Jump to content

AMC: Agnes Nixon Interview with EW.com


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Finally a decent soap related piece from Ent Weekly, even it is online only. I wish it would have been a bit more candid, but really that's much more candid than one usually gets from Agnes, so I guess it'll have to do. Some great bits though as usual it's not always easy to read between the lines (does her One Life comment mean she endorses what RC and FV are doing there? was that a warning to Kreizman or her old best friend EW?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

<_< Some people wouldn't be happy even if Agnes came out of retirement to write full time for One Life and sacrificed AMC for its survival ;) What about us Loving fans (though actually she did stay more in touch with Loving creatively than One Life--One Life she basically left all together after 5 years whereas she was back at forth at Loving, even writing its penultimate year--but then again ABC never wanted to buy Loving so her production company owned it the entire time--City too, another reason they canceled it so early for PC)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Right, but ABC wanted a soap and Agnes was happy to give them one since they had been so good to her up till then. Even the network admitted they fucked up though--the original intention was to sandwich it between AMC and OLTL (both which were doing really well)--then they put it as their first soap, before even Ryan's Hope (of course a few years in, they switched it with Ryan's Hope which did slightly improve the ratings, and pretty much meant Ryan's Hope had little hope). If it was on CBS I dunno if it would have been treated any better--remember their own Capitol was quite highly rated when they decided to sacrifice it for B&B.

NBC probably could have had more of a hit with it, but then again NBC have always fucked up their soap schedule, so...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ha....she is also delusional if she thinks soaps are going to be around and that GL/ATWT cancellation are not going to affect the other soaps staying on the air. She is wearing blinders.laugh.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Haha I did laugh at that too. On one hand it's probably quite exciting for One Life (BTW has their stuff at the new studio started airing?) By all accounts their old place was TINY and also didn't have proper dressing roomes (!). But then to constantly hear about the awesome move out west of AMC, bla bla bla must make any excitement they have feel kinda... Well bringing back the ugly stepchild analogy, it's like your older brother giving you his great old room--because he's moving into the new massive suite your parents built above the garage :D

That's silly ol' Aggie for you--always so blind to how the industry works and what's going on around her. Gotta love that dementia riddled nutjob! :D

Do you want her to tell EW--well I've heard on the internet that this move means nothing except that our show will die even sooner--so within a year I expect my soaps to be gone and within 3 all soaps to be gone--thanks for the interview!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The storyline April and Draper are involved in during the summer/autumn of 1979 seems fairly "benign" but soon turns very serious.  April has a VERY intrusive, wealthy mother (Margo Huntington Dorn).  Margo knows that April and Draper (who've recently had a miscarriage and are theoretically never going to be able to conceive another baby) want to buy a house.  Margo hoodwinks them into buying a house they can't afford.  The house is listed at $100,000 (about $400,000 in today's dollars).  Margo pays the first $35,000 and leads Draper to believe the asking price of the house is $65,000 instead of $100,000.  If Draper finds out his meddling mother-in-law paid 1/3 of the cost of the home and tricked him, he'll be mad as hell.   Meanwhile, Draper has received a job offer from a prestigious New York law firm.  Margo pulls some strings and has the senior partner in the firm rescind the offer, to keep April in Monticello.  If Draper finds out about THAT, he'll be even angrier with Margo than he will be about the house trickery.  All of that is "bubbling under the surface" in the fall of 1979 but will be the next major story, as everything begins to spiral out of control.  
    • It felt weird and out of place.  I get. While I agree with those on here that he's gotten better, it's still really bad. I'm not seeing the "good" acting some see...but I'll give him a B for being better than when he first started. There's potential. I'll leave it at that. 
    • It's like watching paint dry at a slow-ass pace. It's bad acting. Entirely. Excellent? With Claybon? Never. Ever. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Ah! Good to hear. Isn't it especially odd to think that house fictionally exists not far from the Karrs?  Or, that it was designed non-fictionally by the same person who designed April's place?
    • Good to know I'm not the only one who noticed that. Strange and awkward, and I don't know what they're doing with those fades.   -- Finally, had to laugh at how many Emmys this board passed out today.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Not unless they live in an apartment complex. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That was bad. Product placement is fine, but not here, not now. Besides, no one carries their damn detergent to the living room.   Completely and utterly disagree. I thought Brandon Claybon was excellent today -- maybe his best performance since the show started. No recast needed.   Not unpopular with me. That didn't work. The montage was good, but 5 minutes of Amazing Grace? With all those verses? No. What kind of family breaks into a loud version of Amazing Grace after what just happened??? None. Anita's lecture to Leslie was great. Ending the show -- a really good episode with crackling dialogue -- like that was a mistake.  
    • Today, was a fantastic episode. I loved everything about, including Ainta singing, Amazing Grace. I love the family dynamic of the Dupree's so much. They remind me of my own family at times. Martin & Smitty have come leaps and bounds from where they  started. I genuinely felt a connection between them I can't wait to watch it deepen. Dana/Leslie/Sherry/Ana is a piece of work. Her speech at the Dupree's about her "concern" for Eva and then locking her out of their apartment??? She is pure evil, but I love it. I can't wait to see where the Eva/Kat story goes. There's so much potential there. As for Ted, I need to see Keith Robinson in the role before giving my true critique of Maurice Johnson.
    • I don't recall that we ever saw the exterior of the Madison house.  BUT the interior is definitely Mission Revival.  It has a wrought-iron staircase, and all the doorways & corridors have archways.  I watched a few old episodes over the weekend from that period and really noticed for the first time how uniquely Mission Revival the set is.  
    • I know Daphnee's back hurts, because she was carrying Maurice through those scenes! Still not loving the idea of replacing the actor, but he was giving very little.  Brandon's scenes with Leslie did not hit the way they were supposed to because I was busting out laughing.  One thing I enjoy about this soap is how it plays with the nuance of good and evil. Kat vs Eva and Anita vs Leslie. There are some things that Kat and Anita said that makes it hard to root for them and how the Duprees can be family over everything to a fault. It almost makes them come across as entitled and unlikely at times. And while what Lesile and Eva have done is wrong in different ways, you can see that hurt and sympathize.  Now, what I don't get is what Lesile thought she was doing expecting the Duprees to accept Eva with open arms. Honey, Eva is a Richardson not a Dupree. In the Dupree world, she's Ted's problem unless they choose otherwise, because there ain't a drop of Dupree blood coursing throught her veins (unless we learn otherwise in some twist). Ted is lucky if they don't disown his ass.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy