Jump to content

The Soapgeist: July 5, 2010


Recommended Posts

  • Members

We've been counting the cancellations for several years now. 2003 - Port Charles. 2007/8 - Passions. 2009 - Guiding Light. 2010 - As the World Turns. That's four soaps in a matter of seven years. There have been more cancellations-per-year in the past (11 soaps were canceled from 1970-1980), but the simple fact that there have been no new soaps to replace them at all means that the death certificate has been signed, the will has been finalized, the obituary has been written. Daytime soap opera has died at 80-90 years old.

I can't disagree with this enough. I just don't understand this line of thinking. If the show is going to morph into a song-and-dance hour filled with non-daytime stuff and an award here and there, then why do we want it to stay on TV? If it's just going to become something totally different -- something that is barely the Daytime Emmys at all - then why is it important to daytime that it stays on TV? If the plan is to phase out daytime-related content in order to catch "more fish," how is that important to daytime? Why are we still calling it the Daytime Emmy Awards if that's not what "mainstream America" wants to tune in for? Take out the awards, give it a new name, and promote the fact that acts that were "mainstream" over 30 years ago are going to be coming, putting out a watered-down, half-baked performance of one of their hit songs from 1973, and let's see what the f'n ratings would look like then. Remember, the people who tuned in to the AB tribute and gave it high ratings were people tuning into the Daytime Emmys.

Be glad. You only think two minutes were wasted. Try feeling that 20 minutes were wasted.

EXACTLY!!! I don't get it, man, I just don't get it. When I tune into the Daytime Emmys, I expect to see Emmys being handed out to the men and women of daytime television. If the show is 75 minutes of stuff not remotely related to daytime television and 45 minutes of awards, then it is no longer the Daytime Emmys, and I no longer give a damn.

Hey, they gotta "do what they have to do." They have to save the Daytime Emmys by making them everything but. Next year, the Daytime Emmys will be held in the Westboro Baptist Church banquet hall, with hosts Fred and Shirley Phelps who will open with a rousing medley of "God Hates Fags" and "Thank God for IEDs." After a three-hour sermon from Fred on the evils of double coupon days at the Piggly Wiggly, the winner for "Best Drama Series" will be announced via news ticker.

They should have just had all of the people come out, sing a big group performance of "Bandstand Boogie," and let that be the end of it. That's all that was needed. Remember the Sesame Street tribute from a few years ago? They had random daytime stars sing "Sing" with the Muppets after a video package. Perfect. Not too long, not too short.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Isn't Connie Francis the one going on tour with Dionne Warwick? They did the Joy Behar Show a while back.

I think Chubby may be ill. He seemed a little thinner and a bit slowed (yes, I know he's older), and he ended with a tag I've heard all my life growing up in the church, "Pray for me saints", which is code for, "I'm going through something right now."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think another thing that makes the Emmys such a dud these days is that we've for the most part lost our generation of great soap stars. A Daytime Emmy broadcast without Linda Dano, something's missing. Now we have a lot of vapid young stars who love their noms and wins but would rather be starring on the CW. Maybe that's not fair, but even if they love their jobs, they just don't endear me. Many of our older stars can't or won't make the trek, others were on shows that have now been cancelled. Frankly, if I had cable I probably would have been watching the BET awards, none of the noms excited me while many made me scratch my head. They could have always incorporated more soap stars into the musical numbers, but I'm with quartermainefan on this one... spare us. I think the soaps need to dial it back and take the Emmys right on back to daytime. Look, the soap pool is getting smaller and smaller by the quarter, please, let us go to the banana leaved Beverly Hilton or back to the Waldorf Astoria, we don't need a big production. Soap stars cutting up at their tables and mixing it up with muppets and Judge Jeanine Pirro, that's fine by me. Primetime? It's not that deep. The boradcast is for the fans not the industry's ego.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There's a lot of truth to this. Daytime has no real glamour or fun anymore, and that just keeps getting worse and worse because entertainment general doesn't really have glamour now -- look at the common, embarrassing Real Housewives. These are "rich" women who act like bad trash. In daytime itself, your young stars are as vapid as can be. The amount of dead eyes and frozen faces on women in soaps today, especially the younger women, is just awful to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A very special storyline where Maggie Forrester's never seen husband/Eric's never seen brother, John, played by Jon Voight, pickets the funeral of the never seen but beloved Forrester leafblower, Pepe. In flashbacks, we see Pepe, played by Cheech Marin, being treated with great kindness by the Forresters (they gave him an extra turkey leg every other Christmas dinner and sometimes let him have a sick day off without threatening to have him deported). John is outraged over the news that the Forresters are going to pay for Pepe to be cremated (his ashes will be thrown on Brooke), and he leads a hate rally.

They wonder why he has now started hating Latinos as well as gays, and then a traumatized Felicia remembers her 18th birthday party, when she accidentally walked in on Pepe showing John another definition of the term leafblower. Since Felicia cannot actually have a story of her own, Stephanie angrily confronts John, who says he is also going to picket her funeral. Stephanie insists she is not a lesbian, and John bursts out laughing. Stephanie punches him through the wall.

Now that Pepe's secret is out, his younger lover, Ricardo, played by Ralph Macchio, says he will be made homeless now that Pepe is gone. Donna takes kindness on him and tell him that they will pay his rent. He is overcome by her generosity and the beauty and sex appeal that is Donna Logan turns Ricardo straight. They have hot sex. Donna gets pregnant and passes his son off as Eric's new baby boy, named Karate.

Ricardo vanishes, and all is happy for John as he is elected to Congress as a member of the Banana Leaf Party. In his honor, Pam smokes a bunch of banana leaves, gets high, and accidentally runs over Ricardo on his way out of town.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh yeah.... you're talking basic Class and I think that was thrown away when producers realized the legalized voyeurism of Jerry Springer and airing dirty laundry a la Trump vs O'Donnell appealed to people. You can almost draw the generational line between those who want their privacy/practice their art and those who like celebrity/walk through scenes. I know a popular target is writers who don't write brilliantly, but when you have such diversity of acting ability on the same show, it's not the writer's failings. We are not watching Shakespeare daily, arguably - and soaps have always been campy - however in the past actors were able to sell that camp with a higher degree of credibility. I often wonder if this isn't the real reason behind the call for vets to return... it's not that the vets guarantee anything (cough OLTL cough), it's that they worked harder for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I personally could care less about the daytime emmy's they either come on or they don't and it appears that the entertainment industry feels the same way. What people are missing is the fact that if the show did not give Dick Clark his 20 mins of shine nobody would have wanted to air it. No network wants to air the emmy's if soaps is the big draw. To tell the truth the daytime emmy's is probably a big joke no media attention, no more red carpet. no big name recognition. I am not in the industry to I am taking the word of someone who is when they say it is important to keep the show on the air

The people who tuned into the AB tribute and gave it its high rating tuned out right after which is how it became the most watch part of the show. 20 min of a two hour performance isn't taking over the show, daytime was represented in the show Dick Clark was a very impotant part of pop culture I have no problem with entertainers from the past performing in a tribute it happens all the time and believe it or not it doesn't bring down ratings at all. Music is one of those things that is timeless and watching someone perform their original hit from whatever time period is a joy not an insult.

Fans alone aren't going to keep the remaining shows on the air, daytime soaps have to matter to the networks, the industry. If a couple of music acts and a tour of a hotel is needed to finance the emmy's so be it. It brought more eyes to the show and maybe next year a network will want to produce it without all the added fluff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is like saying the fat girl is never going to amount to anything so they never give her the chance.

We don't KNOW that the Daytime Emmys wouldn't be watched otherwise. No one KNOWs that. What we do KNOW is that the networks aren't giving Daytime it's Pride of Place. I'm willing to bet if they did a real show around celebrating daytime - rather than a Vegas show or an Oscar's rip-off, they would see how loyal and interested soap fans truly are. At the end of the day who wins or looses isn't the point - that's conversation for the next morning. What viewers really want to see is their shows honoured and their memories respected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree, but as per usual, instead of focusing 100% on appealing to the loyal following it does have, daytime is more concerned with chasing an audiece it doesn't have and never will have by pimping its splashy awards show in primetime and cramming in a bunch of acts with dubious appeal to non-daytime fans. If I am not a fan of soaps or even talk, why am I watching the Daytime Emmys to begin with? No amount of cajoling is going to make that telecast appointment viewing for me. If I'm a big Tony Orlando fan from way back and I catch wind of the fact that he'll be performing I'll flip back and forth from whatever else I'm watching until I catch him and when it's over, I won't turn back.

That's why I say the Daytime Emmys should go back to daytime and if daytime execs aren't even willing to preempt and hand over two hours for ONE DAY, then I say [!@#$%^&*] the whole thing. You have your built-in audience right there, and they could do all of the cheesy soap star-centric song and dance numbers that they wanted to which might even be more fun and endearing in an intimate daytime "for us, by us" setting. They could beef up the presence of the Drs. Phil and Oz and the slew of TV judges to widen the appeal. Just make better use of daytime's personalities, do some clever, fun pre-taped skits like the TV Land Awards or something. The Golden Globes-style awards shows of the '80s were charming, classy even, but of course Cameron and Sherri weren't our hosts. :rolleyes:

ETA: And on the subject of daytime specials/preempted programming, I think it's a shame that shows with histories like those of GL, ATWT, and even AW, haven't gotten sort of Knots Landing Block Party-type hour specials airing before their finales. They don't even have to preempt another show, they could just air the day before the finale, hell, online even if they're that pressed to rush these shows off the air and not rock the boat. :rolleyes: Just an hour devoted to interviews with the shows' longer running and more popular actors of the past, of course some stuff with newer actors peppered in, but the focus on the rich histories without worrying about trying to appeal to fans of newbie wannabe super couples. But I guess GL got this in the form of its primetime 40th anniversary special and the piece on 60 Minutes. -_-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • BTG: A B&B: B DAYS: B+ GH: A- Y&R: C-
    • I can not see Kat as a police officer and do not want that for her. Thats not her passion nor does she care about that stuff. The stuff with Eva and Leslie is specific to her life and wanting to protect her family. Her "detective" skills have more to do with her business background, which makes her very analytical and pay close attention to details. If this show had a corporation, she'd make a shrewed businesswoman and CEO I definitely dont want to see her sleep with her cousin's husband. That would be too much of a Hayley redux which ironically you dont want with the Sharon/Hayley theory
    • I would make Jan, Ashley's mom, Anita and Vernon's maid. It would lock in to why Leslie would choose to befriend both her and Mona. It also gives Ashley a connection to the Duprees and explains how she befriended Naomi. I would have had Derek start the show as a cop to explain his connection to Jacob. Kat needs to realize that she is MADE to be a detective. Have her go through police training, making the appropriate comments about the uniform along the way. Have her prove she is so much more than a rich princess, even to herself. Then, when Jacob's partner is proven to be dirty, Kat is assigned as Jacob's rookie trainee. At the same time, Naomi does finally get a case she can follow through on. Her client is a person that Jacob arrested. This puts them at odds because Jacob knows this person did it, as does Kat, but Naomi only sees the extenuating circumstances and believes he deserves a lighter sentence and a second chance. THAT is when Jacob will turn to Kat in frustration and she will lose her virginity to him. 
    • This opened my eyes and appeals to my logic. But, don't you also think that the fact that they are so ill-suited means that, by soap-opera-laws, they aren't a long term item?  I like how Belle is written now, so I appreciate the fact that she is in this story.  But, I don't believe anything will become of it, and I think EJ is going to mess it up very soon.  Which explains why I don't get too worked up over it. I'm also suspending my outrage until I see how EJ treats Belle during her mourning.  If he cheats with Cat, then we'll know that he was never meant to be happy.
    • Kristen also raped John post-Paris with a Magic Mirror.  Her pregnancy was "delicate" and they couldn't be intimate.  She had already lost the baby, needed to get pregnant immediately again and set a Stefano tricked out Magic Mirror to hypnotize John and John thought he was  having sex with Marlena.  John woke up the next day and thought it was a dream.
    • The show is only a few months in and still finding it's footing. I'm hoping MVJ has years of story in place for these characters and will pretty much stick to that plan (obviously with tweaking along the way) I do have some issues with the initial structure. Making the Duprees the centerpiece and not having a male with that name. Making Martin Vernon and Anita's would have solved that and made the age of the character more appropriate. I agree about not having a young couple in the beginnings of a romance. And having too many married couples. Jacob and Naomi could be just living together. That makes the possibility of other relationships more viable than within a marriage. Same with Smitty/Martin. Having them married with kids limits the story especially in terms of them as a gay couple.  The white characters existing in another universe is also a problem. That ties in with the workplace/job issues. I don't think they needed the hospital-instead the police station/real estate office or Martin's workplace could have utilized and have Derek/Ashley/Vanessa/Smitty/Shanice etc working and interacting there. ATM too many characters are meeting up in cafes etc-we're not seeing them at work. We needed to see more of how various characters interact eg Jacob/Bill, Ted/Bill. There were a lot of extended family scenes but there should be more one on one to get a sense of character and family dynamics. Leslie is a great character but her bag of tricks is getting over exposed. I would hate that she is kept on and other character's made to look like idiots by accepting her presence. They'll need some good writing and twists to keep her around. We can only hope some of the lesser actors improve as I don't want too many recasts or writeouts. So it's early days and I look forward to seeing the show evolve. And give the Duprees some staff!
    • Thanks. I barely remember any of the backstory there, just his ties to her parents. It was all so convoluted, everything with Tangie.
    • 81 and 82 were rather bad, with the infamous invasion of the Kirkland family. But sometime in late 82 or early 83, Claire Labine was rehired as head-writer and immediately put the focus back on the Ryan's. This time Labine's tenure was short, but she did great work. The entire show was compelling again -- especially the Charlotte Greer storyline (one of the best plots of the entire series).  But Labine was fired, yet again, and Ryan's Bar was bombed, resulting in most of the action being transferred to Greenberg's Deli, and a focus on younger characters with little connection to the Ryan family. So that is what you are probably seeing from 84.   
    • It wasn't that altruistic. He made Tangie a substitute for Blake and was apparently so creepy about it that Tangie spent the years in between getting away from him and running into him in Springfield believing that he had purchased her to be his child bride. It was only when she got to know Blake that she realized that she realized his feelings for her were paternal and suddenly she and Roger became friends.
    • When I watched 1999 Daytime Emmys in real time, I was like "Daytime Emmys will never top this" and that's exactly what happened (at least IMO).
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy