Jump to content

June 7-11, 2010


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I know there's a lot of Jamanda hate but how many times have we seen posts beating the drum of "bring back love in the afternoon"? For all the weaknesses in the story, that's exactly what Jamanda and their wedding was: old-fashioned, schmaltzy, love in the afternoon complete with cute baby, core families, appearances by vets, a beautiful heroine in a gorgeous dress and the entire town celebrating their much exalted romance. For that reason alone, I'm glad AMC held its own.

Maybe ABC has decided to let the soaps fully develop their own identities: AMC=classic, OLTL=comedy/camp, GH=noir

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Re: BlockBuster

Yeah mostly here in Chicago too (they closed three by me over the years)

besides they have been online for years now

competing with Netflix and such.

They use to have locations knee deep a few blocks apart and in nearly every other strip mall

now they are strategically placed

They have this as low as $1.00 red stand alone vending machine for rentals that are placed near (or in) stores / drugstores and

they seem to be doing well.

As for the ratings It will be interesting to see how they will be affected when Nielsen' (finally long overdue) inclusion of Imternet viewership

I'm hoping it helps I criticize ABC because I loathe that network however I still record them to help the ratings because I do like most the actors but I just can't deal with the writing anymore I've had it its too much good stuff out here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree and disagree Monty. Yes we have more channels to watch but, a true fan finds a way to watch. Back when we had good ratings I don't think that we had that many two income family's. I think more people work today and aren't home to watch. I wish that the ratings system can come up with a better way to rate a programs. I agree with Nelson it is the idiot ratings. It is all they have and it sucks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, but they would have brought in more viewers without that horrible music video at the end of Wednesday's episode for an artist no one had heard of. I thought it was funny that Wednesday hit a 2.0 and then the ratings dropped off for the actual wedding. But I am glad to see AMC have a slight rise in total viewers and 18-49 and I agree that it's become a classic soap again. I'm really enjoying it most days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Why does it matter if OLTL lost more than AMC/GH, it still ahead of AMC in the demos.

They are only .1 away from each other in the demos, so it isn't that big of a deal for OLTL, but how many viewers it lost doesn't matter, it's still ahead of AMC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There are just too many options for any genre, may it be daytime or primetime, to get the sort of numbers they garnered in the 1990's: Cable, internet, DVR, movie rental, video games. Primetime has dropped like a rock since the days of Cheers and Cosby so why would daytime ratings be any different? I think TPTB have been trying to hard to reinvent the genre in the hopes of a ratings boost when a return to basics might be a wiser formula. People should remember that NBC is still making money off of Days at a 1.9 and ABC is doing even better with their network owned line up. ATWT and GL were different because PGP wanted out of the genre but SONY can still squueze cash out of Days and Y&R for many years to come. I think soaps will 'bottom out' soon and that most shows are safe. ABC may drop one soap and give something else a try but I don't see any major shifts happening for a while. Once 'green screen' makes it's way to daytime everything will be a lot easier for the genre. Also, look at all the indy online soaps popping up. As things like Google TV fully develop, I see good things coming for 'daytime' which will watchable any time of day. In five years, we may be talking about a whole new crop of shows such as Venice, Republic or the Web to MY TV crossover airing this fall.

As a side note: What is PGP doing with the soaps classics web site? I checked it out and they are posting 'updates' of AW and GL. Does the company honestly think that these shows will one day air again as the web and television merge? I wonder if they plan to eventually sell all rights to a production company. Next fall Hawahi-five 0 will come back and I'm wondering if the same might someday happen for shows like GL. It would be so easy to reuse good scrips and make a lot of oney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That is how I feel too, ATWT/GL were just dead. No way to save them at all, I mean I think ATWT had at least 1 or 2 years left in them, but it had to happen eventually.

Aside from ABC dropping a soap, I don't think there will be another soap cancellation for a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But what's a true fan? The ages of soap watchers are older - that's been pretty widely acknowledged, but they are also dying themselves. 20 years ago we had an entire generation that was raised on their 'stories' so they raised us - their grandchildren - that way, but they are now gone. Loyalty like the pre-war generation had is now a thing of the past and I think TPTB know that. We can talk 'till the cows come home about attracting former viewers back, but that's not a growth area and never will be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think loyalty is bred in a viewer. When it comes to stuff like Twilight, some young people are as obsessed as they once might have been about soaps. Even a lot of the older viewers gave up on soaps because soaps did not want them anymore.

The soaps stopped giving people a reason to care. They were so desperate to get viewers who don't watch soaps that they ran off those who actually enjoyed or could potentially enjoy soaps. Stories are made up as they go along, characters are trashed, the shows are often depressing and reward the worst of humanity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's not the same though - and Twilight is a perfect example (my 12 year old is part of that crew). Fans loyalty builds with the next book or movie is about to come out, then they back dodwn and look for something else to distract them. People like the quick-and-dirty and the "NOW", but being a soap fan takes a hardier soul. I can remember my grandmother stomping her foot at the TV and yelling at various characters (you have to appreciate, from my Scotch Presbyterian grandmother that was completely OOC behaviour) but the suggestion that she stop watching if she didn't like it was tantamount to suggesting strip-poker in Sunday service would be a good thing. She was aghast at the notion. That's the generation I'm talking about - they hung in there for the long haul through a lot of history. The instant gratification of today would appal them.

I don't think it's as simple as "build it they will come". Perhaps that worked once but the attitudes in society have changed greatly. Now it's a matter of "what's in it for me" - so if they cant feel the investment for their viewing within a day or two, they move on. Soaps are not a "day or two" proposition by definition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

i actually don't consider GL or ATWT to be 'dead shows'; a new team could have easily gotten them back on track if PGP had had the will and desire. I would almost dare to say ATWT is doing well for a show with no promo, no mag cover stories, bad writing and an expirtation. Yes, they could be getting more of a Bell boost but ATWT is a very different sort of show. I am curious to see what NBC does with Days but could see NBCU moving it to a cable station or Sony trying to farm it out.

As someone said earlier, soap fans are a different breed--most viewers can noot stand to invest five hours per week to any given program; however, there will always be a goodly market for well done sudsers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I definitely think FV wanted to pair Kristina and Lucky.  Why else would Lucky decide to become a bartender at her stupid bar?  Lucky was a cop, a crusader?-whatever he was doing in Africa and all these years away.   It makes zero sense for him to just be content tending bar for some flakey girl he knew since she was born.  Have him work with Spinelli at PI firm or something.  There were also some scenes with Kristina and Lucky that seemed like the show was leaning in that direction.  I also suspect JJ was extremely unhappy with that idea lol. As far as Lulu, I certainly don't miss the JMB smug era.  I hate that BLQ looks like a poor, innocent victim being tortured by Lulu at every turn though.  
    • I do think she's been pretty wrecked, having tried to kill someone in cold blood, letting her whole family (including the woman pregnant with her great-grandchild) get charged or questioned, and having no remorse, but it doesn't matter as much because Kathy has not existed as a character since Gillian's return anyway.  There are reasons to bring Max back, like Lauren and his not knowing he had a child with Linda, but he is exhausted, with Jake Wood phoning it in years before he left.  I am a little surprised about Zoe because Michelle Ryan said for years she didn't want to return, to the point of even asking the show to recast the role, but I guess this may only be a short stint. I wouldn't be shocked if they kill Zoe off.
    • HAHAHA. Yeah, that's my bad. I misread that line. Sorry about going into "Unnecessary" detail about my username. Anyway, I love the story behind your Username.    reading on my phone...

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Completely agree with you. I think Bonita Brisker has been really good as Sharon. What Anita did was obviously awful, so she doesn't need to reign anything in. We're getting a good look at someone who's struggled in life compared to Anita "We're the Duprees!" Williams.   -- Anita is starting to look foolish for dredging all this up just so she  can get her ass back on stage. Is she so delusional she doesn't realize how she hurt Sharon and Tracy? -- Anita's line to Vernon "How can I expect Sharon to forgive me when I haven't forgiven myself" struck me as really selfish. After all that with Sharon, Anita again made it all about herself. -- Does anyone really believe Anita wants equal billing if the Articulettes reunite?  -- Colby Muhammad continues to be a standout. Her Kat more than holds her own with Leslie. -- The writing was very good for the father/daughter scene between Ted and Eva. It wasn't so good between Ted and Martin in their father/son scene. It didn't play like family to me, especially when Ted referred to "my wife" when talking about Nicole to Martin. -- Overall, a very solid show today.    
    • I honestly do not see the point of Max coming back again. Zoe does not surprise me. I've been waiting for that since Bionic Woman flopped in the US, frankly. I'm not against it vs. some other pointless returns. Some returns work and some don't, some are just there. Like, am I grateful that Kathy is alive? Yes, absolutely. Do I love any of her stories? No. But she's not utterly destroyed, she's just there.
    • I think Frank probably wanted to try for Jonathan with Kate Mansi. I actually can't knock the idea of a Lucky/Kristina affair or flirtation on paper, as a romantic obstacle to LNL2, but not with the characters in the places they are at present or have been over the last few years. It would be a mistake to do right now and would poison the well. I think Jonathan probably made it clear when he came back that he wanted what had been promised to him years ago with Elizabeth, and between his not being one of FV's preferred focal leads and Liz being a grudging afterthought if she's not with one of his OLTL stars, I suspect FV was content to leave them where they are vs. where they should be, which is central on the show. It's like I said a few days ago: A lot of this is how Lulu has always been. But back in the day the issue was that Lulu (and Carly) were deified for it, whereas now it's that Lulu is just used as the heavy because FV has a preexisting favoritism for Setton/BLQ. And that's a waste of a key character and talent, namely Alexa Havins.
    • Melanie Smith was very difficult to replace, but as KMH did last for a long time, she clearly managed to do so. I preferred Melanie, but the main issue with Kelley is I just think she was horribly written for most of the time. Initially the writing wasn't horrible, it's more she was not the right choice, but over time the writing genuinely became awful, and unplayable, with a few exceptions (I think her pairings with Chris and Hal worked and got to take her in some new directions).
    • Coming into June and...   TRASH. Or as I like to say for moments like this...HUNNI, WHAT IS THIS?   Outside of seeing Traci come home...and then...Ashley...not a darn thing is going on. So they are clearing stalling now, aren't they? It really hit me during the Phyllis/Daniel scenes. It was feeling like a B&B scene where two characters have the same repetitive conversation. And I have not seen Phyllis/Daniel scenes in that light lately so yeeeeah NOPE.   I did like the touch of Traci arrived outside of the Abbott mansion door and taking a breath and looking around. Very aftereffects of Martin. And I liked her and Diane having their conversation about Martin. I wished JG had allowed Traci to stay in town to deal with her feelings about Martin so at least we are getting some follow-up on that.    And same with Ashley and her talk with Jack. I will take Eileen Davidson anyway I can get her. Dare I say...will she be around for the Dumas reveal?   Outside of...   Kyle, Claire, and Harrison in a park IS NOT a storyline.   Sharon having to use the phrases (and in text) with Nick dinner as friends IS NOT a storyline.   Giggly Heffa giggly-heffa-ing around town IS NOT a storyline.    With Damian MIA and my love of Eileen Davidson...I might just go on break until the Dumas reveal if this is how we are starting June. 
    • Dragging this quote over from the Texas thread just because it shows a reference to Bay City as a fictional location at least as early as 1981. It doesn't quote Gail Kobe as saying it directly but the point she is making about the Houston setting of Texas does seem to take it for granted that Bay City is not real.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy