I'm not assuming an agenda, but it's obvious you hate Kriezman and keep writing these ludicrous rants about what's going to happen. You don't know anything more than I do about story projections.

You're right; I don't. (Neither do Dave and Donna, for that matter, and it's their projections, lol.) Nor have I pretended to know.

I will say, however, I've watched enough of Dave's work on ATWT and GUIDING LIGHT to know a "repeat offender" when I see one. (And I'll leave it at that. Seriously. No more "rants" from me on this particular subject.)

I'm sorry if you're offended, but it's ridiculous to call Jake/Amanda the "signature" couple when they're not going to be featured every day like Gus & Harley were on GL.

Famous last words.

So...what were we fighting about again? ACK! This whole cynicism-mistaken-for-ranting business has me all confuzzled!

We are not fighting. I'm just making it clear for anyone else who thinks that my disliking what the others are doing to David is the same as defending or making excuses for David. Also, possibly articulating it for others who might feel the same way. You know how I feel about ambiguity when it comes to my posts. I try my best not to leave room for someone to say "Well, ya know... R. Sinclair said yadda yadda yee..." when I didn't/don't feel that way at all.

You know I you.

You know I you.

I'm glad someone does. All of a sudden, I feel like ... well ... like David Hayward.

I'm glad someone does. All of a sudden, I feel like ... well ... like David Hayward.

And like David you have plenty of fans.

I'm glad someone does. All of a sudden, I feel like ... well ... like David Hayward.

No kidding. I think I'll start running to the board administrators every time you disagree with me.

I think I'll start running to the board administrators every time you disagree with me.

You wouldn't be the first. As a matter of fact, I'm convinced SON has set up a separate department just for post-ers with complaints against me.

I could care less about who's in the opening, who's not in the opening, blase blah, but I do not like the stylistic choice ( ) of how the opening just abruptly *happens* these days. They should really bring back the vamp. Such a simple and effective way to draw in the audience, it was a non-verbal, "Uh-oh, here we go y'all" that even made not-so-interesting stories seem a little more exciting.

Concur! Bring it back!

I really like Jamie Lunar and MEK.

Are there really bail hearings at night?

Well, that music video was um, interesting. Who's making these production choices? We would have never seen anything like that under FMB or Wendy Riche.

Edited June 13, 201015 yr by Jonathan

You wouldn't be the first. As a matter of fact, I'm convinced SON has set up a separate department just for post-ers with complaints against me.

Don't know about that, but I know I was issued a "friendly" and belittling warning from Errol, because I made a snide remark about a poster even though I didn't mention their name in the post that I, apparently, made the snide remark about. I'm like, "how does that even work?"

The response I got? "Oh, you know exactly what I'm talking about."

How can I possibly, when I'm accused of making posts about a mystery person whose name I never mentioned. If I never mentioned their name, who's to say I was talking about them? THEM? "They" could be anybody.

It's like, really. Do you wanna waste your time policing posts because someone's ego is so big they think anything I post might be about them?

I never ran to a board monitor because I thought someone might have made a snide remark about me without mentioning my name. But, then again, I'm old enough to articulately fight my own battles and address a person directly... which I would totally do... if this mystery person showed themselves.

I'm still at 20% warn status for something I said several years ago and I was never told exactly WHAT it was...

That's because I whined to the administrators about that damn book of yours. Apparently, that's all that needs to be done to be "warned" or "banned."

Are there really bail hearings at night?

How could I forget?

So desperate.

So desperate.

Case in point.

That was "direct"?