Erica/Bianca and Simone, newly-returned Kendall, early Mia, Aidan, etc. All of them were pretty much living large and running businesses by the time they were written out.

A HUNDRED TIMES AGREE.

I wish reruns were more accessible so that people could see for themselves and decide for themselves whether or not they liked Agnes's AMC or Bill's Y&R or Marland's ATWT or whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Kevin's coming out story was heads above the Bianca coming out story. You had Opal being supportive but trying to encourage him to seek out Kelsey, you had Kelsey in love with Kevin and he trying to deny he was gay by trying to sleep with her, and you also mixed that in with the teacher Michael coming out of the closet and his job being in jeopardy. Finally, you had Enid back during that time being judgemental and Palmer actually chastising his wife for trying to push Kevin/Kelsey together when he was gay.

I agree that the coming out scenes between Bianca/Erica were wonderful. I still remember one scene where Opal/Vanessa were talking about it and Vanessa was saying that it wasn't a big deal who was gay or not gay. I think Vanessa bought up something about a hollywood actress being gay and Opal gasping at that.. then Vanessa walks away saying something like "I rest my case".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Part of the problem of course is fans are always going on about "the good old days". While I loved most of Broderick's tenure at AMC in the mid 90s, I remember that's when I started posting online, and the majority of the posts I read were almost as negative as any posts I read now, LOL. Of course part of *that* is people online like to complain more than praise, and I stand by thinking that era was better than much since it, and from all I've seen (either "live" or on tapes) most of the time Agnes was most involved in AMC was the best, or what I liked the best. But it's easy to forget how many bum stories there were back then too--by its very nature (having to grind out so many episodes a year) no writer could really manage a flawless run (and even if they were miraculously so talented, so many other factors, like EP, cast, etc play a major part).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I liked that too. Then you had characters like Trey who resented Erica for what she had, because he'd always felt worthless.

Ryan also suited the have not atmosphere much more than the bewildering decision to make him a millionaire (through zero effort of his own) as soon as he returned to PV.

As for Kevin's story compared to Bianca's, the reparative therapy story was just great. Beyond that I think part of it was Kevin was more of a supporting character, with less expectation. Bianca had more airtime and more expectations, yet she spent months doing things like sitting with Gabriel, as viewers tried to figure out whether the show was going to try to turn her straight.

In some ways, the stories at the time, a few of them anyway, offended me so much at that specific time, that the memory has stayed (the same is true for a lot of what was going on at OLTL at that time). If I watch them again I wonder if I might have more of a positive opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There was a journey with Kevin's story that I never sensed with Bianca's. She went on one date with Marcus, got drunk, and then confided in Leo about her experience with Sarah in rehab. The coming out scenes between Bianca and Erica, while somewhat moving (I didn't particularly care for the dialogue or the setup -- sorry), do not a story make as far as I was concerned then and now. The "story" after Bianca initially came out to Leo was all about the build up to How Will Erica React?!? ohmy.gifohmy.gifohmy.gif Everyone else pretty much knew, so there was no real conflict for Bianca to have up until then. Then, from that point on, it was all about Bianca's longing for women that were cockteases. Chaste, lovable, Binks going after Sarah, Laura, Frankie, Maggie... With Erica hating every last young woman that Bianca even looked at. Lather, rinse, repeat from 2000-2003.

I remember Kevin's sense of struggle between coming out and getting his parents and brother's approval, who ultimately rejected him. I remember "Doc Chapman" and the conversion therapy. I remember the mother with hideous hair and clothes loving her son but still being reluctant to accept him back into the family as a homosexual. I remember Kevin and Kelsey and the pressure he felt (and I remember hating Kelsey for that). There were just certain beats that were in the Kevin story that were missed in the Bianca story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I guess RTPP looked worse because it followed Another World, but it's a shame they didn't give it more time especially considering how the shows that were put on following it fared.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Durkin was awful. The writing did her no favors, but she was all wrong for the part, lacking the mix of mystery, steeliness, sorrow and hesitancy that defined Victoria. I still have the awful memory of Adam lugging her around like a rag doll. She looked much more like one of the Blue Whale dancing extras than Victoria. And her voice... Maybe I am too harsh. With that said, Curtis didn't seem as bothered. I see from a fan review mentioning Barnabas & Company that Durkin was asked to return for Victoria's final episodes and declined as she had a Christmas trip to Europe with her husband planned and wasn't interested in just a few appearances.  I refuse to believe Victoria actually died during the Leviathan storyline. If Barnabas and Angelique could come back 8 times, she could come back a few.
    • It's a shame she only appeared in three episodes for the purpose of being written out - I thought she was quite good in the little we saw. I liked her vibe better than Durkin that never seemed to quite capture Victoria as a character.
    • He did a lot of romance novel covers, so that might've just been enough for them to get their panties in a twist.
    • Pre-TGIF, ABC most successful 1980s Friday 8 pm comedy I'd say was Webster. Full House wasn't a hit its first two seasons but it started showing growth in its third season which overlapped with the launch of TGIF. Funny thing is, Full House became a Top 10 show with the 1991/92 move to Tuesday.
    • Oakland Tribune, 14 July 1985   AW is another show with Schenkel at helm By Connie Passalacqua For the most part, dictators of South American banana republics enjoy better reputations than executive producers of daytime soap operas. Total authority is vested in these producers, who can kill off a character (thus firing an actor) with a stroke of a pen, or completely change life in his or her soap opera dominion (both in its fictional locale and backstage at the studio) on any kind of whim.  Most rule despotically, inspiring fear in their actors and writers. Which inevitably surfaces on the screen and subtracts from a show's quality. Then there's Stephen Schenkel who became executive producer of Another World last fall. He's been described by one of his actresses as "a teddy bear." He has noticeably improved the show, mostly because his natural warmth encourages backstage cohesiveness, and he believes in personally nurturing his staff and cast. 'I like to be supportive', he said.' I like to generate a certain amount of enthusiasm. I love actors and writers and technical people. And I like to laugh..  ' Schenkel said that most of the factors that have led to the shows improved ratings existed before he took over. There were well defined characters, outstanding writers and excellent production values, he explains. 'These things were in place but needed to be stimulated. There wasn't a lot of excitement. What really was missing was an adequate story. We added Gillian Spencer as a writer. (she also plays Daisy on All My Children), who's wonderful, and it just coalesced. The writers energy and commitment to the show began to give it an emotional intensity and some real passion within the characters." Schenkel, a former ABC programming executive who helped develop Ryan's Hope, is a strong believer in stressing romantic and comedy elements in soap operas. AW is also one of the only soaps with an established group of comic characters, including Wallingford (Brent Collins) and Lily Mason (Jackee , Harry). Schenkel raves about the talents of all his actors, and even has something good to say about the Brooklyn location of the shows studio, which most of his Manhattan-oriented staff loathe. I like the people here. I like to walk down the street and feel their energies, he said. He also violateda soap opera no-no, ' inviting actors and writers to the same party. "Everyone got to know one another, he said. And I didn't get any complaints about actors ' begging for story lines, he said. 
    • Since it's pride month.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • National City Star-News, 5 May 1977 TV topics by Peter Blazi Lear’s ‘All that Glitters’—doesn’t The best thing that can be said about Norman Lear’s newest soap opera“All That Glitters” is that it comes on so late at night most people will miss it. Role reversal is supposed to be the big draw, with women the breadwinners, mainly executives of a huge conglomerate. The men either fuss with the housework or fidget at the office as secretaries to their bawdy bosses. A female fantasyland? I doubt it. While the role reversal idea has some possibilities, the show pushes too hard for laughs and winds up with raucous females and effete males. A confident, independent woman is indeed a sight to behold and attract, but femininity need not be sacrificed. Unlike Lear’s “Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman,” "Glitters” doesn’t, but you’ve got to give him credit for trying. Today’s experimental comedy is what tomorrow’s hits are made of. Better luck next time, Norman. (“All That Glitters” can be seen weekday evenings at 11 p.m. on Channel 6.) .
    • Actually Kim Zimmer got six weeks off to test the waters for pilot season in L.A. - she said later she went on many auditions and got one offer for a sitcom, but she would one of many in an ensemble. She turned it down, because it wasn't worth leaving Guiding Light for a supporting role on a sitcom. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy